Skip to main content
  • 928 Accesses

Résumé

L’infertilité est définie pour l’Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS) par l’absence de grossesse au bout de 24 mois de rapports sexuels réguliers non protégés chez les couples en âge de procréer (femme âgée de 18 à 45 ans). Après 2 ans, 5 % des couples sont dits infertiles avec un taux de grossesse spontanée proche de zéro (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G (2005) Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod 20:1144–1147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brzakowski M, Lourdel E, Cabry R et al. (2009) Epidémiologie du couple infertile. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 38:F3–F7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leridon H, Slama R (2008) The impact of a decline in fecundity and of pregnancy postponement on final number of children and demand for assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 23:1312–1319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gougeon A (2005) The biological aspects of risks of infertility due to age: the female side. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 53:2S37–2S45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khoshnood B, Bouvier-Colle MH, Leridon H, Blondel B (2008) Impact de l’âge maternel élevé sur la fertilité,la santé de la mère et la santé de l’enfant. J Gynécologie Obstet Biol Reprod 37:733–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ (1982) La fédération des centres d’étude et de conservation du sperme humain. Female fecundity as a function of age. N Engl J med 307:404–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartz D.(1981) Importance de la durée d’infécondité dans l’appréciation de la fertilité du couple. Population 2:237–250

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leridon J (2004) Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the material decline in fertility with age. Hum Reprod 19:1548–1553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Belaisch-Allart J (2001) Insémination intra-utérine ou fécondation in vitro. Pourquoi choisir l’insémination en premier dans la plupart des situations. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 29:567–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frederick JC, Denkerms Rojas A, Horta I et al. (1994) Is there a role for ovarian stimulation and intra uterine insemination after age 40. Hum Reprod 9:2284–2286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. FIVNAT (2006) Bilan général 2000–2004. Dossier FIVNAT 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ron-El R, Raziel A, Strass-Burger D et al. (2000) Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in women over the age of 41. Fertil Steril 74:471–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nikolettos N, Kupker W, AlHasani S et al. (2000) ICSI outcome in patients of 40 years age and ova a retrospective analysis. European J Gynecol Reprod Biol 91:177–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Silber S, Nagy Z, Devroey P et al. (1997) The effet of female age and ovarian reserve in male infertility: treatment of azoospermia with sperm retrevial and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 12:2653–2700

    Google Scholar 

  15. FIVNAT 1997 (1997) Age et AMP. Contracept Fertil Sex 25:503–506

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frydman R, Righini C (1998) Doit-on prendre en charge en AMP les femmes sans limite d’âge ? Contracept Fertil Sex 26:509–511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brossens I, Gordts S, Valkenburg M et al. (2005) Investigation of the infertile couple: when is the appropriate time to explore female infertility. Hum Reprod 20:2672–2674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Broer S, ben Willem J, Hendriks D, Broekmans F (2009) The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction ofout-come after IVF: comparison with the antral folliclecount Fertil Steril 91:705–713

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharara F, Scott T, Seifer D (1998) The detection of diminished ovarian reserve in infertile women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:804–812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hall J, Welt C, Cramer D (1999) Inhibine A and inhibine B reflect ovarian function in assisted reproduction but are less useful at predicting outcome. Hum Reprod 14:409–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A et al. (1991) Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988–1989). Hum Reprod 6:811–816

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maheshawari A, Hamilton M and Bhattacharya S (2008) Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility. Hum Reprod 23:538–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gleicher N, Barad D (2006) Unexplained: does it really exits? Hum Reprod 21:1951–1955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Augood C, Duckitt K, Templeton AA (1998) Smoking and female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod 6:1532–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Mouzon J, Belaisch-Allart J (2005) Consequences on women’s fecundity and on assisted reproductive technology. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 34:3S112–3S118

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hull MG, North K, Taylor H et al. (2000) Delayed conception and active and passive smoking. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood Study Team. Fertil Steril 74:725–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bolumar F, Olsen J, Boldsen J (1996) Smoking reduces fecundity: a European multicenter study on infertility and subfecundity. The European Study Group on Infertility and Subfecundity. Am J Epidemiol 143:578–857

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Winter E, Wang J, Davies MJ, Norman R (2002) Early pregnancy loss following assisted reproductive technology treatment. Hum Reprod 17:3220–3223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jick H, Porter J (1977) Relation between smoking and age of natural menopause. Report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Boston University Medical Center. Lancet 1:1354–1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rich-Edwards JW, Goldman MB, Willett WC et al. (1994) Adolescent body mass index and infertility caused by ovulatory disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:171–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rich-Edwards JW, Spiegelman D, Garland M et al. (2002) Physical activity, body mass index and ovulatory disorder infertility. Epidemiology 13:184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Imani B, Eijkmans MJ, te Velde ER et al. (1998) Predictors of patients remaining anovulatory during clomiphene citrate induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic oligoamenorrheic infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2361–2365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Imani B, Eijkmans MJ, de Jong FH et al. (2000) Free androgen index and leptine are the most prominent endocrine predictors of ovarian response during clomifene citrate induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic oligoamenorrheic infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:676–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Imani B, Marinus JC, Eijkemans MJ et al. (2002) A monogram to predict the probability of live birth after clomiphene citrate induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic oligoamenorrheic infertility. Fertil Steril 77:91–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van Wely M, Fauser BC, Laven JS et al. (2006) Validation of a prediction model for the follicle-stimulating hormone response dose in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 86:1710–1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gesink Law DC, Maclehose RF, Lonnecker MP (2007) Obesity and time to pregnancy. Human Reprod 22:414–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ramlau-Hansen CH, Thulstrup AM, Nohr EA et al. (2008) Obesity affects spontaneous pregnancy chances in subfertile, ovulatory women. Human Reprod 23:324–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJC et al. (2008) Obesity affects spontaneous pregnancy chances in subfertile, ovulatory women. Human Reprod 23:324–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lashen H, Fear and Strudee DW (2004) Obesity is associated with increased risk of first trimester and recurrent miscarriage: matched case-control study. Human Reprod 19:1644–1646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Thumb MY, El-Sheikhah A, Faris R et al. (2007) The influence of body mass index to in-vitro fertilisation treatment outcome, risk of miscarriage and pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol 27:699–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S, Johnson NP (2008) Predicting fertility. Human Fertil 51:242–244

    Google Scholar 

  42. Homan GF, Davies M, Norman R (2007) The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Human Reprod Update 13:209–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belaisch-Allart, J. (2011). Épidémiologie de la fertilité féminine. In: Physiologie, pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez l’humain. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0060-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0061-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics