Skip to main content

Elastography for Prostate Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 666 Accesses

Abstract

Elastography (EG) is a method of evaluating tissues on the basis of stiffness (in other words: elasticity). EG does not assess the anatomy, rather the quality of a tissue, because it is presumed that the quality of a malignant tissue differs from that of a benign one – the malignant tissue is stiffer. The principles of EG were first described in 1987, and its application in imaging and in its detection of prostate cancer were first reported in 2002. Although it has existed for several years, its use has recently become more frequent. There are several ways for tissue excitation to create strain (compression, energy pulses, or vibrations), and various types of imaging, such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance, can be used to detect the tissue strain. Ultrasound is the most common medical imaging used in this application, and tissue stiffness is visualized through an elastogram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aboumarzouk OM, Ogston S, Huang Z, Evans A, Melzer A, Stolzenberg JU, Nabi G. Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal elastosonography (TRES) imaging for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2012;110(10):1414–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad S, Cao R, Varghese T, Bidaut L, Nabi G. Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2906-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aigner F, Pallwein L, Junker D, Schafer G, Mikuz G, Pedross F, Mitterberger MJ, Jaschke W, Halpern EJ, Frauscher F. Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25 ng/ml or greater and 4.00 ng/ml or less. J Urol. 2010;184(3):913–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J, Calliada F, Cantisani V, Correas JM, D’Onofrio M, Drakonaki EE, Fink M, Friedrich-Rust M, Gilja OH, Havre RF, Jenssen C, Klauser AS, Ohlinger R, Saftoiu A, Schaefer F, Sporea I, Piscaglia F. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: basic principles and technology. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980). 2013;34(2):169–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barr RG, Memo R, Schaub CR. Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. Ultrasound Q. 2012;28(1):13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozzini G, Colin P, Nevoux P, Villers A, Mordon S, Betrouni N. Focal therapy of prostate cancer: energies and procedures. Urol Oncol. 2013;31(2):155–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brock M, Eggert T, Palisaar RJ, Roghmann F, Braun K, Loppenberg B, Sommerer F, Noldus J, von Bodman C. Multiparametric ultrasound of the prostate: adding contrast enhanced ultrasound to real-time elastography to detect histopathologically confirmed cancer. J Urol. 2013;189(1):93–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brock M, von Bodman C, Palisaar RJ, Loppenberg B, Sommerer F, Deix T, Noldus J, Eggert T. The impact of real-time elastography guiding a systematic prostate biopsy to improve cancer detection rate: a prospective study of 353 patients. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2039–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, Carvalho F, Allaix D, Merrouche W, Couzigou P, de Ledinghen V. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2010;51(3):828–35.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cochlin DL, Ganatra RH, Griffiths DF. Elastography in the detection of prostatic cancer. Clin Radiol. 2002;57(11):1014–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Correas JM, Tissier AM, Khairoune A, Khoury G, Eiss D, Helenon O. Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: state of the art. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(5):551–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, Bojunga J, Correas JM, Gilja OH, Klauser AS, Sporea I, Calliada F, Cantisani V, D’Onofrio M, Drakonaki EE, Fink M, Friedrich-Rust M, Fromageau J, Havre RF, Jenssen C, Ohlinger R, Saftoiu A, Schaefer F, Dietrich CF. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: clinical applications. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980). 2013;34(3):238–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, Tanter M. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(5):487–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoyt K, Parker KJ, Rubens DJ. Real-time shear velocity imaging using sonoelastographic techniques. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(7):1086–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krouskop TA, Dougherty DR, Vinson FS. A pulsed Doppler ultrasonic system for making noninvasive measurements of the mechanical properties of soft tissue. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1987;24(2):1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Gradl J, Aigner F, Horninger W, Strasser H, Bartsch G, zur Nedden D, Frauscher F. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17(1):39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivaz H, Fleming I, Assumpcao L, Fichtinger G, Hamper U, Choti M, Hager G, Boctor E. Ablation monitoring with elastography: 2D in-vivo and 3D ex-vivo studies. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 2):458–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salomon G, Kollerman J, Thederan I, Chun FK, Budaus L, Schlomm T, Isbarn H, Heinzer H, Huland H, Graefen M. Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1354–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smeenge M, Barentsz J, Cosgrove D, de la Rosette J, de Reijke T, Eggener S, Frauscher F, Kovacs G, Matin SF, Mischi M, Pinto P, Rastinehad A, Rouviere O, Salomon G, Polascik T, Walz J, Wijkstra H, Marberger M. Role of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a consensus panel. BJU Int. 2012;110(7):942–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smeenge M, de la Rosette JJ, Wijkstra H. Current status of transrectal ultrasound techniques in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22(4):297–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taverna G, Magnoni P, Giusti G, Seveso M, Benetti A, Hurle R, Colombo P, Minuti F, Grizzi F, Graziotti P. Impact of real-time elastography versus systematic prostate biopsy method on cancer detection rate in men with a serum prostate-specific antigen between 2.5 and 10 ng/mL. ISRN Oncology. 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/584672.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Teng J, Chen M, Gao Y, Yao Y, Chen L, Xu D. Transrectal sonoelastography in the detection of prostate cancers: a meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2012;110(11 Pt B):E614–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsutsumi M, Miyagawa T, Matsumura T, Kawazoe N, Ishikawa S, Shimokama T, Shiina T, Miyanaga N, Akaza H. The impact of real-time tissue elasticity imaging (elastography) on the detection of prostate cancer: clinicopathological analysis. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12(4):250–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Walz J, Marcy M, Pianna JT, Brunelle S, Gravis G, Salem N, Bladou F. Identification of the prostate cancer index lesion by real-time elastography: considerations for focal therapy of prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2011;29(5):589–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu Y, Chen Y, Qi T, Jiang J, Qi J, Yu Y, Yao X, Guan W. Prostate cancer detection with real-time elastography using a bi-plane transducer: comparison with step section radical prostatectomy pathology. World J Urol. 2012. doi:10.1007/s00345-012-0922-1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Macek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Macek, P. (2015). Elastography for Prostate Cancer. In: Barret, E., Durand, M. (eds) Technical Aspects of Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0484-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0484-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0483-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0484-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics