Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Piloter la sécurité pp 25–57Cite as

L’erreur humaine au centre des débats sur la sécurité

  • Chapter

  • 557 Accesses

Résumé

Ce chapitre est centré sur la découverte du modèle de sécurité utilisée par les individus pour réaliser leur travail sans incident ou accident. Il donne une perspective micro sur la sécurité. Son contenu reprend une synthèse du livre sur la conduite des systèmes à risques publié en 1996, augmentée des travaux plus récents sur les biais communs de l’analyse des erreurs, et l’importance des concepts de suffisance, de compromis, d’arbitrages, et du rôle central des routines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Lewin Kurt (1935) A dynamic theory of personality. Mc Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duncker K (1945) On Problem Solving. Psychological Monographs 58: 270.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Broadbent D (1958) Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63: 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shiffrin R, Schneider W (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review 84: 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wickens C (1984) Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norman D A, Shallice T (1986) Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. Consciousness and self-regulation. Davidson GS, Shapiro D. New York, Plenum Press 4: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Norman D (1981) Categorization of action slips. Psychological review 88: 1–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Jens Rasmussen est un ingénieur visionnaire, autodidacte des facteurs humains, capable de lire et faire des ponts entre courants théoriques qui s’ignorent entre eux. Il va réorienter sa carrière vers la fiabilité technique et humaine à la suite de l’accident nucléaire de Three-Miles Island aux États-Unis en mars 1979. Il va devenir un des pionniers des approches modernes sur la sécurité des systèmes complexes. Il influencera profondément toute une génération de chercheurs qui ont été ses élèves directs, notamment James Reason, Erik Hollnagel, Dave Woods, et... l’auteur de ce livre.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rasmussen J. (1983) Skills, rules, knowledge: signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 13: 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reason J. Human error, Cambride University Press, 1990, traduit en Français PUF, Paris, 1993; traduit en espagnol, Modus Laborandi, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fioratou E, Flin R, Glavin R (2012) No simple fix for fixation errors: cognitive processes and their clinical implications. Anesthesia 65: 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Besnard D, Greathead D, Baxter G (2004) When mental models go wrong: co-occurrences in dynamic, critical systems. Int J Human-Computer Studies 60: 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayes J, Flower L (1980) Identifying the organization of writing processes. Cognitive processes in rriting. L. Gregg, Steinberg, E. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Allwood C, Montgomery H (1982) Detection errors in statistical problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 23: 131–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Allwood CM (1984) Error detection processes in statistical problem solving. Cognitive science 8: 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wioland L, Amalberti R (1996, November 12–15). When errors serve safety: towards a model of ecological safety. In: First Asian conference on Cognitive Systems Engineering in Process Control (CSEP 96), sous la dir. de E. Hollnagel. Kyoto, Japan: 184–191.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Doireau P, Wioland L, Amalberti R (1997) La détection des erreurs par des opérateurs extérieurs à l’action: le cas du pilotage d’avion. Le Travail Humain 60: 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rizzo A, Bagnara S, Visciola M (1987) Human error detection process. International Journal Man-Machine Studies 27: 555–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amalberti R, Wioland L (1997) Human error in Aviation. Key note address at the International Aviation Safety Conference 1997 (IASC-97), Rotterdam Airport. In: H. Shoekkha ed, Aviation Safety, VSP BV: The Netherlands, p. 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Helmreich R (2000) On error management: lessons from aviation. Br Med J 320: 781–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Amalberti R (2001) La conduite des systèmes à risques. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Keyser V (1996) Les erreurs temporelles et les aides techniques. In: La gestion du temps dans les environnements dynamiques, sous la dir. de Cellier JM, De Keyser V, Valot C. Paris: PUF, p. 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ghaferi A, Birkmeyer J, Dimick J (2009) Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med 361: 1368–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dekker S (2006) Ten questions about human errors. Avebury-Ashgate Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson C, Holloway C (2004) Systemic failures and human error in Canadian aviation reports between 1996 and 2002. In: HCI in Aerospace 2004, sous la dir. de Pritchett A et Jackson A, Eurisco, Toulouse, p. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson C (2004) Human Error and the Failure of Imagination, In: Human Error, Safety and Systems Development, sous la dir. de CW Johnson, P. Palanque, Préface. Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Norman D (1983) Some observations on mental models. In: Mental models, sous la dir. de G. Stevens et S. Gentner. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ochanine D (1981) L’image opérative, actes d’un séminaire et recueil d’articles. Université Paris V.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Piaget J (1974) La prise de conscience. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Simon H (1982) Models of bounded rationality, vol. 1. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Falzon P, Amalberti R, Carbonell N (1986) Dialogue control strategies in oral communication. In: The future of command languages: foundations for Human Computer communication, sous la dir. de D. Hopper et IA Newman. North Holland: Elsevier Science Publisher, p. 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hoc J M (1988) Cognitive psychology of planning. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. O’Hara K, Payne S (1998) The effects of operator implementation cost on planfulness of problem solving and learning, Cognitive Psychology 35: 34–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Hara K, Payne S (1999) Planning and the user interface: the effect of lockout time and error recovery cost. International Journal Human Computer Studies 50: 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Amalberti R (2001) La maîtrise des situations dynamiques. Psychologie Française 46-2: 105–117

    Google Scholar 

  37. Amalberti R (2002) Use and misuse of safety models in design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2485: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Klein G, Zsambok CE (1997). Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gibson J (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Cambridge, Ma: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Le terme affordance est un néologisme provenant de l’anglais, signifiant l’idée d’inciter, d’inviter. Il se rapporte à une structure physique de l’environnement qui favorise spontanément une action particulière sur cette structure physique (par exemple pousser ou tirer une porte en fonction de la forme de la poignée) (voir Norman D (1988) The design of everyday things. New York: Double Day Curency, pour un développement du concept inspiré de Gibson).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gibson J, Crooks L (1938) A theoretical field analysis of automobile-driving. American Journal of Psychology 51: 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Newell A, Simon H (1972) Human problem solving. Englewoods Cliffs, NY, Prentice HAll.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maturana H, Varela F (1992) The tree of knowledge, the biological roots of natural understanding. Shambala publications.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zangh J, Norman DA (1994) Representation in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science 18: 87–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Noizet A, Amalberti R (2000) Le contrôle cognitif des activités routinières des agents de terrain en centrale nucléaire: un double système de contrôle. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle 14(1–2): 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hoc JM, Amalberti R (2007) Cognitive control dynamics for reaching a satisficing performance in complex dynamic situations. Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making 1: 22–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Valot C, Amalberti R (1992) Metaknowledge for time and reliability. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety 36: 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cellier JM, de Keyser V, Valot C (1996) La gestion du temps dans les environnements dynamiques. PUF: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Morineau T, Hoc JM, Denecker P (2003) Cognitive control levels in air traffic radar controller activity. Int Journal of Aviation Psychology 13: 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Endsley M (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37: 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Plat M, Amalberti R (2000) Experimental crew training to deal with automation surprises. In: Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain, sous la dir. de NSR Amalberti, Hillsdale-New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, p. 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Valot C, Amalberti R (1992) Metaknowledge for time and reliability. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety 36: 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Marc J, Amalberti R (2002) Contribution de l’individu au fonctionnement sûr du collectif: l’exemple de la régulation du SAMU. Le Travail Humain 64: 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Amalberti R, Brami J (2011) Tempos management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety, BMJ Quality & Safety Online First, published on 2 September 2011 as 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.048710.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Brami J, Amalberti R (2009) Les risques en médecine générale. Springer Verlag France: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Barber N (2002) Should we consider non-compliance a medical error? Qual Saf Health Care 11:81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Buetow S, Kiata L, Liew T, et al. (2009) Patient error: a preliminary taxonomy. Ann Fam Med 7: 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Amalberti R (2001) La conduite des systèmes à risques. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  60. De Tersac G, Mignard J (2011) Les paradoxes de la sécurité, le cas d’AZF. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society. Safety Science 27: 183–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Polet P, Vanderhaegen F, Amalberti R (2003) Modelling the border-line tolerated conditions of use. Safety Science 41: 111–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. McCammmon I (2004) Heuristics traps in recreational avalanche accidents: evidence and implications. Avalanche News: 68.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dorner D (1997) The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Amalberti R (1998) Automation in Aviation: a human factors perspective. In: Aviation human factors, sous la dir. de JWDH D. Garland. Hillsdale-New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, p. 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hollnagel E (2009) The ETTO principle. Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off, Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. René Amalberti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amalberti, R. (2013). L’erreur humaine au centre des débats sur la sécurité. In: Piloter la sécurité. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0369-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0369-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0368-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0369-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation