Advertisement

Réduire la morbidité maternelle

  • E. Morau
  • J. Pastor
  • G. Criballet
  • J. Dubourdieu
  • A. Bonnal
  • P. Boulot

Résumé

L’étude de la morbidité maternelle comme suivi de la santé maternelle est proposée en relais de l’étude de la mortalité maternelle. évaluer la prise en charge des pathologies composant la morbidité maternelle est un projet ambitieux pour proposer des pistes d’amélioration au niveau régional et local. Ces pistes d’amélioration pourraient se décliner en : Dépister, Orienter, Anticiper, Coordonner, Communiquer.

Mots clés

morbidité maternelle réseau de santé amélioration des pratiques 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. 1.
    Danel I, Berg C, Johnson CH, Atrash H (2003) Magnitude of maternal morbidity during labor and delivery: United States, 1993–1997. Am J Public Health 93: 631–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tunçalp O, Hindin M, Souza J, et al. (2012) The prevalence of maternal near miss: a systematic review. BJOG 119: 653–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang WH, Alexander S, Bouvier-colle MH, Macfarlane A, the MOMS-B Group (2005) Incidence of severe pre-eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis as a surrogate marker for severe maternal morbidity in a European population-based study: the MOMS-B survey. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112: 89–96Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watersone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C (2001) Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ 322: 1089–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zwart JL, Richters JM, De Vries JIP (2008) Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of 371000 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 115: 842–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rapport du Comité national d’experts sur la mortalité maternelle (CNEMM)-2001–2006 (2010) Disponible en ligne. http://www.invs.sante.fr/publicationsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewis G (2011) The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mother’s Lives: reviewing maternal death to make motherhood safer, 2006–2008. London: The eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. Available online at: http://www.cemach.org.ukGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oackley C, Child A, Jung B, et al. (2003) Expert consensus document on management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J 24: 761–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siu SC, Sermer M, Colman JM, et al. (2001) Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation 104: 515–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jastrow N, Meyer P, Khairy P, et al. (2011) Prediction of complications in pregnant women with cardiac diseases referred to a tertiary center. Int J Cardiol 151: 209–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bell R, Bailey K, Cresswell T, et al. (2008) Trends in prevalence and outcomes of pregnancy in women with pre-existing type I and type II diabetes. BJOG 115: 445–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahmud, Mazza (2010) Preconceptional care of women with diabetes: a review of current guideline recommendations. BMC Women’s Health 10: 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arendas K, Qiu Q, Gruslin A (2008) Obesity in pregnancy: pre-conceptional to postpartum consequences. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 30: 477–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mhyre JM, Bateman BT, Leffert LR (2011) Influence of patient comorbidities on the risk of near-miss maternal morbidity or mortality. Anesthesiology 115: 963–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kiely DG, Condliffe R, Webster V, et al. (2010) Improved survival in pregnancy and pulmonary hypertension using a multiprofessional approach. BJOG 117: 565–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eller AG, Bennett MA, Sharshiner, et al. (2011) Maternal morbidity in cases of placenta accreta managed by a multidisciplinary care team compared with standard obstetric care. Obstet Gynecol 117: 331–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gao H, Mc Donnell A, Harrisson D A, et al. (2007). Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Med 33: 667–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swanton RD, Al-Rawi S, Wee MY (2009) A national survey of obstetric early warning systems in the United Kingdom 18: 253–257Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh S, Mc Glennan A, England A, et al. (2012) A validation study of the CEMACH recommended modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS). Anaesthesia 67: 12–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldhill DR, Mc Narry AF, Mandersloot G, McGinley A (2005) A physiologically-based early warning score for ward patients: the association between score and outcome. Anaesthesia 60: 547–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hémorragies du post-partum immédiat: recommandations pour la pratique clinique (2004) Disponible en ligne: http://www.cngof.asso.fr/d_pages/purpc_12.htmGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prise en charge multidisciplinaire des formes graves de prééclampsie (2009) Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 28: 275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mathe ML, Morau E, Vernhet-Kovacsik H, et al. (2007) Impact of the new French clinical practice recommendations in embolization in postpartum and post-abortion hemorrhage: study of 48 cases. J Perinat Med 35: 532–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Audureau E, Deneux-Tharaux C, Lefèvre P (2009) Practices for prevention, diagnosis and management of postpartum haemorrhage: impact of a regional multifaceted intervention. BJOG 116: 1325–1333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Circulaire DHOS/01/03/CNAMTS no 2006-151 du 30 mars 2006 relative au cahier des charges national des réseaux de santé en perinatalitéGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    HAS (2009) Revue de morbi-mortalité (RMM). Paris: HAS http://www.has-sante.frGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dupont C, Touzet S, Colin C, et al. (2009) Incidence and management of postpartum haemorrhage following the dissemination of guidelines in a network of 16 maternity units in France. Int J Obstet Anesth 18: 320–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Branger B, Gillard P Monrigal C, et al. (2011) Leçons et impact de deux audits sur les hémorragies du post partum dans les 24 maternités du réseau «Sécurité Naîtie Ensemble» in « Pays-de-la-Loire» area. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 40: 657–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huissoud C, du Mesnildot P, Sayegh I et al. (2009) La mise en oeuvre des codes couleurs réduit le délai décision naissance des césariennes urgentes. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 38: 51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Birch L, Jones N, Doyle PM, et al. (2007) Obstetric skills drills: evaluation of teaching methods. Nurse Educ Today 27: 915–922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Van Hanegem N, Miltenburg AS, Zwart JJ, et al. (2011) Severe acute maternal morbidity in asylum seekers: a two-year nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90: 1010–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Morau
    • 1
  • J. Pastor
    • 1
  • G. Criballet
    • 1
  • J. Dubourdieu
    • 1
  • A. Bonnal
    • 1
  • P. Boulot
    • 1
  1. 1.Département d’anesthésie-réanimation DMontpellier cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations