Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference List

  1. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindaul LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin. Orthop 235:148–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubagnac JM, Argenson JN, Esteve P, Roguin B (1992) The morphology of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg. Br 74:28–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fessy MH, Bejui J, Fischer LP, Bouchet A (1995) The upper end of the femur: dimensions of the endosteal canal. Surg. Radiol. Ann 17:155–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin. Orthop 257:10728.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epinette JA, Geesink RGT (1995) Radiographic assessment of Cementless Hip Prostheses: ARA, a proposal New Scoring System. Cahiers d’Enseignement de la SOFCOT, 51, Expansion Scientifique. Française, 11426, English vol, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gruen TA, Macneice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) Modes of failure of cemented stem type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin. Orthop 141:17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am 55:1629–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Delaunay C, Kapandji AI (1998) Survie à 10 ans des prothèses totales de Zweimuller en arthroplastie primaire non cimentée de hanche. Rev. Chir. Orthop 84: 412–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson RP, Deysine GR, Green MT (1996) Uncemented total hip arthroplasty using the CLS stem: a titanium alloy implant with a corundum blast finish. Results at a mean 6 years in a prospective study. J Arthrosplasty 11:286–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Poss R, Walker P, Spector M, et al (1988) Strategies for improving fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop 235:181–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Capello WN (1989) Fit the patient to the prosthesis: an argument against the routine use of custom hip implants. Clin. Orthop 249:56–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson DD, Walker PS, Granholm JW, Nelson PC, Fishman EK Magid D (1987) Design of custom hip stem prostheses using three-dimensional CT modeling. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 11:804–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Summer DR, Turner TM (1988) The effects of femoral component design features on femoral modeling. In: Non cemented total hip arthroplasty. 143–155 Edit: Fitzgerald R Raven Press, 1 Vol. New-York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walker PS, Schneeweis PB, Murphy S, Nelson P (1987) Strain and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prosthesis. J. Biomech 20:693–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Whiteside LA, Arima J, White SE, Branam L, Mac Carthy DS (1994) Fixation of the modular total hip femoral component in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop 298:84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Laine HJ, Lehto Muk, Moilanen T (2000) Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal. J Arthroplasty 1:86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SOballe K, Hansen ES, Rasmussen HB, Bunger C (1995) Fixation of porous coated versus HA coated implants. Cahiers d’Enseignement de la SOFCOT, 51 , Expansion Scient. Française, 71–84, Engl vol, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT (1996) Remodeling of bone around hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am 78:1226–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Onsten I, Carlsson AS, Sanzen L , Besjakov J (1996) Migration and wear of a hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis. A controlled roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg. Br 78:85–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Donnely WJ, Kobayashi A, Freeman MA, Chin TW, Yeo H, West M, Scott G (1997) Radiological and survival comparison of four methods of fixation of a proximal femoral stem. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br 79:351–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yee AJM , Kreder HK, Bookman I, Davey JR (1999) A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop 366:120–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Epinette JA (1995) HA-Coated Omnifit Stems in Primary Hip Replacement: Seven-Year Experience. Cahiers d’Enseignement de la SOFCOT, 51, Expansion Scientifique Française, 215–226, English vol, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barrack RL, Burke DW, Cook SD, Skinner HB, Harris WH (1993) Complications related to modularity of total hip components. J Bone Joint Surg. Br 75:688–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krigier JJ, Dujovne AR, Brooks CE (1994) Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop 298:27–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chmell MJ, Poss R (1995) Avantages et désavantages de la modularité des prothèses totales de hanche. Conférences d’Enseignement de la SOFCOT, 52, Expansion Scient. Française, 1–10, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cameron HU (1994) The two to six year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin. Orthop 298:47–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Andress HJ, Lob G, Kahl S, (1999) Development of a new modular titanium femoral prosthesis consisting of a head and shaft component. Indications, operation and optimization of the tapered socket connection. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol 9:13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gacon G, Philippe MP, Ray A, Hummer J, Hourlier H, Dambreville A (2001) Modularité métaphyso-diaphysaire et tiges fémorales sans ciment. Rev. Chir. Orthop 87:331–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Philippe, M.P., Gacon, G., Ray, A., Dambreville, A. (2004). Proximal Modularity in a Cementless HA-Coated Hip Replacement Assessment of Utility. In: Fifteen Years of Clinical Experience with Hydroxyapatite Coatings in Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0851-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0851-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-00508-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0851-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics