Skip to main content

Objectifs thérapeutiques

  • Chapter
Sepsis grave et choc septique

Part of the book series: Le point sur … ((POINT))

  • 675 Accesses

Résumé

La réanimation initiale du choc septique implique de remplir un certain nombre d’objectifs thérapeutiques dans un délai court qui va de soixante minutes pour les mesures de sauvegarde initiale jusqu’à six heures maximum pour les mesures complémentaires. Les objectifs thérapeutiques ont fait l’objet d’une analyse exhaustive et argumentée dans un texte de 2008 publié sous l’égide d’un groupe d’experts coordonné par R.-P. Dellinger (Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 36, pp 296–327). (Le système GRADE a été utilisé pour préciser la force des recommandations faites par les experts [GRADE working group BMJ 2004, 328, pp 1490–1498]. Ceux-ci (55 experts internationaux) ont utilisé la méthode Delphi pour l’établissement des recommandations avec des réunions physiques, des téléconférences et des discussions par courriers électroniques. Les recommandations de niveau 1A doivent impérativement être suivies, les recommandations de niveau 2D font l’objet de débat et leur pertinence n’est pas établie).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Réfénces

  1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al. (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345: 1368–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bendjelid K, Romand JA (2003) Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 29: 352–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Magder S (2006) Central venous pressure: A useful but not so simple measurement. Crit Care Med 34: 2224–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vincent JL, Weil MH (2006) Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med 34: 1333–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE et al. (2006) Duration of hypotension prior to initiation of Effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 34: 1589–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jimenez MF, Marshall JC (2001) Source control in the management of sepsis. Intensive Care Med 27: S49–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi PTL, Yip G, Quinonez LG et al. (1999) Crystalloids vs. colloids in fluid resuscitation: A systematic review. Crit Care Med 27: 200–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hollenberg SM, Ahrens TS, Annane D et al. (2004) Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: update. Crit Care Med 32: 1928–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin C, Papazian L, Perrin G et al. (1993) Norepinephrine or dopamine for the treatment of hyperdynamic septic shock? Chest 103: 1826–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Backer D, Creteur J, Silva E et al. (2003) Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in septic shock: Which is best? Crit Care Med 31: 1659–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bollaert PE, Bauer P, Audibert G et al. (1990) Effects of epinephrine on hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism in dopamine-resistant septic shock. Chest 98: 949–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moran JL, O’Fathartaigh MS, Peisach AR et al. (1993) Epinephrine as an inotropic agent in septic shock: A dose-profile analysis. Crit Care Med 21: 70–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Djillali A, Vigno P, Renault A et al. (2007) For the CATS STUDY Group: Norepinephrine alone for management of septic shock: a randomized trial. Lancet 370: 676–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien A, Calpp L, Singer M (2002) Terlipressin for norepinephrine-resistant septic shock. Lancet 359: 1209–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C et al. (2002) Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA 288: 862–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE et al. (2009) Corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. JAMA 301: 2362–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marik PE, Sibbald WJ (1993) Effect of stored-blood transfusion on oxygen delivery in patients with sepsis. JAMA 269: 3024–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lorente JA, Landin L, de Pablo R et al. (1993) Effects of blood transfusion on oxygen transport variables in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 21: 1312–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (1996) Task Force on Blood Component Therapy: Practice guidelines for blood component therapy. Anesthesiology 84: 732–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michel, F., Leone, M., Martin, C. (2011). Objectifs thérapeutiques. In: Sepsis grave et choc septique. Le point sur …. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0064-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0064-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0063-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0064-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics