Skip to main content

Prediction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Fetal Growth Restriction

Abstract

Although fetal growth restriction (FGR) is considered as the most common and complex problem of modern obstetrics, its prediction is still very low. FGR prediction can be performed in all trimesters, and since it is a multifactorial pathology, prediction must consider several components, such as clinical, biophysical, biochemical, and ultrasound findings. Studies have shown that combined markers, such as clinical features, ultrasound measures, uterine artery Doppler, and biochemical markers, used in algorithms can improve prediction. FGR can be classified as early or late, and studies in the literature show different prediction sensitivities for each category. The main predictors for early FGR were African ancestry, chronic hypertension, prior pregnancy affected with FGR, mean blood pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), PlGF, and sFlt-1 with a detection rate of 71.4%. For late FGR, the markers were chronic hypertension, autoimmune disease, prior pregnancy affected with FGR, smoking, nulliparity, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery PI, PlGF, and sFlt-1 with a detection rate of 63.5%. FGR screening remains a challenge, and numerous studies are being conducted with an aim of improving its sensitivity. Effective screening helps to identify patients at risk, who would then be monitored more frequently in an attempt to minimize adverse perinatal effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albu A, Anca A, Horhoianu V, Horhoianu I. Predictive factors for intrauterine growth restriction. J Med Life. 2014;7:165–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013;68:329–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gardosi J, Giddings S, Clifford S, Wood L, Francis A. Association between reduced stillbirth rates in England and regional uptake of accreditation training in customised fetal growth assessment. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberge S, Nicolaides K, Demers S, Hyett J, Chaillet N, Bujold E. The role of aspirin dose on the prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:110–120.e6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan MY, Poon LC, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, de Paco Matallana C, Akolekar R, et al. Prediction and prevention of small-for-gestational-age neonates: evidence from SPREE and ASPRE. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:52–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crovetto F, Triunfo S, Crispi F, Rodriguez-Sureda V, Dominguez C, Figueras F, et al. Differential performance of first-trimester screening in predicting small-for-gestational-age neonate or fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:349–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Poon LC, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Lai J, Nicolaides KH. Combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age at 11–13 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;33:16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crovetto F, Triunfo S, Crispi F, Rodriguez-Sureda V, Roma E, Dominguez C, et al. First-trimester screening with specific algorithms for early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:340–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Poljak B, Agarwal U, Jackson R, Alfirevic Z, Sharp A. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:493–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Cicero S, Bower S, Nicolaides KH. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review. J Mater Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:78–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, Bennasar M, Martínez JM, Puerto B, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:128–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crovetto F, Figueras F, Triunfo S, Crispi F, Rodriguez-Sureda V, Dominguez C, et al. First trimester screening for early and late preeclampsia based on maternal characteristics, biophysical parameters, and angiogenic factors. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:183–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Valiño N, Giunta G, Gallo DM, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 30–34 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Valiño N, Giunta G, Gallo DM, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 35–37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:203–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benton SJ, McCowan LM, Heazell AE, Grysnpan D, Hutcheon JA, Senger C, et al. Placental growth factor as a marker of fetal growth restriction caused by placental dysfunction. Placenta. 2016;42:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karagiannis G, Akolekar R, Sarquis R, Wright D, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small-for-gestation neonates from biophysical and biochemical markers at 11–13 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29:148–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Familiari A, Bhide A, Morlando M, Scala C, Khalil A, Thilaganathan B. Mid-pregnancy fetal biometry, uterine artery Doppler indices and maternal demographic characteristics: role in prediction of small-for-gestational-age birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:238–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Poon LC, Lesmes C, Gallo DM, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 19–24 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:437–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Basuki TR, Caradeux J, Eixarch E, Gratacós E, Figueras F. Longitudinal assessment of abdominal circumference versus estimated fetal weight in the detection of late fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1159/000485889.

  20. Miranda J, Triunfo S, Rodriguez-Lopez M, Sairanen M, Kouru H, Parra-Saavedra M, et al. Performance of third-trimester combined screening model for prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:353–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bakalis S, Peeva G, Gonzalez R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30–34 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:446–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Farina A. Systematic review on first trimester three-dimensional placental volumetry predicting small for gestational age infants. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36:135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guiot C, Gaglioti P, Oberto M, Piccoli E, Rosato R, Todros T. Is three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound useful in the assessment of placental perfusion in normal and growth-restricted pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:171–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Cristina Perez Zamarian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zamarian, A.C.P., de Jesus Cruz, J., Nardozza, L.M.M. (2019). Prediction. In: Nardozza, L., Araujo Júnior, E., Rizzo, G., Deter, R. (eds) Fetal Growth Restriction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00051-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00051-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00050-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00051-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics