Abstract
Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction has gained a great interest in the scientific community over the last decades. Despite this increasing interest, the management of PCL injuries remains a matter of debate, largely due to the lack of prospective studies delineating the true natural history of the injury and the absence of randomized trials comparing the outcomes of current modes of treatment. Furthermore, from the clinical viewpoint, PCL injuries are associated with a great variety of peripheral lesions, justifying the diffi culties in recruiting homogenous study group. Then different surgical techniques, using different type of grafts with different rehabilitation protocol make the comparison more diffi cult (Fig. 1).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clancy WG, Jr., Shelbourne KD, Zoellner GB, et al. (1983) Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Report of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg 65A:310–322
Mariani PP, Adriani E, Santori N, Maresca G (1997) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-tendon-bone patellar graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:239–244
Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2002) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of quadriceps tendon autograft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy 18:603–612
Sekiya K, West RV, Ong BC (2005) Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Arthrosc Relat Surg 21:1042–1050
Kim SJ, Shin SJ, Kim HK, et al. (2000) Comparison of 1-and 2-incision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 16:268–278
Garofalo R, Jolles BM, Moretti B, Siegrist O (2006) Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy 22(12):1331–1338
Chan YS, Yang SC, Chang CH, et al. (2006) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with use of a quadruple hamstring tendon graft with 3-to 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 22(7):762–770
Wu CH, Chen AC, Yuan LJ, et al. (2007) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament by using a quadriceps tendon autograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 23(4):420–427
Baker CL, Jr., Norwood LA, Hughston JC (1984) Acute combined posterior cruciate and posterolateral instability of the knee. Am J Sports Med 1984;12:204–208
Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two-strand quadriceps tendonpatellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(6):1241–1252
Wang CJ, Chen HS, Huang TW, Yuan LJ (2002) Outcome of surgical reconstruction for posterior cruciate and posterolateral instabilities of the knee. Injury 33(9):815–821
Freeman RT, Duri ZA, Dowd GS (2002) Combined chronic posterior cruciate and posterolateral corner ligamentous injuries: a comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without reconstruction of the posterolateral corner. Knee 9(4):309–312
Kim SJ, Shin SJ, Jeong JH (2003) Posterolateral rotatory instability treated by a modifi ed biceps rerouting technique: technical considerations and results in cases with and without posterior cruciate ligament insuffi ciency. Arthroscopy 19(5):493–499
Fanelli GC, Edson CJ (2004) Combined posterior cruciate ligament-posterolateral reconstructions with Achilles tendon allograft and biceps femoris tendon tenodesis: 2-to 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 20(4):339–345
Houe T, Jørgensen U (2004) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one-vs. two-tunnel technique. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14(2):107–111
Wang CJ, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Chan YS (2004) Arthroscopic single-versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. Injury 35(12):1293–1299
Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, et al. (2006) A comparison of arthroscopic single-and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop 35(12):568–571
MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, et al. (2006) Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 22(3):320–328
Seon JK, Song EK (2006) Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques. Arthroscopy 22(1):27–32
Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Amaro J, et al. (2005) Interventions for treating posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD002939
Noyes FR (1996) PCL & posterolateral complex injuries. Overview. Am J Knee Surg 9(4):171
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag France, Paris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Margheritini, F., Aboelnour, M., Mariani, P.P. (2012). Results of PCL reconstruction. In: The Knee Joint. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99353-4_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99353-4_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99352-7
Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99353-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)