Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic et décisions dans le cancer du sein précoce Facteurs de décision en radiologie

  • Chapter
Diagnostic et décision dans le cancer du sein à un stade précoce

Part of the book series: Collection Oncologie Pratique ((ONCOLPRAT))

  • 314 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Georgen SK, Evans J, Cohen GPB, MacMillan GH (1997) Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology 204: 131–5

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hofvind S, Geller B, Skaane P (2008) Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers. Acta Radiol 40 (9): 975–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taourel P, Merigeaud S, Aubert E et al (2009) Tomosynthèse: luxe ou nécessité? J Radiol 90: 1813–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al (2010) Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results. Radiology 256 1: 297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sardanelli S, Boetes C, Borisch B and al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the Breast:Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur Radiol 46: 1296–316

    Google Scholar 

  6. BI-RADS Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (2004) Atlas d’imagerie du sein, ACR Bi-Rads. Deuxième édition française basée sur la 4e édition américaine. SFR Ed

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomassin-Naggara I, Salem C, Darai E et al (2009) Le rehaussement sans masse en IRM mammaire: comment j’interprète? J Radiol 90: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tabar L, Dean P (2001) Teaching Atlas of mammography. Thieme Ed, Stuttgart-New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schrading S, Kuhl C (2008) Mammographic, US, and MRI Imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer. Radiology 246: 58–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mesurolle B, Kadoch L, El-Khoury M et al (2007) Sonographic features of breast carcinoma presenting as masses in BRCA gene mutation carriers. J Ultrasound Med 26: 817–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilbert F, Warren RM, Kwan-Lim G et al (2009) Cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and in women at high risk for breast cancer: MR Imaging and mammographic features. Radiology 252: 358–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallis M, Tardivon A, Helbich T, Schreer I (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17: 581–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L (2008) US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of validation study in 1 352 cases. Radiology 248 (2): 406–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK (2008) Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2 420 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Roentgenol 190 (1): 202–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liberman L (2002) Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 40 (3): 483–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lomoschitz FM, Helbich TH, Rudas M et al (2004) Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 232: 897–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagnall MJ, Evans AJ, Wilson AR et al (2000) When have mammography calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy? Clin Radiol 55: 548–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Penco S, Rizzo S, Bozzini AC et al (2010) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is not a therapeutic procedure even when all mammographically found calcifications are removed: analysis of 4,086 procedures. Am J Roentgenol 195 (5): 1255–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaveron C, Bachelle F, Fauquet I et al (2009) Déplacements de clip postmacrobiopsie sous guidage stéréotaxique et repérage préopératoire: trucs et astuces. J Radiol 90: 31–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY et al (2008) Nonmalignant papillary lesions of the breast at USguide directional vacuum-assisted removal: a preliminary report. Eur Radiol Sep 18 (9): 1774–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cassano E, Urban LA, Pizzamiglio M et al (2007) Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases breast cancer. Res Treat 102 (1): 103–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li JL, Wang ZL, Su L, Liu XJ, Tang J (2010) Breast lesions with ultrasound imaging-histologic discordance at 16-gauge core needle biopsy: can re-biopsy with 10-gauge vacuum-assisted system get definitive diagnosis? Breast; 19 (6): 446–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sebag P, Tourasse C, Rouyer N et al (2006) Place des macrobiopsies assistées par le vide sous guidage échographique: étude multi-centrique de 650 lésions. J Radiol 87 (1): 29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sinnatamby R, Lebeau A et al (2009) Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): Results of a European consensus meeting. Eur J Radiol 72 (2): 289–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trop I, Labelle M, David J et al (2010) Second-look targeted studies aft er breast magnetic resonance imaging: practical tips to improve lesion identification. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 39 (5): 200–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA (2009) Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. Am J Roentgenol 193 (4): 1025–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Balu-Maestro C, Ettore F, Chapellier C (2006) Quand se méfier des résultats des micro-et macrobiopsies guides mammaires? J Radiol 87 (3): 265–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Darling MLR, Smith DN, Lester SC et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large core needle breast biopsy: Results of surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol 175: 1341–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jackman R, Burbank F, Parker SH et al (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218: 497–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Perlet C, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A (2006) Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuumassisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 106: 982–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liberman L, Drotmen M, Morris EA et al (2000) Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. An indicator of missed cancer. Cancer 89 (12): 2538–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Boisserie-Lacroix M (2006) Le dispositif d’annonce du cancer du sein: quelle place pour la radiologue? J Radiol 87: 105–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. unité de Sénologie, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l’Argonne, 33076, Bordeaux cedex, France

    Martine Boisserie-Lacroix, Maryam Asad-Syed, Gabrielle Hurtevent-Labrot & Stéphane Ferron

Authors
  1. Martine Boisserie-Lacroix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maryam Asad-Syed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gabrielle Hurtevent-Labrot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stéphane Ferron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boisserie-Lacroix, M., Asad-Syed, M., Hurtevent-Labrot, G., Ferron, S. (2012). Diagnostic et décisions dans le cancer du sein précoce Facteurs de décision en radiologie. In: Diagnostic et décision dans le cancer du sein à un stade précoce. Collection Oncologie Pratique. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0253-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0253-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0252-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0253-4

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation