Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Progrès en sécurité des soins ((Progrès en sécurité des soins))

  • 217 Accesses

Résumé

Le leader crée les conditions qui rendront l’amélioration de la valeur possible. La littérature est unanime sur son rôle déterminant pour le succès de tout projet. Mais alors, que devons-nous faire lorsque nous sommes rattachés à un leader qui ne soutient pas cette amélioration ? Chaque cadre peut, sur le long terme, influencer les dirigeants des niveaux supérieurs afin que ceux-ci créent des conditions propices à l’amélioration. Il peut aussi assumer son rôle à l’égard de sa base en analysant les données, en communiquant la direction, en motivant, en évaluant et en soutenant la pérennisation des améliorations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Øvretveit J (2009) Leading improvement effectively, a review of research. The Health Foundation, London. http://www.health.org.uk/publications/research_reports/index.html or http://homepage.mac.com/johnovr/FileSharing2.html

    Google Scholar 

  2. Øvretveit J, Staines A (2007) Sustained improvement? Findings from an independent case study of the Jonkoping quality programme Quality Management in Health Care 16: 68–83

    Google Scholar 

  3. Staines A (2008) Successful Hospital and System Quality Progams: How Did They Do it, and Is There Evidence of Improvement? In: Øvretveit J, Sousa P, eds. Quality and safety improvement research: methods and research practice from the International Quality Improvement Research. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Lisbon, Vol. 8, p 209–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walshe K (2009) Pseudoinnovation: the development and spread of healthcare quality improvement methodologies. Int J Qual Health Care 21: 153–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berwick DM (1996) A primer on leading the improvement of systems. Br Med J 312: 619–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crump B (2008) How can we make improvement happen? Clinical Governance: An International Journal 13: 43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Solberg LI (2007) Improving medical practice: a conceptual framework. Ann Fam Med 2007 5: 51–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. IHI (2002) Pursuing perfection: program update October 2002. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Boston. www.ihi.org/pursuing perfection/

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nolan T, Bisognano M (2006) Finding the balance between quality and cost. Healthcare Financial Management 60: 66–72

    Google Scholar 

  10. Botwinick L, Bisognano M, Haraden C (2006) Leadership Guide to Patient Safety Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA. www.IHI.org

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reinertsen J, Pugh M, Bisognano M (2008) Seven Leadership Leverage Points (updated from 2005). Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA. www.IHI.org

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conway J, McCannon J, Gunther-Murphy C (2008) The new challenge in patient safety: Transforming leadership infrastructure through widespread board engagement. Healthcare Executive 23: 62–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Conway J B (2000) Strategies for Leadership: Hospital Executives and Their Role in Patient Safety. American Hospital Association, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reinertsen JL, Gosfield AG, Rupp W, Whittington JW (2007) Engaging Physicians in a Shared Quality Agenda. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA. www.IHI.org

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reiter KL, Kilpatrick KE, Greene SB (2006) How to develop a business case for quality. Intern J Quality Health Care 19: 50–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leatherman S, Berwick D, Iles D et al. (2003) The Business Case For Quality: Case Studies And An Analysis. Health Aff 22: 17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gross P, Haraden C, Hatlic MJ et al. (2007) The Business Case for Quality at a University Teaching Hospital. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Safety 33: 163–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gosfield A Reinertsen J (2003) Doing Well By Doing Good: Improving the Business Case for Quality. The Reinertsen Group Alta, Wyoming

    Google Scholar 

  19. Øvretveit J (2004) Costing quality and safety deficiencies in healthcare — A review of research, for Stockholm County Council. Karolinska Institutet, Medical Management Centre, Stockolm, April 17. http://homepage.mac.com/johnovr/FileSharing2.htm

    Google Scholar 

  20. Levey S, Vaughn T, Koepke M et al. (2007) Hospital Leadership and Quality Improvement: Rhetoric Versus Reality. J Patient Safety 3: 9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. NIST (2000) Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence. Baldrige National Quality Programme, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available online at: www.quality.nist.gov

    Google Scholar 

  22. JCAHO (2008) Facts about Joint Commission Accreditation Standards. OakBrook, IL. Available online at www.jointcommission.org/Standards/

    Google Scholar 

  23. Department of Health (DoH) (2009) Inspiring Leaders: Leadership for Quality, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Øvretveit, J., Staines, A. (2011). Rôle du leader. In: L’amélioration de la valeur dans les services de santé. Progrès en sécurité des soins. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0229-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0229-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0228-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0229-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics