Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Le recours à la tétine chez le nouveau-né et le nourrisson : Quel retentissement ?

  • Conference paper
Book cover 41es Journées nationales de la Société Française de Médecine Périnatale (Grenoble 12–14 octobre 2011)

  • 262 Accesses

Résumé

Différentes études ont indiqué que l’usage de la tétine diminue le risque de mort inattendue du nourrisson (MIN). Par ailleurs, quelques études observationnelles ont suggéré que l’association tétine et allaitement aurait des effets négatifs sur l’allaitement maternel. Cependant, il n’est pas possible de s’appuyer sur des études observationnelles pour déterminer si la tétine est réellement une cause d’interruption de l’allaitement maternel. Une preuve ne peut être apportée que par des études randomisées contrôlées. Trois études de ce type ont été menées sur la relation entre la tétine et l’allaitement; mais elles sont d’amplitude réduite et ont donc leurs limites. Nous avons, dans une importante étude randomisée contrôlée, montré que, pour les mères qui ont pratiqué un allaitement jusqu’à l’âge de deux semaines, la recommandation de la tétine ne modifie en rien la fréquence de l’allaitement maternel, exclusif ou non, ni la durée de celui-ci.

Il apparaît par conséquent important que les spécialistes de l’allaitement et les agences internationales réexaminent leur position inflexible en décourageant tout usage de la tétine. Il apparaît logique qu’une fois que la mère a suffisamment de lait, l’usage de la tétine n’influence en rien la durée de l’allaitement lorsque celle-ci souhaite allaiter plus de trois mois, alors qu’il y a en plus la possibilité de diminuer le risque de MIN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Levin S (1971) Dummies. S Afr Med J 45: 237–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Levin S (1990) A history of dummies. Nurs RSA 5: 17–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kramer MS, Barr RG, Dagenais S, et al. (2001) Pacifier use, early weaning, and cry/fuss behavior: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 286: 322–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aarts C, Hornell A, Kylberg E, et al. (1999) Breastfeeding patterns in relation to thumb sucking and pacifier use. Pediatrics 104: e50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barros FC, Victora CG, Semer TC, et al. (1995) Use of pacifiers is associated with decreased breast-feeding duration. Pediatrics 95: 497–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Howard CR, Howard FM, Lanphear B, et al. (1999) The effects of early pacifier use on breastfeeding duration. Pediatrics 103: E33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Righard L, Alade MO (1997) Breastfeeding and the use of pacifiers. Birth 24: 116–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Victora CG, Tomasi E, Olinto MT, Barros FC (1993) Use of pacifiers and breastfeeding duration. Lancet 34: 404–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Victora CG, Behague DP, Barros FC, et al. (1997) Pacifier use and short breastfeeding duration: cause, consequence, or coincidence? Pediatrics 99: 445–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ford RP, Mitchell EA, Scragg R, et al. (1994) Factors adversely associated with breast feeding in New Zealand. J Paediatr Child Health 30: 483–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vogel AM, Hutchison BL, Mitchell EA (2001) The impact of pacifier use on breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study. J Paediatr Child Health 37: 58–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Uhari M, Mantysaari K, Niemela M (1996) A meta-analytic review of the risk factors for acute otitis media. Clin Infect Dis 22: 1079–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Niemela M, Uhari M, Mottonen M (1995) A pacifier increases the risk of recurrent acute otitis media in children in day care centers. Pediatrics 96: 884–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Niemela M, Pihakari O, Pokka T, Uhari M (2000) Pacifier as a risk factor for acute otitis media: a randomized, controlled trial of parental counseling. Pediatrics 106: 483–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson JM, Mourino AP (1999) Pacifier use and otitis media in infants twelve months of age or younger. Pediatr Dent 21: 255–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Warren JJ, Levy SM, Kirchner HL, et al. (2001) Pacifier use and the occurrence of otitis media in the first year of life. Pediatr Dent 23: 103–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adair SM (2003) Pacifier use in children: a review of recent literature. Pediatr Dent 25: 449–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Canadian Pediatric Society Fetus and Newborn Committee and American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Anesthesiology and Section on Surgery (2005) Prevention and management of pain and stress in the neonate. Paediatr Child Health 5: 31–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A (2003) Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. The Cochrane Library. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carbajal R, Chauvet X, Couderc S, Olivier-Martin M (1999) Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in term neonates. BMJ 319: 1393–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pinelli J, Symington A (1998) Non nutritive sucking in premature infants. The Cochrane Library, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell EA, Taylor BJ, Ford RP, et al. (1993) Dummies and the sudden infant death syndrome. Arch Dis Child 68: 501–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Arnestad M, Andersen M, Rognum TO (1997) Is the use of dummy or carry-cot of importance for sudden infant death? Eur J Pediatr 156: 968–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. L’Hoir MP, Engelberts AC, vanWell GT, et al. (1998) Risk and preventive factors for cot death in The Netherlands, a low-incidence country. Eur J Pediatr 157: 681–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fleming PJ, Blair PS, Pollard K, et al. (1999) Pacifier use and sudden infant death syndrome: results from the CESDI/SUDI case control study. CESDI SUDI Research Team. Arch Dis Child 81: 112–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hauck FR, Herman SM, Donovan M, et al. (2003) Sleep environment and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome in an urban population: the Chicago Infant Mortality Study. Pediatrics 111: 1207–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hepper PG, Shahidullah S, White R (1991) Handedness in the human fetus. Neuropsychology 29: 1107–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss P (2001) Non-nutritive sucking and pacifier use: the clinical relevance. A dissertation submitted to the College of Public Administration in candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Columbus University, August 23

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kelmanson IA (1999) Use of a pacifier and behavioural features in 2-4-month-old infants. Acta Paediatr 88: 1258–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Larsson E (1971) Dummy-and finger-sucking habits with special attention to their significance for facial growth and occlusion. 1. Incidence study. Sven Tandlak Tidskr 64: 667–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zadik D, Stern N, Litner M (1977) Thumb-and pacifier-sucking habits. Am J Orthod 71: 197–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cozzi F, Albani R, Cardi EA (1979) Common pathophysiology for sudden cot death and sleep apnoea. “The vacuum-glossoptosis syndrome”. Med Hypotheses 5: 329–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hauck FR, Omojokun OO, Siadaty MS (2005) Do pacifiers reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome? A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 116: e716–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitchell EA, Blair PS, L’Hoir MP (2006) Should pacifiers be recommended to prevent sudden infant death syndrome? Pediatrics 117:1755–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li DK, Willinger M, Petitti DB, Odouli R, et al. (2006) Use of a dummy (pacifier) during sleep and risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): population based case-control study. BMJ 332: 18–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Franco P, Scaillet S, Wermenbol V, et al. (2000) The influence of a pacifier on infants’ arousals from sleep. J Pediatr 136: 775–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. L’Hoir MP, Engelberts AC, van Well GT, et al. (1999) Dummy use, thumb sucking, mouth breathing and cot death. Eur J Pediatr 158: 896–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McVea KL, Turner PD, Peppler DK (2000) The role of breastfeeding in sudden infant death syndrome. J Hum Lact 16: 13–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, et al. (2007) Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid Rep Technol Assess 153: 1–186

    Google Scholar 

  40. Baby Friendly USA (2005) The ten steps to successful breastfeeding: final report. East Sandwich; MA, Baby Friendly USA

    Google Scholar 

  41. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (2005) The changing concept of sudden infant death syndrome: diagnostic coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping environment, and new variables to consider in reducing risk. Pediatrics 116: 1245–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. LLLI (2005) responds to AAP statement on sudden infant death syndrome. Media releases, October 14

    Google Scholar 

  43. Clements MS, Mitchell EA, Wright SP, et al. (1997) Influences on breastfeeding in southeast England. Acta Paediatr 86: 51–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Howard CR, Howard FM, Lanphear B, et al. (2003) Randomized clinical trial of pacifier use and bottle-feeding or cup feeding and their effect on breastfeeding. Pediatrics 111: 511–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schubiger G, Schwarz U, Tonz O. (1997) UNICEF/WHO baby-friendly hospital initiative: does the use of bottles and pacifiers in the neonatal nursery prevent successful breastfeeding? Neonatal Study Group. Eur J Pediatr 156: 874–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jenik AG, Vain NE, Gorestein AN, Jacobi NE (2009) Does the recommendation to use a pacifier influence the prevalence of breastfeeding? J Pediatr 155: 350–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jaafar SH, Jahanfar S, Angolkar M, Ho JJ (2011) Pacifier use versus no pacifier use in breastfeeding term infants for increasing duration of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD007202. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007202.pub2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. A. G. Jenik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. E. Vain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jenik, A.G., Vain, N.E. (2011). Le recours à la tétine chez le nouveau-né et le nourrisson : Quel retentissement ?. In: 41es Journées nationales de la Société Française de Médecine Périnatale (Grenoble 12–14 octobre 2011). Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0257-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0257-2_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0256-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0257-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation