Skip to main content

Occlusion de la veine grande saphène par radiofréquence et voie veineuse transcutanée

  • Chapter
  • 1035 Accesses

Résumé

L’occlusion par radiofréquence de la grande veine saphène (GVS) appelée aussi système de thermo-ablation segmentaire par sonde ClosureFast (CLF) est un traitement endoveineux thermique d’occlusion sélective de la GVS. Il s’agit d’un procédé peu invasif, non douloureux et très efficace permettant une occlusion veineuse dans plus de 97 % des cas. Il s’applique uniquement aux troncs veineux saphènes. Depuis avril 2008, la Haute autorité de santé a émis une recommandation favorable pour utiliser le CLF dans l’occlusion de la GVS entre la jarretière et la jonction saphéno-fémorale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Proebstle TM, Krummenauer F, Gül D, Knop J (2004) Non occlusion and early reopening of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment is fluence dependent. Dermatol Surg 30: 174–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lebard C, Zuccarelli F (2001) Destruction de la Grande Veine Saphène par le Système Closure. Phlébologie 54: 285–91

    Google Scholar 

  3. Merchant RF, Pichot O, Myers KA, Closure Study Group (2005) Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 42: 502–9; discussion 509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lebard C, Daniel C, Zuccarelli F (2009) Energy delivery during ClosureFast thermal ablation of great saphenous vein — XVI world meeting of the UIP Monaco

    Google Scholar 

  5. Proebstle TM, Vago B, Alm J et ClosureFast Europe Group (2008) Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: First clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 47: 151–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Creton D, Pichot O, Sessa C, ClosureFast Europe Group (2010) Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast procedure: results at 1 year. Ann Vasc Surg 24: 360–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Proebstle TM, Vago B, Alm J, ClosureFast Europe Group (2011) Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: Results at 3 years. J Vasc Surg (à paraître)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Proebstle TM (2010) Controversies and updates in vascular surgery. Is Radiofrequency a lasting procedure? Paris 10–24 janvier

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B et al. (2005) Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): Two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29: 67–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hinchliffe RJ, Ubhi J, Beech A et al. (2006) A prospective randomised controlled trial of VNUS closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31: 12–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kianifard B, Holdstock JM, Whiteley MS (2006) Radiofrequency ablation (VNUS Closure®) does not cause neo-vascularisation at the groin at one year: results of a case controlled study. Surgeon 4: 71–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Perälä J, Rautio T, Biancari F et al. (2005) Radiofrequency endovenous obliteration versus stripping of the long saphenous vein in the management of primary varicose veins: 3-year outcome of a randomized study. Ann Vasc Surg 19: 669–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stötter L, Schaaf I, Bockelbrink A (2006) Comparative outcomes of radiofrequencyendoluminal ablation, invagination stripping, and cryostripping in the treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency. Phlebology 21: 60–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Almeida JI, Kaufman J, Göckeritz O et al. (2009) Radiofrequency endovenous ClosureFast versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, singleblinded, randomized study (Recovery Study). J Vasc Interv Radiol 20: 752–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Proebstle T, Moehler T, Gül D, Herdemann S (2005). Endovenous treatment of GSV using a 1320nm Nd: Yag laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg 31: 1678–83; discussion 1683–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mauriello J, Sanchez EJ, et al. (2009) Radiofrequency Closure-Fast versus Water-Selective Laser Wavelenght at 1470 nm for Saphenous Endovenous Thermal Ablation. 23rd Annual Congress of the American College of Phlebology. Palm Springs, CA November 5–8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pannier E, Rabe E, et al. (2008) Results after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of saphenous veins with a new 1470 nm laser and influence of treatment modifications. 22nd ACP congress, Marco Island, Florida Nov 6–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lawaetz M, Rasmunsen LH, Bjoern L et al. (2010) 11th Annual meeting of the European Venous Forum Antwerp, Belgium, 24–26 juin. Thermo-ablation de la veine grande saphène par le procédé ClosureFast

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lebard, C. (2013). Occlusion de la veine grande saphène par radiofréquence et voie veineuse transcutanée. In: Thérapeutiques endovasculaires des pathologies veineuses. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0291-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0291-6_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0290-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0291-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics