Advertisement

History of Telesurgery

  • James Wall
  • Jacques MarescauxEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The first generation of surgical robots was notable for performing image-guided precision tasks, but was limited by the need for preoperative planning and basic computer interfaces. The evolution of surgical robots has led to a current generation of real-time telemanipulators.

The development of telesurgery arose in the 1970s with the da Vinci® Surgical and the Zeus® system. The routine use of telesurgical applications is still under development. In addition to technical challenges, there are many medical-legal, billing and liability issues that must be resolved to enable telesurgery across state and national boundaries. Progress has been made in telementoring, where specialist surgeons can mentor local surgeons through telepresence.

Telesurgery remains in its infancy. Significant challenges remain for the field including the cost-effectiveness, access to bandwidth, regulations and adoption. Another current limitation is the lack of tactile feedback that removes the key aspect of feel from the surgeon’s hands.

Despite current limitations, the potential of surgical robotics and telesurgery is enormous. The ability to deliver surgical expertise to distant locations will benefit patients worldwide.

References

  1. 1.
    Allaf ME, Jackman SV, Schulam PG et al (1998) Laparoscopic visual field. Voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 12:1415–1418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cubano M, Poulose BK, Talamini MA et al (1999) Long distance telementoring. A novel tool for laparoscopy aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. Surg Endosc 13:673–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gagner M, Begin E, Hurteau R et al (1994) Robotic interactive laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 343:596–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F et al (1988) The Probot – an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 211:317–325Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA et al (1988) A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35:153–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 27:379–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW et al (1996) Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 10:107–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nebot PB, Jain Y, Haylett K et al (2003) Comparison of task performance of the camera-holder robots EndoAssist and Aesop. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:334–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Omote K, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A et al (1999) Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control. Am J Surg 177:321–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rayman R, Croome K, Galbraith N et al (2007) Robotic telesurgery: a real-world comparison of ground- and satellite-based internet performance. Int J Med Robot 3:111–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sackier JM, Wang Y (1994) Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development. Surg Endosc 8:63–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Satava RM (1999) Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch Surg 134:1197–1202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schlachta CM, Lefebvre KL, Sorsdahl AK et al (2010) Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 24:841–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Unger SW, Unger HM, Bass RT (1994) AESOP robotic arm. Surg Endosc 8:1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wagner AA, Varkarakis IM, Link RE et al (2006) Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study. Urology 68:70–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRCAD, Department of General, Digestive and Endocrine SurgeryUniversity Hospital of StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations