Skip to main content

Relation Extraction for Knowledge Base Completion: A Supervised Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Semantic Web Challenges (SemWebEval 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 927))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 378 Accesses

Abstract

This paper outlines our approach to the extraction on predefined relations from unstructured data (OKE Challenge 2018: Task 3). Our solution uses a deep learning classifier receiving as input raw sentences and a pair of entities. Over the output of the classifier, expert rules are applied to delete known erroneous relations. For training the system we gathered data by aligning DBPedia relations and Wikipedia pages. This process was mainly automatic, applying some filters to refine the training records by human supervision. The final results show that the combination of a powerful classifier model with expert knowledge have beneficial implications in the final performance of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Freebase data dumps https://developers.google.com/freebase/.

  2. 2.

    NLP Interchange Format http://persistence.uni-leipzig.org/nlp2rdf/.

  3. 3.

    Spacy https://spacy.io/.

  4. 4.

    Pytorch http://pytorch.org/.

  5. 5.

    This last capability was discarded due to its bad performance.

  6. 6.

    The “anchor” is the textual representation of an entity in a sentence.

  7. 7.

    https://project-hobbit.eu/.

References

  1. Auer, Sören, Bizer, Christian, Kobilarov, Georgi, Lehmann, Jens, Cyganiak, Richard, Ives, Zachary: DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, Karl, Choi, Key-Sun, Noy, Natasha, Allemang, Dean, Lee, Kyung-Il, Nixon, Lyndon, Golbeck, Jennifer, Mika, Peter, Maynard, Diana, Mizoguchi, Riichiro, Schreiber, Guus, Cudré-Mauroux, Philippe (eds.) ASWC/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., Weston, J.: Large-scale simple question answering with memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02075 (2015)

  3. Cannaviccio, M., Barbosa, D., Merialdo, P.: Accurate fact harvesting from natural language text in wikipedia with lector. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Web and Databases, p. 9. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, K., Manning, C.D.: Improving coreference resolution by learning entity-level distributed representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01323 (2016)

  5. Durrett, G., Klein, D.: Easy victories and uphill battles in Coreference resolution. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1971–1982 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Exner, P., Nugues, P.: Entity extraction: from unstructured text to DBpedia RDF triples. In: The Web of Linked Entities Workshop (WoLE 2012), pp. 58–69. CEUR (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lample, G., Ballesteros, M., Subramanian, S., Kawakami, K., Dyer, C.: Neural architectures for named entity recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01360 (2016)

  9. Li, X., Taheri, A., Tu, L., Gimpel, K.: Commonsense knowledge base completion. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), vol. 1, pp. 1445–1455 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, Z., et al.: A structured self-attentive sentence embedding. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., Jurafsky, D.: Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 2-Volume 2, pp. 1003–1011. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell, T., et al.: Never-ending learning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-15) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ostermann, S., Roth, M., Modi, A., Thater, S., Pinkal, M.: Semeval-2018 task 11: Machine comprehension using commonsense knowledge. In: Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 747–757 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paulus, R., Xiong, C., Socher, R.: A deep reinforced model for abstractive summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.04304 (2017)

  15. Riedel, S., Yao, L., McCallum, A.: Modeling relations and their mentions without labeled text. In: Balcázar, J.L., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Sebag, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6323, pp. 148–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15939-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Silva, V.S., Freitas, A., Handschuh, S.: Building a Knowledge Graph from Natural Language Definitions for Interpretable Text Entailment Recognition. ArXiv e-prints (June 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Socher, R., Chen, D., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.: Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 926–934 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Speer, R., Havasi, C.: Representing general relational knowledge in conceptnet 5. In: LREC, pp. 3679–3686 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tai, K.S., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Improved semantic representations from tree-structured long short-term memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.00075 (2015)

  20. Usbeck, R., et al.: Gerbil: general entity annotator benchmarking framework. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1133–1143. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, L.: Yuanfudao at semeval-2018 task 11: three-way attention and relational knowledge for commonsense machine comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.00191 (2018)

  22. Weston, J., Bordes, A., Yakhnenko, O., Usunier, N.: Connecting language and knowledge bases with embedding models for relation extraction, pp. 1366–1371 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, Y., et al.: Google’s neural machine translation system: bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144 (2016)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Héctor Cerezo-Costas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cerezo-Costas, H., Martín-Vicente, M. (2018). Relation Extraction for Knowledge Base Completion: A Supervised Approach. In: Buscaldi, D., Gangemi, A., Reforgiato Recupero, D. (eds) Semantic Web Challenges. SemWebEval 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 927. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00072-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00072-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00071-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00072-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics