Skip to main content

Techniques locorégionales d’analgésie en réanimation adulte

  • Chapter
Analgésie et sédation en réanimation

Part of the book series: Le point sur ... ((POINT))

  • 521 Accesses

Resume

L’analgésie intraveineuse ou la sédation-analgésie sont les techniques de référence en réanimation. Dans certaines situations, les techniques d’analgésie locorégionales présentent une alternative intéressante. Lorsqu’elles sont applicables, les techniques locorégionales ont plusieurs avantages: un contrôle sélectif et de meilleure qualité de la douleur (principalement à la mobilisation), un effet d’épargne en opiacés évitant leurs effets secondaires. Plusieurs techniques d’analgésie régionales sont à la disposition du réanimateur. L’analgésie péridurale est la plus connue. Cette technique s’applique principalement aux patients ayant subi une chirurgie majeure thoracique ou abdominale. Pour les pathologies spécifiques de réanimation, cette technique s’applique aux patients souffrant de fractures de côtes multiples ou de pancréatite aiguë. Les indications des blocs périnerveux continus concernent les patients polytraumatisés souffrant de fractures des extrémités chez qui les mobilisations sont douloureuses. Dans ce contexte, les blocs périnerveux seront préférés à l’analgésie péridurale du fait de leur absence d’effets hémodynamiques. Le bloc paravertébral est préférable à l’analgésie péridurale dans le cadre de la chirurgie thoracique. La mise en place d’une technique d’analgésie locorégionale doit obéir à des règles strictes. Le consentement du patient est important. Le patient de réanimation est un sujet à risque d’hypovolémie, d’instabilité hémodynamique et de coagulopathie. L’ensemble de ces risques doit être pris en compte dans la gestion des cathéters d’analgésie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rotondi AJ, Chelluri L, Sirio C et al. (2002) Patients’ recollections of stressful experiences while receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 30: 746–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sessler CN, Wilhelm W (2008) Analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit: an overview of the issues. Crit Care 12 Suppl 3: S1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Page GG, Blakely W P, Ben-Eliyahu S (2001) Evidence that postoperative pain is a mediator of the tumor-promoting effects of surgery in rats. Pain 90: 191–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78: 606–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Puntillo KA (1990) Pain experiences of intensive care unit patients. Heart Lung 19: 526–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Whipple JK, Lewis KS, Quebbeman EJ et al. (1995) Analysis of pain management in critically ill patients. Pharmacotherapy 15:592–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chanques G, Jaber S, Barbotte E et al. (2006) Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 34: 1691–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Puntillo KA, White C, Morris AB et al. (2001) Patients’ perceptions and responses to procedural pain: results from Thunder Project II. Am J Crit Care 10: 238–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Desbiens NA, Wu AW, Alzola C et al. (1997) Pain during hospitalization is associated with continued pain six months later in survivors of serious illness. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med 102: 269–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kollef MH (1998) Prolonged use of ventilator circuits and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a model for identifying the optimal clinical practice. Chest 113: 267–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook DJ, Walter SD, Cook RJ et al. (1998) Incidence of and risk factors for ventilatorassociated pneumonia in critically ill patients. Ann Intern Med 129: 433–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin SM, Liu CY, Wang CH et al. (2004) The impact of delirium on the survival of mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 32: 2254–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR et al. (2001) Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). Jama 286: 2703–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J et al. (2001) Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 29: 1370–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B et al. (2004) Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Jama 291: 1753–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pun BT, Ely EW (2007) The importance of diagnosing and managing ICU delirium. Chest 132(2): 624–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ely EW, Gautam S, Margolin R et al. (2001) The impact of delirium in the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care Med 27(12): 1892–900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomason J W, Shintani A, Peterson JF et al. (2005) Intensive care unit delirium is an independent predictor of longer hospital stay: a prospective analysis of 261 non-ventilated patients. Crit Care 9(4): R375–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pandharipande P, Shintani A, Peterson J et al. (2006) Lorazepam is an independent risk factor for transitioning to delirium in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology 104(1): 21–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mistraletti G, Donatelli F, Carli F (2005) Metabolic and endocrine effects of sedative agents. Curr Opin Crit Care 11(4): 312–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shafer A (1998) Complications of sedation with midazolam in the intensive care unit and a comparison with other sedative regimens. Crit Care Med 26(5): 947–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Puntillo KA, Wild LR, Morris AB et al. (2002) Practices and predictors of analgesic interventions for adults undergoing painful procedures. Am J Crit Care 11: 415–29; quiz 430-1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ et al. (2003) Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. Jama 290: 2455–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu CL, Cohen SR, Richman JM et al. (2005) Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 103: 1079–88; quiz 1109-10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salomaki TE, Laitinen JO, Nuutinen LS (1991) A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after thoracotomy. Anesthesiology 75:790–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rawal N, Sjostrand U, Christoffersson E et al. (1984) Comparison of intramuscular and epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia in the grossly obese: influence on postoperative ambulation and pulmonary function. Anesth Analg 63: 583–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boylan J F, Katz J, Kavanagh BP et al. (1998) Epidural bupivacaine-morphine analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia following abdominal aortic surgery: analgesic, respiratory, and myocardial effects. Anesthesiology 89: 585–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guinard J P, Mavrocordatos P, Chiolero R, Carpenter RL (1992) A randomized comparison of intravenous versus lumbar and thoracic epidural fentanyl for analgesia after thoracotomy. Anesthesiology 77: 1108–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu SS, Wu CL. Effect of postoperative analgesia on major postoperative complications: a systematic update of the evidence. Anesth Analg 2007;104:689–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yeager M P, Glass DD, Neff RK, Brinck-Johnsen T (1987) Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in high-risk surgical patients. Anesthesiology 66: 729–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Loick HM, Schmidt C, Van Aken H et al. (1999) High thoracic epidural anesthesia, but not clonidine, attenuates the perioperative stress response via sympatholysis and reduces the release of troponin T in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 88: 701–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu CL, Rowlingson AJ, Herbert R et al. (2006) Correlation of postoperative epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality after colectomy in Medicare patients. J Clin Anesth 18: 594–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu CL, Naqibuddin M, Rowlingson AJ et al. (2003) The effect of pain on health-related quality of life in the immediate postoperative period. Anesth Analg 97: 1078–85, table of contents

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu SS, Block BM, Wu CL (2004) Effects of perioperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 101(1): 153–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, March RJ et al. (1991) Effects of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on coagulation and outcome after major vascular surgery. Anesth Analg 73: 696–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pansard JL, Mankikian B, Bertrand M et al. (1993) Effects of thoracic extradural block on diaphragmatic electrical activity and contractility after upper abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 78: 63–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bauer C, Hentz JG, Ducrocq X et al. (2007) Lung function after lobectomy: a randomized, double-blinded trial comparing thoracic epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil and intravenous morphine for patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 105:238–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gruber EM, Tschernko EM, Kritzinger M et al. (2001) The effects of thoracic epidural analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% on ventilatory mechanics in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Anesth Analg 92:1015–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Popping DM, Elia N, Marret E et al. (2008) Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 143: 990–9; discussion 1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bulger EM, Edwards T, Klotz P, Jurkovich GJ (2004) Epidural analgesia improves outcome after multiple rib fractures. Surgery 136: 426–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Freise H, Meissner A, Lauer S et al. (2008) Thoracic epidural analgesia with low concentration of bupivacaine induces thoracic and lumbar sympathetic block: a randomized, doubleblind clinical trial. Anesthesiology 109:1107–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Scott NB, Turfrey DJ, Ray DA et al. (2001) A prospective randomized study of the potential benefits of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 93: 528–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Blomberg S, Emanuelsson H, Kvist H et al. (1990) Effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on coronary arteries and arterioles in patients with coronary artery disease. Anesthesiology 73: 840–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Steinbrook RA (1998) Epidural anesthesia and gastrointestinal motility. Anesth Analg 86: 837–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Barzoi G, Carluccio S, Bianchi B et al. (2000) Morphine plus bupivacaine vs. morphine peridural analgesia in abdominal surgery: the effects on postoperative course in major hepatobiliary surgery. HPB Surg 11: 393–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Poeze M, Takala J, Greve JW, Ramsay G (2000) Pre-operative tonometry is predictive for mortality and morbidity in high-risk surgical patients. Intensive Care Med 26: 1272–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Freise H, Lauer S, Anthonsen S et al. (2006) Thoracic epidural analgesia augments ileal mucosal capillary perfusion and improves survival in severe acute pancreatitis in rats. Anesthesiology 105: 354–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Al-Rawi OY, Pennefather SH, Page RD et al. (2008) The effect of thoracic epidural bupivacaine and an intravenous adrenaline infusion on gastric tube blood flow during esophagectomy. Anesth Analg 106: 884–7, table of contents

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Adolphs J, Schmidt DK, Mousa SA et al. (2003) Thoracic epidural anesthesia attenuates hemorrhage-induced impairment of intestinal perfusion in rats. Anesthesiology 99: 685–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schricker T, Meterissian S, Wykes L et al. (2004) Postoperative protein sparing with epidural analgesia and hypocaloric dextrose. Ann Surg 240(5): 916–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lugli AK, Donatelli F, Schricker T et al. (2008) Epidural analgesia enhances the postoperative anabolic effect of amino acids in diabetes mellitus type 2 patients undergoing colon surgery. Anesthesiology 108: 1093–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bernhardt A, Kortgen A, Niesel H, Goertz A (2002) [Using epidural anesthesia in patients with acute pancreatitis-prospective study of 121 patients]. Anaesthesiol Reanim 27: 16–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lauer S, Freise H, Fischer LG et al. (2007) The role of thoracic epidural analgesia in receptor-dependent and receptor-independent pulmonary vasoconstriction in experimental pancreatitis. Anesth Analg 105: 453–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Richman JM, Liu SS, Courpas G et al. (2006) Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 102: 248–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Capdevila X, Barthelet Y, Biboulet P et al. (1999) Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery. Anesthesiology 91: 8–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Borgeat A, Perschak H, Bird P et al. (2000) Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine 0.2% versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after major shoulder surgery: effects on diaphragmatic and respiratory function. Anesthesiology 292: 102–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wu CL, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA (2001) Measurement of patient satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26: 196–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Richardson J, Sabanathan S, Jones J et al. (1999) A prospective, randomized comparison of preoperative and continuous balanced epidural or paravertebral bupivacaine on postthoracotomy pain, pulmonary function and stress responses. Br J Anaesth 83: 387–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Joshi G P, Bonnet F, Shah R et al. (2008) A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg 107(3): 1026–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Bargues L et al. (2002) Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service. Anesthesiology 97: 1274–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Brown DL, Ransom DM, Hall JA et al. (1995) Regional anesthesia and local anestheticinduced systemic toxicity: seizure frequency and accompanying cardiovascular changes. Anesth Analg 81: 321–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB et al. (2002) Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med 30: 119–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Kalberer F, Benz C (2001) Acute and nonacute complications associated with interscalene block and shoulder surgery: a prospective study. Anesthesiology 95: 875–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bergman BD, Hebl JR, Kent J, Horlocker TT (2003) Neurologic complications of 405 consecutive continuous axillary catheters. Anesth Analg 96: 247–52, table of contents

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Franco CD, Vieira ZE (2000) 1,001 subclavian perivascular brachial plexus blocks: success with a nerve stimulator. Reg Anesth Pain Med 25: 41–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lonnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, Conacher ID (1995) Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia 50:813–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Aydin ON, Eyigor M, Aydin N (2001) Antimicrobial activity of ropivacaine and other local anaesthetics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 18: 687–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Rosenberg PH, Veering BT, Urmey WF (2004) Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics: a multifactorial concept. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29: 564–75; discussion 524

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Niemi G (2005) Advantages and disadvantages of adrenaline in regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 19:229–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Horlocker T T, Burton AW, Connis RT et al. (2009) Practice guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of respiratory depression associated with neuraxial opioid administration. Anesthesiology 110:218–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rapon, C., Alfonsi, P. (2010). Techniques locorégionales d’analgésie en réanimation adulte. In: Analgésie et sédation en réanimation. Le point sur .... Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99029-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99029-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99028-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99029-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics