Skip to main content

Methodologies and Strategies for Critical Infrastructure Protection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience

Abstract

The protection of critical infrastructures at a national level is not a trivial task. In involves various steps such as the indentation, the prioritization and the protection of those infrastructures and services that are vital for the wellbeing of the society. Although some sectors, subsectors and services seem to be very important for all countries, others may differ in their significance based on the specific economic, environmental and social characteristics of each country. In this chapter we review existing methodologies and national strategies for critical infrastructure protection. We examine methodologies for identifying and assessing critical sectors and services, relying on top-down and bottom-up administrative approaches. We examine common practices that have been applied in various countries to identify critical infrastructures and to establish national protection plans. Finally, we describe a set of goals that are commonly found in different methodologies and best practices for critical infrastructure protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    UK under BREXIT process.

References

  1. Austin Smith (2017) Presidential Policy Directive 21:Implementation: an interagency security committee white paper. Interagency Security Committee

    Google Scholar 

  2. BKK Annual Report (2015) 10–13. Germany: federal office of civil protection and disaster assistance (BKK)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chris Boyer – AT&T (2017) Critical infrastructure partnership overview. AVP – global public policy. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/digital-security-in-critical-infrastructure/digital-security-workshop-february-2018-%20Boyer.pdf

  4. Council Directive 2008/114/EC (2008). Official J Eur Union 51: 75

    Google Scholar 

  5. Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience – PPD-21 (2013) Washington DC. Retrieved from https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/PPD-21-Critical-Infrastructure-and-Resilience-508.pdf

  6. EU Commission (2012) Review of the European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP)

    Google Scholar 

  7. EU Cybersecurity Dashboard: A Path to a Secure European Cyberspace (2015) BSA – the software alliance. Retrieved from http://cybersecurity.bsa.org/assets/PDFs/study_eucybersecurity_en.pdf

  8. European Commission (2007) European programme for critical infrastructure protection. Off J

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Commission (2005) Green paper on a European programme for critical infrastructure protection, Brussels, COM, pp 576. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52005DC0576

  10. French National Digital Security Strategy (2015) Secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale (SGDSN). Retrieved from https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/national-cyber-security-strategies/ncss-map/France_Cyber_Security_Strategy.pdf

  11. Gritzalis D, Stergiopoulos G, Kotzanikolaou P, Magos E, Lykou G (2016) Critical infrastructure protection: a holistic methodology for Greece. Conference on security of industrial control and cyber physical systems (CyberICPS). Springer, 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klaver M (2011) Good practices manual for CIP policies, for policy makers in Europe. Brussels: RECIPE. Retrieved from http://www.oiip.ac.at/fileadmin/Unterlagen/Dateien/Publikationen/FINAL_RECIPE_manual.pdf

  13. Kotzanikolaou P, Theoharidou M, Gritzalis D (2013) Assessing n-order dependencies between critical infrastructures. Int J Crit Infrastruct 9(1–2):93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luiijf E, Burger H, Klaver M, Marieke H (2003) Critical infrastructure protection in the Netherlands: a Quick-scan. EICAR Denmark, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review (2015) UK Government. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/478933/52309_Cm_9161_NSS_SD_Review_web_only.pdf

  16. National Strategy for CIP (2009) Federal Republic of Germany

    Google Scholar 

  17. Novotný P, Rostek P (2014) Perspective of cross-cutting criteria as a major instrument to determination of critical infrastructure in the Czech Republic. (Vol. 2). Research papers faculty of materials science and technology Slovak University of technology

    Google Scholar 

  18. Public Private Partnerships (PPP) – Cooperative models (2017) ENISA. Retrieved from ENISA: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/public-private-partnerships-ppp-cooperative-models

  19. Rossella M, Cédric L-B (2014) Methodologies for the identification of critical information infrastructure assets and services. Guidelines for charting electronic data communication networks, European union agency for network and information security. ENISA, Heraklion

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rossella M, Cédric L-B (2015) Methodologies for the identification of critical information infrastructure assets and services. ENISA. Brussels: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strategic Framework and Policy Statement on Improving the Resilience of Critical Infrastructure to Disruption from Natural Hazards (2010) London: UK Cabinet Office. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/strategic-framework-and-policy-statement-on-improving-the-resilience-of-critical-infrastructure-to-disruption-from-natural-hazards

  22. The Critical Infrastructure Protection in France. (2017). Paris: Secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale (SGDSN). Retrieved from Secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale: http://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/uploads/2017/03/plaquette-saiv-anglais.pdf

  23. The French White Paper on defence and national security (2013) Paris: permanent representation of France to NATO

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panayiotis Kotzanikolaou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petrakos, N., Kotzanikolaou, P. (2019). Methodologies and Strategies for Critical Infrastructure Protection. In: Gritzalis, D., Theocharidou, M., Stergiopoulos, G. (eds) Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00024-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00024-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00023-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00024-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics