Skip to main content
  • 893 Accesses

Résumé

La première tentative de cathétérisme des trompes utérines par voie transcervicale fut reportée dans un travail réalisé en 1849. L’auteur utilisait alors une canule en argent en forme de J pour accéder aux ostia utérotubaires puis, ainsi guidé, il glissait un fanon de baleine dans la lumière tubaire. Au travers de cet article, quatre concepts modernes furent abordés. Premièrement, l’idée que du «sable» puisse obstruer la lumière tubaire et, ainsi, rendre stérile des femmes. Deuxièmement, un objet mécanique pouvait enlever cet obstacle et rétablir la fertilité. Troisièmement, un système co-axial pouvait être utilisé pour cathététiser la lumière tubaire et, enfin, l’accession è la lumière tubaire pouvait se faire par impression tactile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Cornier E (1985) Per-celioscopic ampullosalpingoscopy. Paris, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 14:459–466

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Surrey ES (1999) Microendoscopy of the human fallopian tube. J Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6:383–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kerin JF (1996) Falloposcopy: antegrade imaging in the management of oviductal disease. J Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3(Suppl) 21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dechaud H, Daures JP, Hedon B (1998) Prospective evaluation of falloposcopy. Hum Reprod 13:1815–1818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordts S, Puttemans P, Gordts S, Brosens I, Campo R (2005) Transvaginal laparoscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19:757–767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watrelot A, Dreyfus JM, Andine JP (1999) Evaluation of the performance of fertiloscopy in 160 consecutive infertile patients with no obvious pathology. Hum Reprod 14:707–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Puttemans PJ, De Bruyne F, Heylen SM (1998) A decade of salpingoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 81:197–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marana R, Rizzi M, Muzii L et al. (1995) Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery. Fertil Steril 64:924–929

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Suzuki T, Shibahara H, Hirano Y et al. (2005) Feasibility and clinical significance of endoluminal assessment by transvaginal salpingoscopy during transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy in infertile women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:420–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Watrelot A, Nisolle M, Chelli H et al. (2003) Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: the ‘FLY’ (Fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) study. Hum Reprod 18:834–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dechaud H, Ali Ahmed SA, Aligier N et al. (2001) Does transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy render standard diagnostic laparoscopy obsolete for unexplained infertility investigation? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 94:97–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Watrelot A, Dreyfus JM, Cohen M (2002) Systematic salpingoscopy and microsalpingoscopy during fertiloscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:453–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watrelot A, Hamilton J, Grudzinskas JG (2003) Advances in the assessment of the uterus and fallopian tube function. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 17:187–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marconi G, Quintana R (1998) Methylene blue dyeing of cellular nuclei during salpingoscopy, a new in-vivo method to evaluate vitality of tubal epithelium. Hum Reprod 13:3414–3417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. De Bruyne F, Puttemans P, Boeckx W, Brosens I (1989) The clinical value of salpingoscopy in tubal infertility. Fertil Steril 51:339–340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brosens I, Boeckx W, Delattin P et al. (1987) Salpingoscopy: a new pre-operative diagnostic tool in tubal infertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:768–773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marana R, Catalano GF, Muzii L (2003) Salpingoscopy Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15:333–336

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marchino GL, Gigante V, Gennarelli G et al. (2001) Salpingoscopic and laparoscopic investigations in relation to fertility outcome. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:218–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marana R, Catalano GF, Muzii L et al. (1999) The prognostic role of salpingoscopy in laparoscopic tubal surgery. Hum Reprod 14:2991–2995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. De Bruyne F, Hucke J, Willers R. The prognostic value of salpingoscopy. Hum Reprod 1997;12(2):266–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vasquez G, Boeckx W, Brosens I (1995) Prospective study of tubal mucosal lesions and fertility in hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod 10:1075–1078

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. De Graef M, Juhan V, Kassem Z et al. (2005) Hystérosalp-ingographie et cathétérisme sélectif des trompes. Encycl Med Chir (Paris, Elsevier SAS) 34–605–A–10

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rouanet JP, Chalut JC (1977) Une application du cathétérisme sélectif: la salpingographie. Nouv Press Med 31:2785

    Google Scholar 

  24. J Chalut, Lemaitre G, Tubiana JM, Weill F (1980 ) Gynécologie. In: Fischgold H, ed. Traité de radiodiagnostic tome 9. Paris, Masson

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thurmond AS, Novy M, Uchida B, Rosch J (1987) Fallopian tube obstruction: selective salpingography and recanalization. Radiology 163:511–514

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thurmond AS, Rosch J (1990) Nonsurgical fallopian tube recanalization for treatment of infertility. Radiology 174:371–374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thurmond AS (1994) Pregnancies after selective salpingography and tubal recanalization. Radiology 190:11–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thurmond AS (1998) Interventional radiology in the treatment of infertility: fallopian tube catheterization. Radiographics 18:919–922

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thurmond AS, Machan LS, Maubon AJ et al. (2000) A review of selective salpingography and fallopian tube catheterization. Radiographics 20:1759–1768

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thurmond AS, Cohen DJ, Geller ME et al. (2000) Selective salpingography and proximal tubal recanalization by community radiologist. J Women Imaging 2:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thurmond AS, Rösch J (1990) Nonsurgical fallopian tube recanalization for treatement of infertility. Radiology 174:74–79

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tristant H, Benmussa M (1994) Indication, technique et aspects normaux. In: Tristant H, Benmussa, eds. Atlas d’hystérosalpingographie. Paris, Masson: 9–34

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tristant H, Benmussa M (1994) Fibromyomes. In: Tristant H, Benmussa, eds. Atlas d’hystérosalpingographie. Paris, Masson: 93–118

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rouanet JP, Maubon A, Lopez FM et al. (1991) Salpingographie sélective et radiologie interventionnelle tubaire. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 86:731–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Maubon AJ, De Graef M, Boncoeur-Martel MP, Rouanet JP (2001) Interventional radiology in female infertility: technique and role. European Radiol 11:771–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Osada H, Kiyoshi Fujii T, Tsunoda I et al. (2000) Outpatient evaluation and treatement of tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril 73:1032–1036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sulak PJ, Letterie G, Coddington C et al. (1987) Histology of proximal tubal occlusions. Fertil Steril 48:437–440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kerrin JF, Surrey ES, Williams DB et al. (1991) Faolloposcopic observation of endotubal isthmic plugs as a cause of reversible obstruction and their histological characterization. J Laparoendosc Surg 1:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Letterie GS, Sakas EL (1991) Histology of proximal tubal obstruction in cases of unsuccessfull tubal canalization. Fertil Steril 56:831–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tristant H, Benmussa M (1994) Diverticule, endométriose, polypes et cancer tubaires. In: Tristant H, Benmussa eds. Atlas d’hystérosalpingographie. Paris, Masson:183–200

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lang EK, Dunaway HE (2000) Efficacy of salpingography and transcervical recanalization in diagnosis categorization, and treatment of fallopian tube obstruction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23:471–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rouanet JP, Maubon A, Ferru JM, Marès P (1998) Salpingographie sélective et radiologie interventionnelle tubaire. In: Ardaens Y, Cornud F, eds. Imagerie et infertilité du couple. Paris, Masson: 145–151

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kamiyama S, Miyagi H, Kanazawa K (2000) Therapeutic value of selective salpingography for infertile women with patent fallopian tubes: the impact on pregnancy rate. Gynecol Obstet Invest 49:36–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Papaionnou S, Afnan M, Girling AJ et al. (2003) Diagnostic and therapeutic value of selective salpingography and tubal catheterization in an unselected infertile population. Fertil Steril 79:613–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Papaionnou S, Afnan M, Girling AJ et al. (2002) Longterm fertility prognosis following selective salpingography and tubal catherization in women with proximal tubal blocage. Hum Reprod 17:2325–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Woolcott R, Fisher S, Thomas J, Kable W (1999) A randomized, prospective, controlled study of laparoscopic dye studies and selective salpingography as diagnostic tests of fallopian tube patency. Fertil Steril 72:785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Maubon A, Rouanet JP, Cover S et al. (1992) Fallopian tube recanalization by elective salpingography: an alternative to more invasive techniques? Hum Reprod 7:1425–1428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Nakamura K, Ishiguchi T, Maekoshi et al. (1996) Selective fallopian tube catheterization in female infertility: clinical results and absorbed radiation dose. Eur Radiol 6:565–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Karande VC, Pratt DE, Balin MS et al. (1997) What is the radiation exposure during a gynecoradiologic procedure? Fertil Steril 67:401–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dechaud, H., Rouanet, JP., Viala Trentini, M., Dechanet, C. (2011). Exploration tubaire: tuboscopie et cathétérisme tubaire sélectif. In: Physiologie, pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez l’humain. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0060-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0061-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics