Résumé
Les macrobiopsies ont révolutionné la prise en charge des foyers de microcalcifications en évitant les surveillances rapprochées, anxiogènes, et les interventions chirurgicales inutiles [1].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Références
Plantade R, Hammou JC, Fighiera M et al. (2004) Sous-estimation du cancer du sein par les macrobiopsies stéréotaxiques 11-Gauge assistées par le vide. J Radiol 85: 391–401
Sie A, Bryan DC, Gaines V et al. (2006) Multicenter evaluation of the breast lesion excision system, a percutaneous, vacuum-assisted, intact-specimen breast biopsy device. Cancer 107: 945–949
Killebrew LK, Oneson RH (2006) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience. Breast J 12: 302–308
Seror JY, Lesieur B, Scheuer-Niro B et al. (2012) Predictive factors for complete excision and underestimation of one-pass en bloc excision of non-palpable breast lesions with the Intact® breast lesion excision system. Eur J Radiol 81: 719–724
Allen SD, Nerurkar A, Guidabaldo U, Della Rovere Q (2011) The breast lesion excision system (BLES): a novel technique in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of small indeterminate breast lesions? Eur Radiol 21: 919–924
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag France, Paris
About this paper
Cite this paper
Plantade, R. (2013). Macrobiopsies diagnostiques : monoblocs ou fragmentaires ?. In: Acquis et limites en sénologie / Assets and limits in breast diseases. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0396-8_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0396-8_44
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0395-1
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0396-8