Résumé
L’utilisation de la stimulation ovarienne a pour objectif d’augmenter les taux de succès de la fécondation in vitro en permettant le développement de nombreux follicules, favorisant ainsi l’obtention d’un nombre conséquent d’ovocytes et d’embryons. Elle est également utilisée seule ou en association avec des inséminations intra-utérines. Dans ce cas, le but est d’induire une ovulation. Dans le cadre des inséminations ou des stimulations simples, c’est-à-dire sans insémination, la stimulation se veut douce pour faire émerger entre un à trois follicules au plus et ainsi éviter au mieux les grossesses multiples.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
Eibschitz I, Belaisch-Allart J, Frydman R (1986) In vitro fertilization management and results in stimulated cycles with spontaneous LH discharge. Fertil Steril 45:231–234
Rizk B, Smitz J (1992) Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after superovulation using LH-RH agonists for IVF and related procedures. Hum Reprod 7:320–327
Albano C, Smitz J, Camus M et al. (1997) Comparison of different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 67:917–922
Olivennes F, Fanchin R, Bouchard P et al. (1995) Schedulded administration of GNRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) on day 8 of in vitro fertilization cycles: a pilot study. Hum Reprod 10:1382–1386
Kousta E, White Dm, Franks S (1997) Modern use of clomiphene citrate in induction of ovulation. Human Reprod Update 4:358–365
Coomarasamy A, Afnan M, Cheema D et al. (2008) Urinary hMG versus recombinant FSH for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation following an agonist long down-regulation protocol in IVF or ICSI treatment:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction 23:310–315
Bosch E, Vidal C, Labarta E, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A (2008) Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists-a randomized study. Human Reproduction 23:2346–2351
Rongières C (2006) Monitoring ovarian stimulation: are hormonal assessments necessary? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 35:2S39–2S41
Kwan I, Bhattacharya S, Mcneil A, Van Rumste MME (2008) Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI) (Review) Cochrane Data Base 2:CD005289
Hugues JN, Barlow DH, Rosenwaks Z et al. (2003) Improvment in consistency of response to ovarian stimulation with recombinent human follicule hormone resulting from a new method for calibrating the therapeutic preparation. Reprod Biomed Online 6:185–190
Kosmas P, Tatsioni A, Kolibianakis EM et al. (2008) Effects and clinical significance of GnRH antagonist administration for IUI timing in FSH superovulated cycles: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 90:367–372
Isikoglu M, Ozdem S, Berkkanoglu M, Jammal H, Senturk Z, Ozgur K (2007) Single-dose depot leuprolide is as efficient as daily short acting leuprolide in ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 22:1657–1661
Hugues JN (2002) Contribution of exogenous LH during ovarian stimulation: for a targeted indication Gynecol Obstet Fertil 30:79–83.
Surrey ES, Schoolcraft WB (2000) Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril 73:667–676
Ludwig M, Katalinic A, Banz C, Schröder Ak, Löning M, Weiss JM (2002) Tailoring the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix acetate to individual patients’ needs in ovarian stimulation for IVF: results of a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 17:2842–2845
Ludwig M, Katalinic A, Diedrich K (2001) Use of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technologies compared to thelong protocol Meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 265:175–182
Rongières-Bertrand C, Olivennes F, Righini C et al. (1999) Revival of the natural cycles in in vitro fertilization with the use of a new GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix): a pilot study with minimal stimulation. Human Reprod 14:683–688
Kolibianakis em (2005) GnRH antagonists in IVF. RBM Online 10:705–712
Abdalla HI, Ah-Moye M, Brinsden P, Howe Dl, Okonofua F, Craft I (1987) The effect of the dose of hCG and the type of gonadotropin stimulation on ovocyte recovery rate in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 48:958–963
Emperaire JC, Parneix I, Broussin B, Ruffie A (1998) Triggering ovulation with different doses of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in stimulated cycles. Fertil Steril 70(Suppl. 1)
De Ziegler D, Bulletti C, De Monstier B, Jääskeläinen AS (1997) The first uterine pass effect. Ann NY Acad Sci 828:291–299
Aboulghar M (2009) Luteal support in reproduction: when, what and how? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21:279–284
Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Diedrich K, Tarlatzis BC, Griesinger G (2008) Estrogen addition to progesterone for luteal phase support in cycles stimulated with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 23:1346–1354
Poustie J, Dodd S, Drakeley AJ (2007) Low-dose aspirin for in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:CD004832
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rongières, C., Moreau, L., Lamarca, E., Weber, P. (2011). Stimulation ovarienne, déclenchement de l’ovulation et soutien de la phase lutéale. In: Physiologie, pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez l’humain. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0060-8
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0061-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)