Skip to main content

History of Telesurgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The first generation of surgical robots was notable for performing image-guided precision tasks, but was limited by the need for preoperative planning and basic computer interfaces. The evolution of surgical robots has led to a current generation of real-time telemanipulators.

The development of telesurgery arose in the 1970s with the da Vinci® Surgical and the Zeus® system. The routine use of telesurgical applications is still under development. In addition to technical challenges, there are many medical-legal, billing and liability issues that must be resolved to enable telesurgery across state and national boundaries. Progress has been made in telementoring, where specialist surgeons can mentor local surgeons through telepresence.

Telesurgery remains in its infancy. Significant challenges remain for the field including the cost-effectiveness, access to bandwidth, regulations and adoption. Another current limitation is the lack of tactile feedback that removes the key aspect of feel from the surgeon’s hands.

Despite current limitations, the potential of surgical robotics and telesurgery is enormous. The ability to deliver surgical expertise to distant locations will benefit patients worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allaf ME, Jackman SV, Schulam PG et al (1998) Laparoscopic visual field. Voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 12:1415–1418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cubano M, Poulose BK, Talamini MA et al (1999) Long distance telementoring. A novel tool for laparoscopy aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. Surg Endosc 13:673–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gagner M, Begin E, Hurteau R et al (1994) Robotic interactive laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 343:596–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F et al (1988) The Probot – an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 211:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA et al (1988) A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35:153–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 27:379–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW et al (1996) Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 10:107–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nebot PB, Jain Y, Haylett K et al (2003) Comparison of task performance of the camera-holder robots EndoAssist and Aesop. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:334–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Omote K, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A et al (1999) Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control. Am J Surg 177:321–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rayman R, Croome K, Galbraith N et al (2007) Robotic telesurgery: a real-world comparison of ground- and satellite-based internet performance. Int J Med Robot 3:111–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sackier JM, Wang Y (1994) Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development. Surg Endosc 8:63–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Satava RM (1999) Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch Surg 134:1197–1202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlachta CM, Lefebvre KL, Sorsdahl AK et al (2010) Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 24:841–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Unger SW, Unger HM, Bass RT (1994) AESOP robotic arm. Surg Endosc 8:1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner AA, Varkarakis IM, Link RE et al (2006) Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study. Urology 68:70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Marescaux MD,(Hon)FRCS,FACS,(Hon)JSES .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wall, J., Marescaux, J. (2013). History of Telesurgery. In: Liverneaux, P., Berner, S., Bednar, M., Parekattil, S., Mantovani Ruggiero, G., Selber, J. (eds) Telemicrosurgery. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0391-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0391-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0390-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0391-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics