Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Cancer du sein : surdiagnostic, surtraitement pp 44–52Cite as

Dépistage et surdiagnostic : sommes-nous victimes du progrès technologique?

Screening and overdiagnosis: are we becoming victims of our own success?

  • Conference paper

  • 251 Accesses

Résumé

Dans une société où le progrès, « pas collectif du genre humain » selon Victor Hugo, est ressenti comme la première cause du bien-être de ses membres, poser en 2011 cette question peut paraître incongru. Comment une patiente atteinte d’un cancer du sein pourrait-elle être victime de ce que nous mettons en oeuvre pour lui apporter les meilleures chances de guérison avec un souci d’efficacité maximale?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Kalager M, Zelen M, Langmark F et al. (2010) Effect of screening mammography on Breast cancer mortality in Norway. NEJM 363: 1203–1210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pisano E, Gatsonis C, Hendricks E et al. (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast cancer screening. NEJM 353: 1773–1783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O et al. (1994) Non palpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast enhanced substraction dynamic MR Imaging. Radiology 191: 625–631

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46: 1296–1313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen O, Gøtzsche PC (2001) Screening for breast cancer with mammography Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: CD001877

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hambly N, McNicholas M, Phelan N et al. (2009) Comparison of digital mammography and screen film mammography in Breast cancer screening: A review in the Irish breast screening program. AJR 193: 1010–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall FM (2010) Identification, biopsy and treatment of poorly understood premalignant In situ and indolent low grade cancer: Are we becoming victims of our own success? Radiology 254: 655–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Welch G, Black W (2010) Overdiagnosis in cancer. JNCI 102: 605–613

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nothaker M, Duda V, Hahn M et al. (2009) Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review. BMC Cancer 9: 335–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département d’imagerie, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59020, Lille

    L. Ceugnart & S. Taieb

  2. Département de sénologie, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59020, Lille

    P. Vennin

Authors
  1. L. Ceugnart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Taieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Vennin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ceugnart, L., Taieb, S., Vennin, P. (2012). Dépistage et surdiagnostic : sommes-nous victimes du progrès technologique?. In: Cancer du sein : surdiagnostic, surtraitement. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0249-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0249-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0248-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0249-7

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation