Abstract
Parastomal hernias are defined as fascial defects around enterostomies such as colo- or ileostomies. Also the creation of urological conduits can be complicated by parastomal herniation. Whereas the repair of incisional hernias is recommended whenever such a hernia can be detected and the hernia is growing or hurts the indication for surgical repair of parastomal hernias is much more restrictive (1). Only about 30% of patients with parastomal hernias undergo surgical repair. Today a rapidly growing and symptomatic parastomal hernia should be corrected. Symptoms may be problems with defecation especially in patients which use irrigation for controlled evacuation as well as problems concerning the stoma care. An emergency indication is represented by incarceration. The great number of patients who do not need surgical repair according to todays official opinion is clearly based on the lack of a safe and effective reparation principle. Conventional procedures result in sometimes more than 50% recurrence rate and local infections up to 30% (2–5).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Martin, L, Foster, G. Parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg (1996) 78: 81–84.
Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY. Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum (2001) 44: 266–270.
Tekkis PP, Kocher HM, Payne JG. The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair. Ann R Coll Surg (1999) 81: 140–141.
Byers JM, Steinberg JB, Postier RG. Repair of parastomal hernias using polypropylene mesh. Arch Surg (1992) 127: 1246–1247.
Kohler L. Parastomal hernia - technique and results. Zentralbl Chir (1997) 122: 889–892.
Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg (1994) 129: 413–418.
Klinge U, Si ZY, Zheng H, Schumpelick V, Bhardwaj RS, Klosterhalfen B. Collagen I/III and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 1 and 13 in the fascia of patients with incisional hernias. J Invest Surg (2001) 14: 47–54.
De Ruiter P, Bijnen AB. Successful local repair of paracolostomy hernia with a newly developed prosthetic device. Int J Colorectal Dis (1992) 7: 132–134.
Tekkis PP, Kocher HM, Payne JG. Parastomal hernia repair: modified thorlakson technique, reinforced by polypropylene mesh. Dis Colon Rectum (1999) 42: 1505–1508.
Kasperk R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and a prosthetic mesh in the sublay position. Am J Surg (2000) 179: 186–188.
Sugarbaker, PH. Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann. Surg. (1985) 201: 344–346.
Kozlowski PM, Wang PC, Winfield HN. Laparoscopic repair of incisional and parastomal hernias after major genitourinary or abdominal surgery. J Endourol (2001) 15: 175–179.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag France
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berger, D. (2003). Laparoscopic Paraostomal Hernia Repair: indications, technique, and results. In: Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0752-2_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0752-2_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-287-59755-8
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0752-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive