Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plaies nerveuses : lésion nerveuse simple

  • Chapter
La traumatologie des parties molles de la main

Part of the book series: Approche pratique en orthopédie-traumatologie ((APPRPRAT))

  • 523 Accesses

Résumé

Les plaies des nerfs collatéraux palmaires doivent être considérées comme des lésions graves. À ce titre, il est nécessaire qu’elles soient traitées en urgence par des opérateurs entraînés aux techniques de réparation microchirurgicale. En cas d’échec, elles font en effet courir au patient un risque de névromes douloureux, de paresthésies, d’hypo- ou d’anesthésies pulpaires dont le retentissement peut être sévère, en particulier pour la fonction des pulpes dominantes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Lundborg G (1979) The intrinsic vascularization of human peripheral nerve. J Hand Surg 4: 34–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer VE, Namoli B, Lassmann H (1980) The surgical cut-surface of peripheral nerves. Int J Microsurg 2: 187–192

    Google Scholar 

  3. Millesi H (1986) Peripheral nerve surgery. Hand Clinics. Saunders WB, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cabaud HE, Rodkey WG, McCaroll HR (1976) Epineural and perineural fascicular nerve repairs: A critical comparison. J Hand Surg 1: 131–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Orgel MG, Terzis JK (1977) Epineurial versus perineurial repair: an ultrastructural and electrophysiological study of nerve regeneration. Plast Reconstrut Surg 60: 80–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Terzis JK, Faibisoff B, William HB (1975) The nerve gap: suture under tension vs graft. Plast Reconstruct Surg 56: 166–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tupper JW, Crick JC, Matteck LR (1988) Fascicular nerve repairs. A comparative study of epineural and fascicular techniques. Orthop Clin North Am 19: 57–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Young L, Wray RC, Weeks PM (1981) A randomized prospective comparison of fascicular and epineural digital nerve repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg 68: 89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertelli JA, Mira JC (1993) Nerve repair using freezing and fibrin glue wrapping. Immediate histologic improvement of axonal coaptation. Microsurgery 14: 135–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert A (1989) Les colles biologiques. Arguments expérimentaux et cliniques. Ann Chir Main 8: 300–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Narakas A (1988) The use of fibrin glue in repair of peripheral nerves. Orthop Clin North Am 19: 187–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Calteux N, Binsely J, Schoofs M, De Conninck A (1984) Utilisation d’un segment veineux dans la réparation des nerfs périphériques. Ann Chir Main 2: 149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guinard D (2000) Substituts des nerfs utilisés comme greffons. In: Cahier d’enseignement de la Société Française de Chirurgie de la main. Elsevier, Paris, p. 65–79

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lundborg G (1991) Neurotropism, frozen muscle grafts and other conduits. J Hand Surg 16B: 473–476

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pereira JH, Bowden REM, Gattuso JM, Norris RW (1991) Comparison of results of repair of digital nerves by denatured muscle graft and end-to-end sutures. J Hand Surg 16B: 519–523

    Google Scholar 

  16. Politis MJ, Ederle K, Spencer PS (1982) Tropism in nerve regeneration, in vivo attraction of regenerating axons by diffusible factors derived from cells in distal nerve stumps of transrected peripheral nerve. Brain Res 253: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Poppen NK, Mc Carrol HR, Doyle JR, Niebauer JJ (1979) Recovery of sensibility after suture of digital nerves. J Hand Surg 4: 212–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Seekel BR, Chiu TH, Nyilas E, Sidman RL (1984) Nerve regeneration through synthetic biodegradable nerve guides: regulation by the target organ. Plast Reconstr Surg 74: 173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang JB (1995) Vein conduits with interposition of nerve tissue for peripheral nerve defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 11: 21–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tenny RJ, Lewis RC (1984) Digital nerve grafting for traumatic defects. J Bone Joint Surg 66A: 1375–1379

    Google Scholar 

  21. Voche P, Ouattara D (2005) End-to-side neurorraphy for defects of palmar sensory digital nerves. Br J Plast Surg 58: 239–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Comtet JJ (1987) La sensibilité: physiologie, examen, principes de la rééducation de la sensation. Ann Chir Main 6: 230–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dubert T, Dinh A, Osman N (2006) Evaluation des résultats après prise en charge d’une plaie de la main. In: Cahiers d’enseignement de la SOFCOT. Elsevier, Paris, 93, p. 234–241

    Google Scholar 

  24. Möberg E (1958) Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility of the skin. J Bone Joint Surg 40B: 454–476

    Google Scholar 

  25. Allieu Y, Alnot JY (1978) Résultats des sutures nerveuses sous microscope. Rev Chir Orthop 64: 276–283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Altissimi M, Mancini GB, Azzara A (1991) Results of repair of digital nerves. J Hand Surg 16B: 546–547

    Google Scholar 

  27. Buncke HJ (1972) Digital nerve repairs. Surg Clin North Am 52: 1267–1285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chaise F, Friol JP, Gaisne E (1993) Résultats de la réparation en urgence des plaies des nerfs collatéraux palmaires des doigts. Rev Chir Orthop 79: 393–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chaise F (2000) Les plaies des nerfs collatéraux palmaires des doigts. Cahier d’enseignement de la Société Française de Chirurgie de la main. Elsevier, Paris, p.67–80

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chaise F (2007) Les plaies des nerfs collatéraux palmaires des doigts. In: Lésions traumatiques des nerfs périphériques. Cahiers d’enseignement de la SOFCOT. Elsevier, Paris, no 97, p. 113–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldie BS, Coates CJ, Birch R (1992) The long term results of digital nerve repair in no man’s land. J Hand Surg 17B: 75–77

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kallio PK (1993) The results of secondary repair of 254 digital nerves. J Hand Surg 18B: 327–330

    Google Scholar 

  33. Khuc T, Leclercq D, Carlier A, Depierreux L, Lejeune G (1982) Réparation microchirugicale de 110 nerfs collatéraux. Acta Chir Belg 3: 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  34. Onne L (1962) Recovery of sensibility and sudomotor activity in the hand after nerve suture. Acta Chir Scand (Suppl) 300: 1–70

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nonnenmacher J, Rapp E (2004) La main neurologique périphérique. Rev Fr Dommage Corp 4: 289–304

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sullivan DJ (1985) Results of digital neuroraphy in adults. J Hand Surg 10B: 4–44

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tropet Y (2000) Réparation des nerfs digitaux: techniques, résultats et indications. In: Cahier d’enseignement de la Société Française de Chirurgie de la main. Elsevier, Paris, p. 47–63

    Google Scholar 

  38. Honner R, Frigiadakis FG, Lamb W (1970) An investigation of factors affecting the results of digital nerve division. Hand 12: 21–31

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mackinnon SE, Dellon LA (1988) Surgery of the peripheral nerve. Thieme Ed, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Merle M, Amend P, Foucher G, Michon J (1984) Plaidoyer pour la réparation primaire microchirurgicale des lésions des nerfs périphériques. Chirurgie 110: 761–771

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Starkweather RJ, Neviaser RJ, Adams JP, Parsons DB (1978) The effect of devascularisation on the regeneration of lacerated peripheral nerves. J Hand Surg 3: 163–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sunderland S (1991) Nerve injuries and their repair. A critical appraisal. Churchill Livingstone, London

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dellon AL, Kallman CM (1983) Evaluation of functional sensation in the hand. J Hand Surg 8: 865–870

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Dellon AL (1981) Evaluation of sensibility and reeducation of sensation in the hand. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE (1987) Reliability of two-point discrimination measurements. J Hand Surg 12A: 693–696

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chow SC, NG C (1993) Can a divided digital nerve on one side of the finger be left unrepaired? J Hand Surg 18B: 629–630

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dumontier C, Kloos M, Dap F, Merle M (1990) Greffes nerveuses des collatéraux des doigts. À propos d’une série de 16 cas revus. Rev Chir Orthop 76: 311–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Leclercq DC, Carlier AC, Khuc T, Depierreux L, Lejeune GN (1985) Improvement in the results in 64 ulnar nerve sections associated with arterial repair. J Hand Surg 10A: 997–999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nantes Assistance Mains, Clinique Jeanne d’Arc, 21, rue des martyrs, 44100, Nantes

    F. Chaise

Authors
  1. F. Chaise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaise, F. (2011). Plaies nerveuses : lésion nerveuse simple. In: La traumatologie des parties molles de la main. Approche pratique en orthopédie-traumatologie. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99068-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99068-7_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99067-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99068-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation