Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Approche pratique en orthopédie - traumatologie ((APPRPRAT))

  • 755 Accesses

Résumé

Les fractures périprothétiques sont classiquement réputées rares. La réelle incidence de ces fractures est imprécise et le recours aux registres de prothèses est particulièrement utile. Le registre suédois des prothèses de hanche rapporte la fracture isolée comme cause de reprise chirurgicale de la prothèse dans 5 % des cas sur 14 000 prothèses. Dans son registre de 30 000 prothèses, la Mayo Clinic, sur une période de 30 ans trouve 4,1 % de fractures périprothétiques de hanche. De ces résultats, Lindahl et al. estiment l’incidence entre 1 et 2 % pour les fractures périprothétiques de hanche, de loin les plus fréquentes [1]. Si l’on retient la fourchette haute de 2 % pour l’ensemble des fractures périprothétiques, cela correspond à l’incidence des fractures du col du fémur. L’incidence des fractures périprothétiques de genou, intéressant l’extrémité distale du fémur, varie de 0,3 % à 2,5 %; Felix rapporte 0,6 % de fractures tibiales sur la série de 17 727 prothèses de genou réalisée en 25 ans à la Mayo Clinic [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20(7): 857–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Felix NA, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD (1997) Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (345): 113–24

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abendschein W (2003) Periprosthetic femur fractures—a growing epidemic. Am J Orthop 32(9 Suppl): 34–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnevialle P, Féron JM (2003) Les fractures des sujets âgés de plus de 80 ans. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 89 (Suppl 5): 32–75

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bégué T, Thomazeau H (2006) Fractures périprothétiques autour de la hanche et du genou. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 92 (Suppl 2): 29–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindahl H, Oden A, Garellick G, Malchau H (2007) The excess mortality due to periprosthetic femur fracture. A study from the Swedish national hip arthroplasty register. Bone 40(5): 1294–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res (420): 80–95

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tadross TS, Nanu AM, Buchanan MJ, Checketts RG (2000) Dall-Miles plating for periprosthetic B1 fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty 15(1): 47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsiridis E, Spence G, Garnie Z, et al. (2007) Grafting for periprosthetic femoral fractures: strut, impaction or femoral replacement. Injury 38(6): 688–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giannoudis PV, Kanakaris NK, Tsiridis E (2007) Principles of internal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury 38(6): 669–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chakravarthy J, Bansal R, Cooper J (2007) Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures of femur: a report on 12 patients. Injury 38(6): 725–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Althausen PL, Lee MA, Finkemeier CG et al. (2003) Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of four treatment methods. J Arthroplasty 18(7): 834–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wood GC, Naudie DR, McAuley J, McCalden RW (2011) Locking compression plates for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed total hip and knee implants. J Arthroplasty 26(6): 886–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bégué T, Tricoire JL, Veillard D, et al. (2006) Periprosthetic fractures around total hip and knee arthroplasty. Therapeutic algorithm for periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92 (5 Suppl): 2S90–2S96 358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim KI, Egol KA, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2006) Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res (446): 167–75

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kobbe P, Klemm R, Reilmann H, Hockertz TJ (2008) Less invasive stabilisation system (LISS) for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: a 3-year follow-up. Injury 39(4): 472–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ehlinger M, Adam P, Moser T, et al. (2010) Type C periprosthetic fractures treated with locking plate fixation with a mean follow up of 2.5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(1): 44–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ehlinger M, Bonnomet F, Adam P (2010) Periprosthetic femoral fractures: the minimally invasive fixation option. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(3): 304–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sah AP, Marshall A, Virkus WV, et al. (2010) Interprosthetic fractures of the femur: treatment with a single-locked plate. J Arthroplasty 25(2): 280–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Friesecke C, Plutat J, Block A (2005) Revision arthroplasty with use of a total femur prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(12): 2693–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ortiguera CJ, Berry DJ (2002) Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(4): 532–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steinmann SP, Cheung EV (2008) Treatment of periprosthetic humerus fractures associated with shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16(4): 199–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wright TW, Cofield RH (1995) Humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(9): 1340–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kent ME, Sinopidis C, Brown DJ, Frostick SP (2005) Frostick SP. The locking compression plate in periprosthetic humeral fractures. A review of two cases Injury 36(10): 1241–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, et al. (2009) Results after 562 total elbow replacements: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(3): 449–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Driscoll SW, Morrey BF (1999) Periprosthetic fractures about the elbow. Orthop Clin North Am 30(2): 319–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanchez-Sotelo J, O’Driscoll S, Morrey BF (2002) Periprosthetic humeral fractures after total elbow arthroplasty: treatment with implant revision and strut allograft augmentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(9): 1642–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Plausinis D, Greaves C, Regan WD, Oxland TR (2005) Ipsilateral shoulder and elbow replacements: on the risk of periprosthetic fracture. Clin Biomech 20(10): 1055–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Carroll EA, Lorich DG, Helfet DL (2009) Surgical management of a periprosthetic fracture between a total elbow and total shoulder prostheses: a case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(3):e9–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.-M. Féron .

Editor information

Sylvain Terver Frédéric Martins-Condé Bernard Leblanc

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Féron, JM. (2013). Fractures périprothétiques. In: Terver, S., Martins-Condé, F., Leblanc, B. (eds) Orthopédie-traumatologie de la personne âgée fragile. Approche pratique en orthopédie - traumatologie. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0377-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0377-7_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0376-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0377-7

Publish with us

Policies and ethics