Skip to main content

Results of PCL reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction has gained a great interest in the scientific community over the last decades. Despite this increasing interest, the management of PCL injuries remains a matter of debate, largely due to the lack of prospective studies delineating the true natural history of the injury and the absence of randomized trials comparing the outcomes of current modes of treatment. Furthermore, from the clinical viewpoint, PCL injuries are associated with a great variety of peripheral lesions, justifying the diffi culties in recruiting homogenous study group. Then different surgical techniques, using different type of grafts with different rehabilitation protocol make the comparison more diffi cult (Fig. 1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clancy WG, Jr., Shelbourne KD, Zoellner GB, et al. (1983) Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Report of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg 65A:310–322

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mariani PP, Adriani E, Santori N, Maresca G (1997) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-tendon-bone patellar graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:239–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2002) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of quadriceps tendon autograft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy 18:603–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sekiya K, West RV, Ong BC (2005) Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Arthrosc Relat Surg 21:1042–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim SJ, Shin SJ, Kim HK, et al. (2000) Comparison of 1-and 2-incision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 16:268–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garofalo R, Jolles BM, Moretti B, Siegrist O (2006) Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy 22(12):1331–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan YS, Yang SC, Chang CH, et al. (2006) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with use of a quadruple hamstring tendon graft with 3-to 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 22(7):762–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu CH, Chen AC, Yuan LJ, et al. (2007) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament by using a quadriceps tendon autograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 23(4):420–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker CL, Jr., Norwood LA, Hughston JC (1984) Acute combined posterior cruciate and posterolateral instability of the knee. Am J Sports Med 1984;12:204–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two-strand quadriceps tendonpatellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(6):1241–1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang CJ, Chen HS, Huang TW, Yuan LJ (2002) Outcome of surgical reconstruction for posterior cruciate and posterolateral instabilities of the knee. Injury 33(9):815–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman RT, Duri ZA, Dowd GS (2002) Combined chronic posterior cruciate and posterolateral corner ligamentous injuries: a comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without reconstruction of the posterolateral corner. Knee 9(4):309–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SJ, Shin SJ, Jeong JH (2003) Posterolateral rotatory instability treated by a modifi ed biceps rerouting technique: technical considerations and results in cases with and without posterior cruciate ligament insuffi ciency. Arthroscopy 19(5):493–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fanelli GC, Edson CJ (2004) Combined posterior cruciate ligament-posterolateral reconstructions with Achilles tendon allograft and biceps femoris tendon tenodesis: 2-to 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 20(4):339–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Houe T, Jørgensen U (2004) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one-vs. two-tunnel technique. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14(2):107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang CJ, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Chan YS (2004) Arthroscopic single-versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. Injury 35(12):1293–1299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, et al. (2006) A comparison of arthroscopic single-and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop 35(12):568–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, et al. (2006) Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 22(3):320–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seon JK, Song EK (2006) Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques. Arthroscopy 22(1):27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Amaro J, et al. (2005) Interventions for treating posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD002939

    Google Scholar 

  21. Noyes FR (1996) PCL & posterolateral complex injuries. Overview. Am J Knee Surg 9(4):171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Margheritini, F., Aboelnour, M., Mariani, P.P. (2012). Results of PCL reconstruction. In: The Knee Joint. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99353-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99353-4_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99352-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99353-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics