Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Insémination intra-utérine avec sperme du conjoint

  • Chapter
Book cover Physiologie, pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez l’humain

  • 894 Accesses

Résumé

Les premières inséminations mentionnées dans la littérature semblent remonter au Xe siècle où des tribus arabes utilisaient l’insémination pour féconder leurs juments, en multipliant ainsi les possibilités de procréation d’un même étalon. Paracelse semble au début du XVIe siècle avoir tenté, sans succès, des expériences d’insémination artificielle dans l’espèce humaine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Ombelet W. Puttemans P. Bosmans E (1995) Intrauterine insemination: a first step procedure in the algorythm of male subfertility treatment. Hum Reprod 10(supp l1):90–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crosignani PG. Walters DE. Soliani (1991) A The ESHRE multicentre trial on the treatment of unexplained infertility: a preliminary report Hum Reprod 6:953–958

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes EG (1997) The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 12:1865–1872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Donovan PA. Vandekerckhove P. Lilford RJ et al. (1993) Treatment of male infertility: is it effective? Review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod 8:1209–1222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wainer R. Merlet F (1998) Indications des inséminations intra-utérines intraconjugales en cas d’oligo-asthénospermie. Les traitements actuels de la stérilité masculine. Paris, John Libbey:103–121

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nan PM. Cohlen BJ. Te Velde ER et al. (1994) Intrauterine insemination or timed intercourse after ovarian stimulation for male subfertility. Hum Reprod 9:2022–2026

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaffkin LM. Nulsen JC. Luciano AA. Metzger DA (1991) A comparative analysis of the cycle fecondity rate associated with combined human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus HMG or IUI alone. Fertil Steril 55:252–257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karlström PO. Bergh T. Lundkvist O (1993) A prospective randomized trial of artificial insemination versus intercourse in cycle stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin or clomiphene citrate. Fetil Steril 59:554–559

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nulsen JC. Walsh S. Dumez S. Metzger D (1993) A randomized and longitudinal study of human menopausal gonadotropin with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Obstet Gynecol 82:780–786

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Requena A. Herrero J. Landeras J et al. (2008) Use of letrozole in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 14:571–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fanchin R. Righini C. Giatras C et al. (1994) Induction de l’ovulation en 1994: l’intérêt des inséminations intrautérines. Ref Gynecol Obstet 2:171–178

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gagliardi CL. Emmi AM. Weiss G. Schmidt CL (1991) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist improve the efficiency of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 55:939–944

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lambalk CB. Leader A. Olivennes F et al. (2006) Treatment with the Gnrh antagonist ganirelix prevents premature LH rises and luteinisation in stimulated intrauterine insemination: results of a double-blind, placebo-controled, multicentre trial. Hum Reprod 21:623–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ertunc D. Tok EC. Savas A et al. (2010) Gondotropin-releasing hormone antagonist use in controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 93:1179–1184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ragni G. Somigliana E. Vegetti W (2004) Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we? Fertil Steril 82:25–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ransom MX. Blotner MB. Bohrer M et al. (1994) Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rate significantly during superovulation cycles? Fertil Steril 61:357–361

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zeyneloglu HB (2004) Single versus double intrauterine insemination: are outcomes affected? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 16:251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Polyzos NP. Tzorias S. Mauri D. Tatsioni A (2010) Double versus single intrauterine insemination for unexplained infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Fertil Steril (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dodson WC. Moessner J. Miller J et al. (1998) A randomized comparison of the méthods of sperm preparation for intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 70:574–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. David G. Bisson JP. Czyglik F et al. (1975) Anomalies morphologiques du spermatozoïde humain.1. Proposition pour un système de classification. J. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 4:17–36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jouannet P. Ducot B. Feneux D. Spira A (1988) Male factors and the likehood of pregnancy in infertile couples.1. Study and sperm characteristics. Int J Androl 11:379–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saleh A. Tan SL. Biljan MM. Tulandi T (2000) A randomized study of the effect of 10 minutes of bed rest after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 74:509–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Erdem A. Erdem M. Atmaca S. Guler I (2009) Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intra uterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 91:2508–2513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Costello MF. Emerson S. Lukic J et al. (2004) Predictive value of mid luteal progesterone concentration before luteal support in controlled-ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 44:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kahn JA. Von During V. Sunde A et al. (1992) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion: first clinical experience. Hum Reprod 7(suppl 1):19–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gregoriou O. Pyrgiotis E. Konidaris S et al. (1995) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion has no advantage over intrauterine insemination when used in combination with ovarian stimulation for the treatment of unexplained infertility. Gynecol Obstet Invest 39:226–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Karande VC. Rao R. Pratt DE et al. (1995) A randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and fallopian sperm perfusion for the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 65:638–640

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nuoja-Huttunen S. Tuomivaara L. Juntunen K et al. (1997) Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 67:939–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cantineau AE. Cohlen BJ. Heineman MJ (2009) Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15:CD001502

    Google Scholar 

  30. Comhaire F. Milingos S. Liapi A et al. (1994) The effective cumulative pregnancy rate of different modes of treatment of male infertility. Andrologia 27:217–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wainer R. Merlet F.. Bailly M et al. (1996) Facteurs pronostiques des inséminations intra-uterines avec sperme du conjoint. Contracept Fertil Sex 24:897–903

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lelannou D (1994) L’insémination intra-utérine, indications et résultats. Contracept Fertil Sex 22:361–369

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Merviel P. Heraud MH. Grenier N et al. (2010) Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 93:79–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Plosker S. Amato P (1994) Predicting and optimizing success in an intrauterine insemination stimulation program. Hum Reprod 9:2014–2021

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nuoja-Huttunen S. Tomas C. Bloigu R et al. (1999) Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod 14:698–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Aboulghar M. Mansour R. Serour G et al. (2001) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of unexplained infertility should be limited to a maximum of three trials. Fertil Steril 75:88–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zadehmodarres S. Oladi B. Saeedi S et al. (2009) Intrauterine insemination with husband semen: an evaluation of pregnancy rate and factors affecting outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 26:7–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Custers IM. Steures P. Hompes P et al. (2008) Intrauterine insemination: how many cycles should be perform? Hum Reprod 23:885–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wainer R. Albert M. Dorion A et al. (2004) Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 19:2060–2065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang JH. WU MY. Chao KH et al. (1998) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination in subfertility. How many treatment cycles are sufficient? J Reprod Med 43:903–908

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Farhi J. Valentine A. Bahadur G et al. (1995) In vitro cervical mucus-sperm penetration tests and outcome of infertility treatments in couples with repeatedly negative post-coital tests. Hum Reprod 10:85–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tomlinson MJ. Amissah-Arthur JB et al. (1996) Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): Statistical model for success. Hum Reprod 11:1892–1896

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Steures P. van der Steeg JW. Verhoeve HR et al. (2004) Does ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination for cervical factor subfertility improve pregnancy rate? Hum Reprod 19:2263–2266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Steures P. van der Steeg JW. Hompes PGA et al. (2007) (Collaborative effort for clinical evaluation in Reproductive Medicine) Effectiveness of intrauterine insemination in subfertile couples with an isolated cervical factor: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 88:1692–1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Helmerhorst FM. Van Vliet HA. Gornas T et al. (2005) Intrauterine insemination versus timed intercourse for cervical hostility in subfertile couples. Cochrane Database Rev 19:CD002809

    Google Scholar 

  46. Helmerhorst FM. Van Vliet HA. Gornas T et al. (2006) Intrauterine insemination versus timed intercourse for cervical hostility in subfertile couples. Obstet Gynecol Surv 61:402–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gallot-Lavallée P. Ecochard R. Mathieu C et al. (1995) Clomiphène citrate or HMG: which ovarian stimulation to chose before intrauterine insemination? A meta-analysis. Contracept Fertil Sex 23:115–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Steures P. van der Steeg JW. Hompes PGA et al. (2007) The additional value of ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination for couples with an abnormal postcoital test and a poor prognosis: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 88:1618–1624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cohlen BJ. Vandekerckhove P. te Velde ER. Habbema JD (2000) Timed intercourse versus intrauterine insemination with or without hyperstimulation for subfertility in men. Cochrane database Syst Rev:CD000360

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bensdorp AJ. Cohlen BJ. Heineman MJ. Vandekerkhove P (2007) Intrauterine insemination for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD000360

    Google Scholar 

  51. Guzick DS. Sullivan MW. Adamson GD et al. (1998) Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 70:207–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Zeynologlu HB. Arici A. Olive DL. Duleba AJ (1998) Comparison of intrauterine insemination with timed intercourse in superovulated cycles with gonadotropins: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 69:486–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Steures P. van der Steeg JW. Hompes PG et al. (2006) Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus expectant management for couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 368:216–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Snick HK. Collins JA. Evers JL (2008) Whath is the most valid comparison treatment in trials of intrauterine insemination, timed or uninfluenced intercourse? A systematic review and meta-analysis of indirect evidence. Hum Reprod 23:2239–2245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Erdem A. Erdem M. Atmaca S et al. (2008) Factors affecting birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles with recombinant gonadotrophin stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 17:199–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Dovey S. Sneeringer RM. Penzias AS (2008) Clomiphene citrate and intrauterine insemination: analysis of more than 4,100 cycles. Fertil Steril 90:2281–2286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bronte A. Stone PD. Ringler AL. Stein AL. Marrs RP (1999) Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: analysis of outcome of 9963 consecutive cycles. Obstet Gynecol 180:1522–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Goverde A. McDonnell. Vermeiden R at al. (2000) Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilization in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost effectiveness analysis. Lancet 355:13–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Harris ID. Missmer SA. Hornstein MD (2010) Poor success of gonadotropin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for older women. Fertil Steril (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mullin CM. Virji N. Saketos M. San Roman G (2005) Day 2 Follicles stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2): could these values be used as markers to predict pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing ovulation induction (OI) therapy with intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles? Fertil Steril 84:S162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cantineau AE. Cohlen BJ. Heineman MJ (2007) Ovarian stimulation protocols (anti-oestrogens, gonadotrophins with and without GnRH agonist/antagonists) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD005356

    Google Scholar 

  62. Van Rumste MM. Custers IM. van der Veen F et al. (2008) The influence of the number of follicles on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 14:563–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Guven S. Gunalp GS. Tekin Y (2008) Factors influencing pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles. J Reprod Med 53:257–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Belaisch-Allart J. Mayenga JM. Plachot M (1999) Intrauterine insemination. Contracept Fertil Sexn 27:616–621

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jakus S. Spandorfer S. Rosenwaks Z (2005) Natural cycle and timing of intrauterine insemination: HCG versus spontaneous LH surge. Fertil Steril 84:366–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Miller DC. Hollenbeck BK. Smith GD et al. (2002) Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Urology 60:497–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Khalil MR. Rasmussen PE. Erb K et al. (2001) Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2,473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:74–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Van Voorhis BJ. Barnett M. Sparks AE et al. (2001) Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 75:661–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Badawy A. Elnashar A. Eltotongy M (2009) Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 91:777–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Huang HY. Lai YM (1996) The impact of the total motile sperm count on the success of intrauterine insemination with husband’s spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet 13:56–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Sakhel K. Schwarck S. Ashraf M. Abuzeid M (2005) Semen parameters as determinants of success in 1,662 cycles of intrauterine insemination after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 84:248–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Dickey RP. Lu PY. Taylor SN. Rye PH (1999) Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril 71:684–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Horvath PM. Shelden RM. Kemmen E (1989) The relationship of sperm parameters to cycle fecundity in superovulated women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 52:288–294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Haim D. Leniaud L. Porcher R et al. (2009) Évaluation prospective de l’impact des paramètres spermatiques sur le succès des inséminations intra-utérines. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 37:229–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Ombelet W. Deblaere K. Bosmans E et al. (2003) Semen quality and intrauterine insemination. Reprod Biomed Online 7:485–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Van Weert JM. Repping S. Van Voorhis et al. (2004) Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 82:612–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Yalti S. Gurbuz B. Sezer H. Celik S (2004) Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Arch Androl 50:239–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Burr R. Siegberg C. Matthews C. Flaherty S (1996) The influence of sperm morphology and the number of motile sperm inseminated on the outcome of intrauterine insemination combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 65:127–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Hauser R. Yogev L. Botchan A et al. (2001) Intrauterine insemination in male factor subfertility: significance of sperm motility and morphology assessed by strict criteria. Andrologia 33:13–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Comhaire FH (1987) Simple model and empirical method for the estimation of spontaneous pregnancies in couples consulting for infertility. Int J Androl 10:671–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Eimers JM. te Velde ER. Gerritse R et al. (1994) The prediction of the chance to conceive in subfertile couples. Fertil Steril 61:44–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Collins JA. Burrows EA. Willan AR (1995) The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil Steril 64:22–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Snick HK. Snick TS. Evers JL. Collins JA (1997) The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study. Hum Reprod 12:1582–1588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Farhi J. Ben-Haroush A. Lande Y. Fish B (2007) Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography. Fertil Steril 88:396–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Sacks PC. Simon JA (1991) Infectious complications of intrauterine insemination: a case report and literature review. Int J Fertil 36:331–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Kolb BA. Mercer L. Peters AJ. Kazer R (1994) Ovarian abscess following therapeutic insemination. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1:249–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Yovich JL. Matson PL (1988) The treatment of infertility by the high intrauterine insemination of husband’s washed spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 3:939–943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Dodson WC. Haney AF (1991) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 55:457–467

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Dickey RP. Olar TT. Taylor SN et al. (1991) serum estradiol and other factors to birth rate and multiparity in human menopausal gonadotropin induced intruterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 56:89–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Shelden R. Kemmann E. Bohrer M. Pasquale S (1988) Multiple gestation is associated with the use of high sperm numbers in the intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 49:607–610

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Tur R. Barri PN. Coroleu B et al. (2001) Risk factors for high-order multiple implantation after ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins: evidence from a large series of 1,878 consecutive pregnancies in a single centre. Hum Reprod 16:2124–2129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Yudin MH. Asztalos EV. Jefferies A et al. (2001) The management and outcome of high order multifetal pregnancies: obstetric, neonatal and follow up data. Twin Res 4:4–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2000) Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod 15:1856–1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Massin N. Cedrin-Durnerin I. Hugues JN (2004) Intrauterine insemination:a spontaneous or medically-assisted ovulation? Gynecol Obstet 32:898–903

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Dicket RP (2009) Strategies to reduce multiple pregnancies due to ovulation stimulation. Fertil Steril 91:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Comhaire F (1995) Economic strategies in modern male subfertility treatment. Hum Reprod (supp l1):103–106

    Google Scholar 

  97. Van Voorhis BJ. Sparks AET. Allen BD et al. (1997) Cost-effectiveness of infertility treatments: a cohort study. Fertl Steril 67:830–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Van Voorhis BJ. Stovall DW. Allen BD. Syrop CH (1998) Cost-effective treatment of the infertile couple. Fertil Steril 70:995–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Van Weert JM. van den Broek J. van der Steeg JW et al. (2007) Patients’preference for intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biomed Online 15:422–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Pashayan N. Lyratzopoulos G. Mathur R (2006) Cost effectiveness of primary offer of IVF versus primary offer of IUI followed by IVF (for IUI failures) in couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility. BMC Health Serv Res 23:80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Royère D (2004) Intrauterine insemination: state-of-the-art in humans. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 32:873–879

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de médecine de la reproduction, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines CHI Poissy-Saint-Germain, 10, rue du Champ Gaillard, 78303, Poissy Cedex

    R. Wainer

Authors
  1. R. Wainer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wainer, R. (2011). Insémination intra-utérine avec sperme du conjoint. In: Physiologie, pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez l’humain. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0060-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0061-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation