Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Approche non médicamenteuse de la douleur en salle de naissance : Pratique de la sage-femme

  • Conference paper
41es Journées nationales de la Société Française de Médecine Périnatale (Grenoble 12–14 octobre 2011)

  • 293 Accesses

Résumé

La sage-femme en salle de naissance a souvent recours à des méthodes non médicamenteuses pour aider les parturientes à appréhender les douleurs liées au travail et soutenir les femmes dans leurs projets de naissance. Un nombre très important de méthodes existent mais seules quelques-unes ont été démontrées comme efficaces dans la littérature internationale. Nous nous sommes intéressés à trois techniques dont l’utilisation est associée à un bénéfice dans la gestion des douleurs liées au travail. Nous décrirons ainsi les résultats d’études portant sur: l’accompagnement continu des femmes pendant le travail, l’immersion dans un bain lors de la première phase de travail et le recours à des injections d’eau stérile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Le Ray C, Goffinet F, Palot M, et al. (2008) Factors associated with the choice of delivery without epidural analgesia in women at low risk in France. Birth; 35:171–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Munstedt K, Brenken A, Kalder M (2009) Clinical indications and perceived effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine in departments of obstetrics in Germany: a questionnaire study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146(1): 50–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lowe NK (2002) The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(5 Suppl Nature): S16–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tournaire M, Theau-Yonneau A (2007) Complementary and alternative approaches to pain relief during labor. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 4(4): 409–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong CA (2010) Advances in labor analgesia. Int J Womens Health 1:139–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leeman L, Fontaine P, King V, et al. (2003) The nature and management of labor pain: part I. Nonpharmacologic pain relief. Am Fam Physician 68(6): 1109–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilliland AL (2010) After praise and encouragement: Emotional support strategies used by birth doulas in the USA and Canada. Midwifery 16

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scott KD, Berkowitz G, Klaus M (1999) A comparison of intermittent and continuous support during labor: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(5): 1054–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kennell J, Klaus M, McGrath S, et al. (1991) Continuous emotional support during labor in a US hospital. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 265(17): 2197–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemminki E, Virta AL, Koponen P, et al. (1992) The support person at the delivery—a Finnish study]. Katilolehti 97(1): 4–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM (2010) Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 109(3): 198–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodnett ED (2002) Caregiver support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1): CD000199

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. (2011) Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD003766

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hodnett ED, Lowe NK, Hannah ME, et al. (2002) Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(11): 1373–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cortes E, Basra R, Kelleher CJ (2011) Waterbirth and pelvic floor injury: a retrospective study and postal survey using ICIQ modular long form questionnaires. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 155(1): 27–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cammu H, Clasen K, Van Wettere L, Derde MP (1994) ‘To bathe or not to bathe’ during the first stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73(6): 468–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. da Silva FM, de Oliveira SM, Nobre MR (2009) A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of immersion bath on labour pain. Midwifery 25(3): 286–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Otigbah CM, Dhanjal MK, Harmsworth G, Chard T (2000) A retrospective comparison of water births and conventional vaginal deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 91(1): 15–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eckert K, Turnbull D, MacLennan A (2001) Immersion in water in the first stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 28(2): 84–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rush J, Burlock S, Lambert K, et al. (1996) The effects of whirlpools baths in labor: a randomized, controlled trial. Birth 23(3): 136–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cluett ER, Burns E (2009) Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD000111

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eriksson M, Mattsson LA, Ladfors L (1997) Early or late bath during the first stage of labour: a randomised study of 200 women. Midwifery 13(3): 146–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Simkin PP, O’Hara M (2002) Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(5 Suppl Nature): S131–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Melzack R, Schaffelberg D (1987) Low-back pain during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156(4): 901–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Martensson L, Wallin G (1999) Labour pain treated with cutaneous injections of sterile water: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(7): 633–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Martensson L, Wallin G (2006) Use of acupuncture and sterile water injection for labor pain: a survey in Sweden. Birth 33(4): 289–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trolle B, Moller M, Kronborg H, Thomsen S (1991) The effect of sterile water blocks on low back labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164(5 Pt 1): 1277–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Labrecque M, Nouwen A, Bergeron M, Rancourt JF (1999) A randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic approaches for relief of low back pain during labor. J Fam Pract 48(4): 259–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hutton EK, Kasperink M, Rutten M, et al. (2009) Sterile water injection for labour pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG 116(9): 1158–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Huntley AL, Coon JT, Ernst E (2004) Complementary and alternative medicine for labor pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(1): 36–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fogarty V (2008) Intradermal sterile water injections for the relief of low back pain in labour — a systematic review of the literature. Women Birth 21(4): 157–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lytzen T, Cederberg L, Moller-Nielsen J (1989) Relief of low back pain in labor by using intracutaneous nerve stimulation (INS) with sterile water papules. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 68(4): 341–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Martensson L (2010) The patient observer: sterile water injections for labor pain. Birth 37(4): 334–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Martensson L, Wallin G (2008) Sterile water injections as treatment for low-back pain during labour: a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48(4): 369–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ader L, Hansson B, Wallin G (1990) Parturition pain treated by intracutaneous injections of sterile water. Pain 41(2): 133–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bahasadri S, Ahmadi-Abhari S, Dehghani-Nik M, Habibi GR (2006) Subcutaneous sterile water injection for labour pain: a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46(2): 102–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kushtagi P, Bhanu BT (2009) Effectiveness of subcutaneous injection of sterile water to the lower back for pain relief in labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(2): 231–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Martensson L, Nyberg K, Wallin G (2000) Subcutaneous versus intracutaneous injections of sterile water for labour analgesia: a comparison of perceived pain during administration. BJOG 107(10): 1248–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. A. Chantry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chantry, A. (2011). Approche non médicamenteuse de la douleur en salle de naissance : Pratique de la sage-femme. In: 41es Journées nationales de la Société Française de Médecine Périnatale (Grenoble 12–14 octobre 2011). Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0257-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0257-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0256-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0257-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation