Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Building Blocks of Religious Systems: Approaching Religion as a Complex Adaptive System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolution, Development and Complexity

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

Religions consist of cognitive, neurological, affective, behavioral, and developmental traits that form a complex adaptive system. The underlying adaptive goal of religious systems is to foster cooperation and social coordination within communities. The workings of religious systems are intricate, and even convoluted, but at their core, they maintain eight primary interdependent building blocks: authority, meaning, moral obligation, myth, ritual, sacred, supernatural agents, and taboo. These features exhibit independent phylogenetic histories, but at some point in human history, they began to regularly coalesce across human populations. Religious systems, which require energy like all systems, are fueled by ritual behaviors. Ritual’s interconnections with the other core building blocks produce individual-level effects, including physiological and affective responses, which in turn yield group-level effects such as shared cognitive schema, ethos, symbolic meaning, and identity. These group-level effects result in a sense of communal order and produce social norms, most importantly, norms that encourage cooperative and coordinated behaviors among community members. Further investments in ritual, which sustain the religious system, depend upon the success of these collective behaviors. Specifically, religious systems maintain positive and negative feedback loops that inform individuals about the system’s success, or lack thereof, in terms of collective outputs, mating opportunities, reproduction, and health outcomes. When cooperation fails, or mating, reproduction, or health suffer, the religious system will generally adapt to its current environmental conditions accordingly, sometimes subtly without notice among adherents and sometimes through significant revivals that reinvigorate ritual participation. Religious systems that are unable to adapt cease to function as living social institutions that bring order to individual lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcorta, C.S. and Sosis, R. 2005. Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols: The evolution of religion as an adaptive complex. Human Nature 16:323–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcorta, C.S. and Sosis, R. 2006. Why Ritual Works: A Rejection of the By-Product Hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:613–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. 1993. A History of God. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. 2000. The Battle for God. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Q.D., & Whitehouse, H. 2011. The cultural morphospace of ritual form: Examining modes of religiosity cross-culturally. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32:50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J.L. and Lawson, E.T. 2001. Ritual intuitions: Cognitive contributions to judgments of ritual efficacy. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. 1967. The Sacred Canopy. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E. 2000. Sect, Subsidy and Sacrifice: An Economist’s View of Ultra-Orthodox Jews. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115:905–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E. 2009. Radical, Religious and Violent. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, A. 1999. Mighty like a river: The Black church and social reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. 1974. Symbols, song, dance and features of articulation: Is religion an extreme form of traditional authority? European Journal of Sociology, 15, 54–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, J. 2009. Charismatic signalling. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature, Culture, 3(4), 518–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, J. 2012. Spreading order: religion, cooperative niche construction, and risky coordination problems. Biology and Philosophy, 27(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, J. and R. Sosis 2011. Signaling theory and the evolution of religions. Religion 413:363–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. 2001. Constantine’s Sword. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, F., & Squier, R.K. 2008. “He Blinded Me with Science”: Science Chauvinism in the Study of Religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 76(2):420–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, F., & Squier, R.K. 2013. Religion as a complex and dynamic system. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 81:357–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corning, P. 2002. The re-emergence of “emergence”: a venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity 7(6):18–30.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. 1994. Evolutionary Theories of Morality and the Manipulative Use of Signals. Zygon 29:81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czachesz, I. 2014. The Evolutionary Dynamics of Religious Systems Laying the Foundations of a Network Model. Origin of Religion, Cognition and Culture, edited by A. Geertz and J. Sinding Jensen, pp. 98–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, W.V., J.D. Davidson, D.R. Hoge, and M.L. Gautier 2007. American Catholics Today: New Realities of their Faith and their Church. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aquili, E.G., Laughlin, C.D. and McManus, J. 1979. The spectrum of ritual. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. 2010. Incomplete Nature. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1912/1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, N.J. 2003. Real Jews: Secular vs. Ultra-Orthodox and the Struggle for Jewish Identity in Israel. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, E. 1965. Theories of primitive religion. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, D., P. Swartwout, and R. Sosis. 2010. The Socio-Religious Brain: A Developmental Model. Eds. R. Dunbar, C. Gamble, J. Gowlett. Proceedings of the British Academy 158: 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1967/1973. Religion as a cultural system. In The Interpretation of Cultures, pp. 87–125. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D., and Shikaki, D. 2007. Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7357–7360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadaway, C.K. and P.L. Marler 2005. How Many Americans Attend Worship Each Week? An Alternative Approach to Measurement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 44:307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimola, M. 2012. Religious Rituals and Norms in the Making of Adaptive Systems. Doctoral thesis, University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. 2009. The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 244–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., and Hurtado, A.M. 1996. Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogbin, I. 1970. The island of menstruating men: Religion in Wogeo, New Guinea. London: Chandler Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H. 1992. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H. 1995. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H. 1998. Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H. 2012. Signals and boundaries: Building blocks for complex adaptive systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone, L.R. 1994. Why strict churches are strong. American Journal of Sociology 99:1180–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. 2001. Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In R. Nesse (ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment, pp. 292–309. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.D.P. 2016. God is Watching You: How the Fear of God Makes Us Human. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. 1995. At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, E. 2010. Shall the religious inherit the earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiper, J. and Sosis, R. 2014. Moral intuitions and the religious system: an adaptationist account. Philosophy, Theology, and Science 1:172–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiper, J. and Sosis, R. 2016. The Roots of Intergroup Conflict and the Co-option of the Religious System: An Evolutionary Perspective on Religious Terrorism. In Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Religion, eds. J. Liddle and T. Shackelford. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, M. 1995. Ordered Universes: Approaches to the Anthropology of Religion. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H., King, D., and Carson, V.B. 2012. Handbook of religion and health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugel, J. 2017. The Great Shift. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, J.S. 2003. Complex adaptive systems. Annual review of anthropology, 32(1), 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazerwitz, B. and M. Harrison 1979. American Jewish Denominations: a social and religious profile. American Sociological Review 44:656–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, A. 1978. The Pawnee ghost dance hand game: ghost dance revival and ethnic identity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S.W. 2003. Mystics, mavericks, and merrymakers: An intimate journey among Hasidic girls. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1964/1994. The raw and the cooked: Introduction to a science of mythology. New York: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienard, P. and Boyer, P. 2006. Whence collective rituals? A cultural selection model of ritualized behavior. American Anthropologist, 108(4), 814–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhrmann, T.M. 2012. When God talks back: Understanding the American evangelical relationship with God. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, R.N. and Lawson, E.T. 2002. Bringing ritual to mind: Psychological foundations of cultural forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mecklenburger, R. 2012. Our Religious Brains. Woodstock, VT: Jewish Lights Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.H. and Page, S.E. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. 2009. Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, J. 1965. The ghost-dance religion and the Sioux outbreak of 1890. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerhoff, B.G. 1974. Peyote hunt: The sacred journey of the Huichol Indians. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, E.A. 2017. Discerning devotion: Testing the signaling theory of religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38:82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B.G., Finkel, D.N., Shaver, J., Wales, N., Cohen, A.B., & Sosis, R. 2012. What does God know? Supernatural agents’ access to socially strategic and non-strategic information. Cognitive Science, 36:846–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B.G., Haque, O., and Sosis, R. 2014. Extending Evolutionary Accounts of Religion beyond the Mind: Religions as Adaptive Systems. In Evolution, religion, and cognitive science: Critical and constructive essays, eds. F. Watts and L. Turner, pp. 74–91. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B.G. and Sosis, R. 2009. The Religious System as Adaptive: Cognitive Flexibility, Public Displays, and Acceptance, in E. Voland and W. Schiefenhövel (eds), The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior, pp. 243–56. New York: Springer Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B.G. and Sosis, R. 2010. Religious Concepts as Necessary Components of the Adaptive Religious System, in U. Frey (ed), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Philosophy: Evolution and Religion, pp. 37–59. Marburg, German: Tectum Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B.G. and Sosis, R. 2011. Our Gods: Variation in Supernatural Minds, in Essential Building Blocks of Human Nature, ed. Ulrich Frey, C. Stormer, K.P. Willfuhr, pp. 77–93, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B.G. and Sosis, R. 2013. The extended religious phenotype and the adaptive coupling of ritual and belief. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 59(2): 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B.G. and Willard, A. 2016. MCI Theory: A Critical Discussion. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(3): 207–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. and Campbell, D.E. 2010. American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, P. 1956/1972. The trickster: a study in American Indian mythology. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R.A. 1979. The obvious aspects of ritual. In Ecology, Meaning, and Religion, pp. 173–221. Richmond, CA: North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R.A. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. London: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, M. 2004. Fundamentalism: The Search for Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schloss, J.P. and Murray, M.J. 2011. Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: A critical review. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1):46–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, D. 2010. One people, one blood: Ethiopian-Israelis and the return to Judaism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A.B. and Weller, R.P. 2012. Rethinking pluralism: Ritual, experience, and ambiguity. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. 2015. The evolution of stratification in Fijian ritual participation. Religion, Brain & Behavior 5(2):101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. 2017. Why and how do religious individuals, and some religious groups, achieve higher relative fertility? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 324–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J., Divietro, S., Lang, M., and Sosis, R. 2018. Costs do not explain trust among secular groups. Journal of Cognition and Culture 18: 180–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J., B. Purzycki, and R. Sosis 2016. Evolutionary theory and the study of religion. In The Oxford Handbook of the Study of Religion, eds. M. Stausberg and S. Engler, pp. 124–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W.C. 1998. Believing: An historical perspective. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W.J. 1979. Ritual and the Ethology of Communicating. The Spectrum of Ritual, New York: Columbia University Press, pp., 51–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. 2003. Why aren’t we all Hutterites? Costly signaling theory and religion. Human Nature 14:91–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. 2005. Ifaluk Atoll: An Ethnographic Account, in eHRAF World Cultures, ed. Carol Ember. New Haven, CT: HRAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. 2007. Psalms for safety: Magico-religious responses to threats of terror. Current Anthropology, 48, 903–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. 2009. The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture. 9:315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. 2016. Religions as complex adaptive systems. In Mental Religion: The Brain, Cognition, and Culture, ed. N. Clements, pp. 219–236. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., and Alcorta, C.S. 2003. Signaling, solidarity and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology 12:264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. and Alcorta, C.S. 2004. Is Religion Adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:749–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. and Bressler, E. 2003. Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research 37:211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. and Handwerker, P. 2011. Psalms and coping with uncertainty: Israeli women’s responses to the 2006 Lebanon War. American Anthropologist, 113, 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. and Kiper, J. 2014a. Religion is more than belief: What evolutionary theories of religion tell us about religious commitment. Challenges to religion and morality: Disagreements and evolution, eds., M. Bergman & P. Kain, pp. 256–276. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. and Kiper, J. 2014b. Why religion is better conceived as a complex system than a norm-enforcing institution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37: 275–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. and Kiper, J. 2017. Sacred versus Secular Values: Cognitive and Evolutionary Sciences of Religion and Religious Freedom. In Homo Religiosus? Exploring the Roots of Religion and Religious Freedom in Human Experience, eds. T.S. Shah and J. Friedman, pp. 89–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., Phillips, E., and Alcorta, C.S. 2012. Sacrifice and Sacred Values: Evolutionary Perspectives On Religious Terrorism, in T. Shackelford and V. Weekes-Shackelford (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Violence, Homicide, and War, pp. 233–53. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. and J. Shaver 2015. How rituals elicit shared sacred values. Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie 3:75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, M.E. 1952. Ghosts, Ifaluk, and teleological functionalism. American Anthropologist, 54:497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. and R. Finke 2000. Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P.E. 2003. Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 320–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P. 1957. Dynamics of Faith. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimingham, J.S. 1971. The Sufi Orders in Islam. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuzin, D. 1997. The cassowary’s revenge: the life and death of masculinity in a New Guinea society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. 1972. The History and Status of General Systems Theory. The Academy of Management Journal, 15: 407–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A.F.C. 1966. Religion: An Anthropological View. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, J., Sheehan, O., Atkinson, Q.D., Bulbulia, J., & Gray, R.D. 2017. Ritual human sacrifice promoted and sustained the evolution of stratified societies. Nature, 532(7598), 228–231.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. 1995. Inside the cult: Religious innovation and transmission in Papua New Guinea. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. 2004. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. New York: Alta Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S., Hartberg, Y., MacDonald, I., Lanman, J.A., & Whitehouse, H. 2017. The nature of religious diversity: a cultural ecosystem approach. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(2), 134–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worsley, P. 1957. The trumpet shall sound. London: MacGibbon & Kee.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the James Barnett Endowment for support and Michael Price, John Smart, and Connor Wood for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, CT, USA

    Richard Sosis

Authors
  1. Richard Sosis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Sosis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA

    Georgi Yordanov Georgiev

  2. Acceleration Studies Foundation, Los Gatos, CA, USA

    John M. Smart

  3. Department of Biology, Institute of Zoology, Molecular Evolutionary Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Claudio L. Flores Martinez

  4. Department of Life Sciences, Centre for Culture and Evolution, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK

    Michael E. Price

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sosis, R. (2019). The Building Blocks of Religious Systems: Approaching Religion as a Complex Adaptive System. In: Georgiev, G., Smart, J., Flores Martinez, C., Price, M. (eds) Evolution, Development and Complexity. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00075-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation