Skip to main content

Video Quality Assessment Algorithm Based on Persistence-of-Vision Effect

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cloud Computing and Security (ICCCS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11064))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1909 Accesses

Abstract

In order to assess video quality more accurately, this paper proposes an improved video quality assessment algorithm based on persistence-of-vision effect. This algorithm firstly adopts region partitioning, Just Noticeable Difference (JND) model, etc. to assess the quality of a video single frame; then conducts perceptual weighting on the several affected frames based on persistence-of-vision effect when the video scene changes; and finally assesses the video quality by using linear correlation coefficient and Peirman correlation coefficient and compares with the performance of the traditional algorithm through experiments. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm in this paper can objectively describe the video quality and perform well in the materials with more radical scene changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tong, Y., Hu, W., Yang, D.: A review on the video quality assessment methods. J. Comput.-Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 18(5), 735–741 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rohaly, A.M., Corriveau, P.J., Libert, J.M., et al.: Video quality experts group: current results and future directions. In: Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 742–753. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donoho, D.L., et al.: Can recent innovations in harmonic analysis explain key findings in natural image statistics. J. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 12(23), 371–393 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E.P., Bovik, A.C.: Multiscale structural similarity for image quality asessment. In: Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1398–1402 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pinson, M.H., Wolf, S.: A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 50(3), 312–322 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, S.N., Ma, L., Ngan, K.N.: Full-reference video quality assessment by decoupling detail losses and additive impairments. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 22(7), 1100–1112 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuan, F., Huang, L.F., Yao, Y.: A video quality assessment algorithm based on human visual characteristics. J. Comput.-Aided Des. Comput. Graph. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chou, C.H., Li, Y.C.: A perceptually tuned subband image coder based on the measure of just-noticeable-distortion profile. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 5(6), 467–476 (1995). IEEE Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Appina, B., Manasa, K., Channappayya, S.S.: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics. ISSN 2379-190X:2012-2016 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou, Y.F., et al.: Double local Wiener filter image denoising algorithm based on mathematical morphology and direction window in wavelet domain. Syst. Eng. Electron. Technol. 29(8), 1238–1241 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, Y., Zhan, D.: Combined JND model image stitching elimination method. J. Electron. Inf. 39(10), 2404–2412 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Z.F., Liu, Y.H., Wang, Y., et al.: Human visual contrast resolution limit measurement based on digital image processing. J. Biomed. Eng. 25(5), 998–1002 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brunnstrom, K., Hands, D., Speranza, F., et al.: VQEG validation and ITU standardization of objective perceptual video quality metrics. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 26(3), 96–101 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seshadrinathan, K., Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A.C., et al.: Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 19(6), 1427–1441 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. LIVE video quality data base. http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/live_video.html. Accessed 08 Apr 2013

  16. Sheikh, H.R., Sabir, M.F., Bovik, A.C.: A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(11), 3440–3451 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seshadrinathan, K., Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A.C., et al.: A subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms. In: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pai Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, P., Liu, F., Gong, D. (2018). Video Quality Assessment Algorithm Based on Persistence-of-Vision Effect. In: Sun, X., Pan, Z., Bertino, E. (eds) Cloud Computing and Security. ICCCS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11064. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00009-7_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00009-7_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00008-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00009-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics