Skip to main content

Entrepreneurs, Ecosystems, and Accelerators

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Observing Acceleration

Abstract

To understand the work that accelerators are asked to do around the world, it is first necessary to understand the interplay between entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial ecosystems. When navigating the paths from promising ideas to successful companies, entrepreneurs rely on a host of individuals, organizations, and institutions to close various knowledge, network, and capital gaps. For certain entrepreneurs developing certain business ideas in certain places, the breadth and depth of the local ecosystems allow this to happen; not with absolute certainty, but with sufficient regularity to ensure a steady stream of new high-growth companies. Just think about the many white male entrepreneurs starting technology companies in Silicon Valley. For other entrepreneurs, like the founders of Togo’s first cashew processor or an Indian off-grid energy provider, these local ecosystems are much less robust. Therefore, a host of accelerators are setting up to target underserved and underestimated entrepreneurs who start impact-oriented ventures in these entrepreneurial dead spaces. We round out this chapter by using survey data collected by GALI researchers to explore this impressive global growth of accelerators. This sets the stage and provides context for the many observations that are presented throughout this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Joseph Alois Schumpeter. 1942. Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy. Harper and Brothers.

  2. 2.

    Ernst Friedrich Schuhmacher. 1973. Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. Blond & Briggs.

  3. 3.

    See www.whysgbs.org/sgbsinaction

  4. 4.

    See http://simpanetworks.com/

  5. 5.

    See http://www.microclinictech.com/

  6. 6.

    See http://firststepstaffing.com/

  7. 7.

    US Homeless People Numbers Rise for First Time in Seven Years. BBC News (December 2017).

  8. 8.

    Wim Naudé. 2010. Entrepreneurship and Economic Development. Springer.

  9. 9.

    The Importance of Young Firms for Economic Growth. The Kauffman Foundation Entrepreneurship Policy Digest (September 2015).

  10. 10.

    Meghana Ayyagari, Asli Demirguc-Kunt & Vojislav Maksimovic. 2014. ‘Who creates jobs in developing countries?’ Small Business Economics, 43(1), 75–99.

  11. 11.

    See https://www.forbes.com/sites/willyfoote/2013/06/26/cracking-the-nut-on-jobs-qa-with-a-togolese-social-entrepreneur/#14937b7a1989

  12. 12.

    Ross Baird. 2017. The Innovation Blind Spot: Why We Back the Wrong Ideas―and What to Do About It. BenBella Books.

  13. 13.

    Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Diagnostic Toolkit. Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs (December 2013).

  14. 14.

    Paul N. Bloom & J. Gregory Dees. 2008. ‘Cultivate your ecosystem.’ Stanford Social Innovation Review (Winter 2008).

  15. 15.

    Erik Stam & Ben Spigel. 2017. ‘Entrepreneurial ecosystems.’ in R. Blackburn, D. De Clercq, J. Heinonen, & Z. Wang (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. London: SAGE.

  16. 16.

    The First Thing You Need to Know About Entrepreneurship Ecosystems. Endeavor Insight (July 2015).

  17. 17.

    Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Early-Stage Company Growth Dynamics. World Economic Forum (January 2014).

  18. 18.

    How to Create a Sustainable Business Ecosystem 101. Endeavor Insight.

  19. 19.

    Paul Robson, Charles Akuetteh, Ian Stone, Paul Westhead & Mike Wright. 2013. ‘Credit-rationing and entrepreneurial experience: Evidence from a resource deficit context.’ Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(5–6): 349–370.

  20. 20.

    Garry Bruton, Susanna Khavul, Donald Siegel & Mike Wright. 2015. ‘New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance, crowdfunding, and peer-to-peer innovations.’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1): 9–26.

  21. 21.

    Andrew Rogerson, Shelagh Whitley, Emily Darko & Gideon Rabinowitz. Why and How Are Donors Supporting Social Enterprises. Overseas Development Institute (April 2014).

  22. 22.

    Venture Philanthropists and Impact Investors: Sharing Collaboration Successes and Challenges. Toniic Institute & Shell Foundation (2016).

  23. 23.

    See https://www.revolution.com/entity/rotr/

  24. 24.

    Amy Cortese. Arlan Hamilton: The VC Taking Cold Calls from Underestimated Entrepreneurs. ImpactAlpha (January 2018).

  25. 25.

    C. Scott Dempwolf, Jennifer Auer & Michelle D’Ippolito. 2014. Innovation Accelerators: Defining Characteristics among Startup Assistance Organizations. Small Business Administration.

  26. 26.

    Charlotte Pauwels, Bart Clarysse, Mike Wright & Jonas Van Hove. 2016. ‘Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator.’ Technovation, 50: 13–24.

  27. 27.

    Thomas Kohler. 2016. ‘Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups.’ Business Horizons, 59(3): 347–357.

  28. 28.

    Ross Baird (2017). How you can help the entrepreneurs you care about succeed: Lessons from 26 Communities worldwide. Medium (April 2017).

  29. 29.

    Yael V. Hochberg. 2016. ‘Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: The seed accelerator model.’ Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 16.

  30. 30.

    See http://www.f6s.com/ and https://gust.com/

  31. 31.

    Daniel C. Fehder & Yael V. Hochberg. 2015. Accelerators and the Regional Supply of Venture Capital Investment. Working paper.

  32. 32.

    Sean M. Hackett & David M. Dilts. 2004. ‘A systematic review of business incubation research.’ The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1): 55–82.

  33. 33.

    Justin Peters. How a 1950s Egg Farm Hatched the Modern Startup Incubator. Wired (June 2017).

  34. 34.

    Eric Stokan, Lyke Thompson & Robert J. Mahu. 2015. ‘Testing the differential effect of business incubators on firm growth.’ Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4): 317–327.

  35. 35.

    Rustam Lalkaka. 1996. ‘Technology business incubators: critical determinants of success.’ Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 798(1): 270–290.

  36. 36.

    Frank T. Rothaermel & Marie Thursby. 2005. ‘University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance.’ Research Policy, 34(3): 305–320.

  37. 37.

    Alejandro S. Amezcua, Matthew G. Grimes, Steven W. Bradley & Johan Wiklund. 2013. ‘Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: a contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007.’ Academy of Management Journal, 56(6): 1628–1654; Eric Stokan, Lyke Thompson & Robert J. Mahu. 2015. ‘Testing the differential effect of business incubators on firm growth.’ Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4): 317–327.

  38. 38.

    See https://www.galidata.org/accelerators/directory/

  39. 39.

    Figure 2.1 underestimates the true count of accelerators because new organizations are emerging all the time. Also, the GALI research efforts are constrained by language barriers and so their numbers probably underestimate the number of organizations working in East Asia (and some other regions).

  40. 40.

    Many of the organizations in the GALI sample run multiple programs. However, the GALI survey is administered at the organization level and asks questions about the accelerator programs as a whole.

  41. 41.

    C. Scott Dempwolf, Jennifer Auer & Michelle D’Ippolito. 2014. Innovation Accelerators: Defining Characteristics among Startup Assistance Organizations. Small Business Administration.

  42. 42.

    There are some interesting funding differences when it comes to emerging-market accelerators. On average, the organizations that run accelerators from headquarters in high-income countries rely more on corporate funding. On the other hand, emerging-market programs rely slightly more on philanthropic and government support. Emerging-market accelerators also rely more on fees paid by participating ventures (9 percent compared to 1 percent of the high-income country accelerators) and on consulting services (7 percent compared to 4 percent the high-income country accelerators) as their primary source of income.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roberts, P.W., Lall, S.A. (2019). Entrepreneurs, Ecosystems, and Accelerators. In: Observing Acceleration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00042-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics