Résumé
Le traitement des masses annexielles reste la première indication chirurgicale en gynécologie et on recense un nombre important d’explorations pour la pathologie ovarienne bénigne [1]. Le rôle principal des différentes techniques d’imagerie est donc de déterminer les patientes pouvant être surveillées et de les distinguer de celles devant être traitées chirurgicalement [2]. De plus, la distinction entre tumeur bénigne, borderline et maligne permet au chirurgien de déterminer si une conservation annexielle est envisageable et de prévoir une voie cœlioscopique ou laparotomique. Il est donc important de pouvoir identifier au sein des tumeurs malignes les tumeurs borderline car le pronostic en termes de survie et en termes de fertilité chez la femme jeune sera radicalement différent [3–5].
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
Curtin JP (1994) Management of the adnexal mass. Gynecol Oncol 55: S42–46
Fauvet R, Boccara J, Dufournet C, et al. (2004) Restaging surgery for women with borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study. Cancer 100: 1145–51
Fauvet R, Boccara J, Dufournet C, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study. Ann Oncol 16: 403–10
Darai E, Tulpin L, Prugnolle H, et al. (2007) Laparoscopic restaging of borderline ovarian tumors. Surg Endosc 21: 2039–43
Morice P (2006) Borderline tumours of the ovary and fertility. Eur J Cancer 42: 149–58
Helewa ME, Krepart GV, Lotocki R (1986) Staging laparotomy in early epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154: 282–6
Massad LS Jr., Hunter VJ, Szpak CA, et al. (1991) Epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Obstet Gynecol 78: 1027–32
Wenzl R, Lehner R, Husslein P, Sevelda P (1996) Laparoscopic surgery in cases of ovarian malignancies: an Austria-wide survey. Gynecol Oncol 63: 57–61
Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Sciot C, et al. (1991) Epithelial tumors of the ovary: CT findings and correlation with US. Radiology 178: 811–8
Stein SM, Laifer-Narin S, Johnson MB, et al. (1995) Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164: 381–6
Rieber A, Nussle K, Stohr I, et al. (2001) Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177: 123–9
Orden MR, Jurvelin JS, Kirkinen PP (2003) Kinetics of a US contrast agent in benign and malignant adnexal tumors. Radiology 226: 405–10
Yazbek J, Raju SK, Ben-Nagi J, et al. (2008) Effect of quality of gynaecological ultrasonography on management of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 9: 124–31
Canis M, Pouly JL, Wattiez A, Mage G, et al. (1997) Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses suspicious at ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 89: 679–83
Ekerhovd E, Wienerroith H, Staudach A, Granberg S (2001) Preoperative assessment of unilocular adnexal cysts by transvaginal ultrasonography: a comparison between ultrasonographic morphologic imaging and histopathologic diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184: 48–54
Kinkel K, Lu Y, Mehdizade A, et al. (2005) Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization—meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 236: 85–94
Hricak H, Finck S, Honda G, Goranson H (1992) MR imaging in the evaluation of benign uterine masses: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced T1-weighted images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158: 1043–50
Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, et al. (1987) Ovarian cystic teratomas: MR imaging. Radiology 162: 669–73
Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, et al. (1991) Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 180: 73–8
Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, et al. (2000) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16: 500–5
Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Talerman A, Dunton C (1997) Ovarian fibromas and cystadenofibromas: MRI features of the fibrous component. J Magn Reson Imaging 7: 465–71
Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, et al. (2009) Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 19: 1544–52
Thomassin-Naggara I, Bazot M, Darai E, et al. (2008) Epithelial ovarian tumors: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 248: 148–59
Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, Van Trappen P, et al. (2003) Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180: 1297–304
Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, et al. (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for characterizing ovarian epithelial tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 25: 111–20
Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Nassar-Slaba J, et al. (2007) Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing between ovarian fibroma and subserous uterine leiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31: 236–42
Fujii S, Matsusue E, Kanasaki Y, et al. (2008) Detection of peritoneal dissemination in gynecological malignancy: evaluation by diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 18: 18–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Paris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomassin-Naggara, I., Darai, É., Bazot, M. (2014). IRM pelvienne et pathologie annexielle. In: IRM du pelvis de l’homme et de la femme. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0428-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0428-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0427-9
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0428-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)