Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

IRM du pelvis de l’homme et de la femme pp 235–245Cite as

Endométriose

  • Chapter

  • 642 Accesses

Résumé

L’endométriose pelvienne touche essentiellement le péritoine, les ovaires et les structures ou organes pelviens situés dans l’espace sous-péritonéal pelvien. Interrogatoire et examen clinique suggèrent le diagnostic qui sera affirmé par diverses méthodes d’imagerie qui déterminent les localisations exactes et l’extension de l’endométriose pelvienne. Dans ce chapitre, la valeur de l’IRM pour le diagnostic de l’endométriose pelvienne sera précisée, après en avoir rappelé sa technique de réalisation, la sémiologie IRM, sa performance diagnostique et sa place par rapport aux autres techniques d’imagerie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Clement MD (2002) Diseases of the peritoneum (including endometriosis). In: Kurman RJ, (ed) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. Springer-Verlag, 5th ed., New York, p. 729

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nisolle M, Donnez J (1997) Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities. Fertil Steril 68: 585–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, et al. (2004) Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology 232: 379–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapron C, Chopin N, Borghese B, et al. (2006) Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution. Hum Reprod 21: 1839–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, Pansini V, et al. (2002) Routine clinical examination is not sufficient for diagnosing and locating deeply infiltrating endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9: 115–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fauconnier A, Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, et al. (2002) Relation between pain symptoms and the anatomic location of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 78: 719–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duleba AJ (1997) Diagnosis of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 24: 331–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Adamson GD, Nelson HP (1997) Surgical treatment of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 24: 375–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bazot M, Darai E, Clement de Givry S, et al. (2003) Fast breath-hold T2-weighted MR imaging reduces interobserver variability in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Am J Roentgenol. 180: 1291–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bazot M, Thomassin I, Hourani R, et al. (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for deep pelvic endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24: 180–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bazot M, Darai E, Biau DJ, et al. (2011) Learning curve of transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of endometriomas assessed by the cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM). Fertil Steril 95: 301–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bazot M, Lafbnt C, Rouzier R, et al. (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopie sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 92: 1825–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Biscaldi E, Ferrero S, Fulcheri E, et al. (2007) Multislice CT enteroclysis in the diagnosis of bowel endometriosis. Eur Radiol 17:211–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bazot M, Gasner A, Ballester M, Darai E (2011) Value of thin-section oblique axial T2-weighted images to assess uterosacral ligament endometriosis. Hum Reprod 26: 346–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bazot M, Gasner A, Lafont C, et al. (2011) Deep pelvic endometriosis; limited additional diagnostic value of postcontrast in comparison with MR conventional images. Eur J Radiol 80: 331–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kinkel K, Chapron C, Balleyguier C, et al. (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 14: 1080–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bazot M, Darai E (2005) Sonography and MR imaging for the assessment of deep pelvic endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12: 178–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takeuchi H, Kuwatsuru R, Kitade M, et al. (2005) A novel technique using magnetic resonance imaging jelly for evaluation of rectovaginal endometriosis. Fertil Steril 83: 442–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chassang M, Novellas S, Bloch-Marcotte C, et al. (2010) Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 20:1003–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Redwine DB (1999) Ovarian endometriosis: a marker for more extensive pelvic and intestinal disease. Fertil Steril 72: 310–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arrive L, Hricak H, Martin MC (1989) Pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging. Radiology 171: 687–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, et al. (1991) Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 180: 73–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Outwater E, Schiebler ML, Owen RS, Schnall MD (1993) Characterization of hemorrhagic adnexal lesions with MR imaging: blinded reader study. Radiology 186: 489–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zawin M, McCarthy S, Scoutt L, Comite F (1989) Endometriosis: appearance and detection at MR imaging. Radiology 171: 693–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sampson JA (1921) Perforating hemorrhagic (chocolate) cysts of the ovary. Their importance and especially their relation to pelvic adenomas of endometrial type. Archives of Surgery 3: 245–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clement PB (1995) Nonneoplastic lesions of the ovary In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. 4th ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 597

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka YO, Yoshizako T, Nishida M, et al. (2000) Ovarian carcinoma in patients with endometriosis: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175: 1423–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Vieira M, et al. (2003) Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Hum Reprod 18: 157–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cornillie FJ, Oosterlynck D, Lauweryns JM, Koninckx PR (1990) Deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: histology and clinical significance. Fertil Steril 53: 978–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Squifflet J, Feger C, Donnez J (2002) Diagnosis and imaging of adenomyotic disease of the retroperitoneal space. Gynecol Obstet Invest 54 Suppl 1: 43–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chapron C, Vieira M, Chopin N, et al. (2004) Accuracy of rectal endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectal involvement for patients presenting with deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24: 175–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Abrao MS, Goncalves MO, Dias JA, Jr., et al. (2007) Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 22: 3092–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chamie LP, Blasbalg R, Goncalves MO, et al. (2009) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and preoperative assessment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 106: 198–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saba L, Guerriero S, Sulcis R, et al. (2010) Agreement and reproducibility in identification of endometriosis using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol 51: 573–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Darai E, Thomassin I, Barranger E, et al. (2005) Feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192: 394–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen BD, Georges NP, Hamper UM, Zerhouni EA (1994) Primary cervicovaginal endometriosis: sonographic findings with MR imaging correlation. J Ultrasound Med 13: 809–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chapron C, Liaras E, Fayet P, et al. (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging and endometriosis: deeply infiltrating endometriosis does not originate from the rectovaginal septum. Gynecol Obstet Invest 53: 204–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Regenet N, Metairie S, Cousin GM, Lehur PA (2001) Colorectal endometriosis. Diagnosis and management. Ann Chir 126: 734–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hottat N, Larrousse C, Anaf V, et al. (2009) Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment—initial results. Radiology 253: 126–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zwas FR, Lyon DT (1991) Endometriosis. An important condition in clinical gastroenterology. Dig Dis Sci 36: 353–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fein RL, Horton BF (1966) Vesical endometriosis: a case report and review of the literature J Urol 95: 45–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Donnez J, Spada F, Squifflet J, Nisolle M (2000) Bladder endometriosis must be considered as bladder adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 74: 1175–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Balleyguier C, Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, et al. (2002) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosing bladder endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9: 15–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fedele L, Piazzola E, Raffaelli R, Bianchi S (1998) Bladder endometriosis: deep infiltrating endometriosis or adenomyosis? Fertil Steril 69: 972–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Abrao MS, Dias JA, Jr, Bellelis P, et al. (2009) Endometriosis of the ureter and bladder are not associated diseases. Fertil Steril 91: 1662–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Redwine DB (1987) The distribution of endometriosis in the pelvis by age groups and fertility. Fertil Steril 47: 173–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Takahashi K, Okada S, Ozaki T, et al. (1994) Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis by magnetic resonance imaging using “fat-saturation” technique. Fertil Steril 62: 973–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Chiowanich P, et al. (1998) Dilated fallopian tubes: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 208: 463–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, et al. (1996) Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 199: 151–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Wang L (1998) Imaging features of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update 4: 337–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Darai E, Marpeau O, Thomassin I, et al. (2005) Fertility after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis: preliminary results. Fertil Steril. 84: 945–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France

    M. Bazot, I. Thomassin-Naggara & L. Jarboui

  2. Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France

    M. Ballester & É. Daraï

Authors
  1. M. Bazot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Thomassin-Naggara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Jarboui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Ballester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. É. Daraï
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Bazot .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bazot, M., Thomassin-Naggara, I., Jarboui, L., Ballester, M., Daraï, É. (2014). Endométriose. In: IRM du pelvis de l’homme et de la femme. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0428-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0428-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0428-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation