Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Physiologie, pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez l’humain pp 261–266Cite as

Malformations utérines et reproduction

  • Chapter

  • 892 Accesses

Résumé

La mise en évidence d’une malformation utérine, voire utéro-annexielles, de découverte fortuite lors d’un bilan d’infertilité du couple, demande une expertise spécifique (1). La fréquence des malformations utérines varie en fonction des populations étudiées, qu’elles soient fertiles ou infertiles. En effet, la fréquence des malformations utérines ayant un impact sur la reproduction reste difficile à apprécier. Elle varie en fonction des séries de 0,5 à 47% (2–7). D’ailleurs, plusieurs classifications sont à notre disposition comme références, ceci rendant parfois malaisées les comparaisons entre les séries. Les Anglo-Saxonnes faisant plutôt référence à la classification de l’American Fertility Society (AFS) (8, 9) et les Francophones se référant à la classification de Musset et Belaich (10) ne permettent pas systématiquement de validation ubiquitaire, de critères pronostiques ni de gestes codifiés. De plus, les critères diagnostiques des malformations utérines ont été dépendants des méthodes diagnostiques utilisées.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Nahum GG (1998) Uterine abnormalities. How common are they and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 43:876–887

    Google Scholar 

  2. Porcu G, Heckenroth H (2005) Malformations utérines et infertilité. Encycl Med Chir (Paris, Elsevier SAS) Gynécologie: 739–A–20

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pellicer A (1997) Shall we operate on mullerian defects? An introduction to the debate. Hum Reprod 12:1371–1372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J et al. (1997) Reproductive impact of congenital mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 12:2277–2281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Valli E, Zupi E, Marconi D et al. (2001) Hystéroscopic findings in 344 women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:398–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heinonen PK (2000) Clinical implications of the didel-phic uterus: long-term follow-up of 49 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 91:183–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Acien P, Acien M, Sanchez-Ferrer M (2004) Complex malformations of the female genital tract. New types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod 19:2377–2384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buttram VC, Gibbons WE (1979) Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification: an analysis of 144 cases. Fertil Steril 32:40–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. American Fertility Society (1988) American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancy, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955

    Google Scholar 

  10. Musset R, Belaich J (1964) Nécessité d’une classification globale des malformations utérines. In: XXIIes Assises françaises de gynécologie. Paris, Masson

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC (2008) Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Human Reprod Update 14:415–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu MH, Hsu CC, Huang KE (1997) Detection of congenital mullerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 25:487–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alborzi S, Dehbashi S, Parsanezhad ME (2002) Differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate utérus by sono-hysterography éliminâtes the need for laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 78:176–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin PC (2004) Reproductive outcomes in women with uterine anomalies. J Womens Health 13:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Acien P (1993) Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformtions. Hum Reprod 8:122–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bibbo M, Gill WB, Azizi F et al. (1977) Follow-up study of male and female offspring of DES-exposed mothers. Obstet Gynecol 49:1–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaufman RH, Adam E (2002) Findings in female offspring of women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Obstet Gynecol 99:197–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Palmer JR, Hatch EE, Rao RS et al (2001) Infertility among women exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol. J Epidemiol 154:316–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reichman D, Laufer MR, Robinson BK (2009) Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review. Fertil Steril 91:1886–1894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fedele L, Arcaini L et al. (1993) Reproductive prognosis after hystéroscopic metroplasty in 102 women: life-table analysis. Fertil Steril 59:768–772

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz Z, Ben-Arie A, Lurie S et al (1996) Beneficial effect of hysteroscopic metroplasty on the reproductive outcome in a “T-shaped” uterus. Gynecol Obstet Invest 41:41–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Heinonen PK (1997) Unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn. Fertil Steril 68:224–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pal L, Shifren JL et al. (1997) Outcome of IVF in DES-exposed daughters: experience in the 90s. J Assist Reprod Genet 14:513–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Donderwinkel PF, Dorr JP, Willemsen WN (1992) The unicornuate uterus: clinical implications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 47:135–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Airoldi J, Berghella V, Sehdev H, Ludmir J (2005) Transvagi-nal ultrasonography of the cervix to predict preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 106:53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Heinonen PK (2004) Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia associated with unilateral renal agenesis in women with uterine malformations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 114:39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Samuels TA, Awonuga A (2005) Second-trimester rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy: rupture after labor induction with misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol 106:1160–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cousins L, Karp W, Lacey C, Lucas WE (1980) Reproductive outcome of women exposed to diethylstilbetrol in utero. Obstet Gynecol 56:70–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Archer GE, Furlong LA (1987) Acute abdomen caused by placenta percreta in second trimester. J Obstet Gynecol 157:146–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bellucci M, DiOrio J, Moubayed S (1987) Uterine inversion secondary to placenta accreta in a diethylstilbestrol-exposed parturient. A case report. J Reprod Med 32:236–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kerjean A, Poirot C, Epelboin S, Jouannet P (1999) Effect of in-utero diethylstilbestrol exposure on human oocyte quality and fertilization in a programme of in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 14:1578–1581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lavergne N, Aristizabal J, Zatka V (1996) Uterine anomalies and in vitro fertilization: what are the results? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 68:29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nahra-Lynch M, Toffle RC (1997) Multiple gestation in a unicornuate uterus. A case report. J Reprod Med 42:451–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Karande VC, Lester RG et al. 1990 Are implantation and pregnancy outcome impaired in diethylstilbestrol-exposed women after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer? Fertil Steril 54:287–291

    Google Scholar 

  35. Strassman EO (1952) Plastic unification of double uterus: a study of 123 collected and five personal cases. J Obstet Gynecol 64:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  36. Golan A, Langer R et al. (1992) Obstetric outcome in women with congenital uterine malformations. J Reprod Med 37:233–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Daly DC, Maier D, Soto-Albors C (1989) Hysteroscopic metroplasty: six year’s experience. Obstet Gynecol 73:201–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bacsko G (1997) Uterine surgery by operative hysteroscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 71:219–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Grimbizis GF, Camus M et al. (2001) Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment. Hum Reprod Update 7:161–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zabak K, Benifla JL, Uzan S (2001) Septate utérus and reproduction disorders: current results of hysteroscopic septoplasty. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 29:829–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H et al. (2007) Small utérine septum is an important variable for preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135:154–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Agostini A, de Guibert F, Salari MD et al. (2009) Adverse obstetric outcomes at term after hysteroscopic metroplasty. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:454–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Garbin O, Ohl J, Bettahar-Lebugle K, Dellenbach P (1998) Hysteroscopic metroplasty in diethylstilbestrol-exposed and hypoplastic uterus: a report of 24 cases. Hum Reprod 13:2751–2755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pôle Femme et Enfant, CHU Jean Verdier, Avenue du 14-Juillet, 93140, Bondy

    O. Chanelles & C. Poncelet

  2. UFR SMBH Leonard de Vinci, Université Paris 13, Bobigny

    O. Chanelles & C. Poncelet

Authors
  1. O. Chanelles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Poncelet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chanelles, O., Poncelet, C. (2011). Malformations utérines et reproduction. In: Physiologie, pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez l’humain. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0060-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0061-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation