Abstrait
Les organismes en cours de développement sont particulièrement vulnérables. La prolifération cellulaire rapide, la différenciation cellulaire associées aux phénomènes de migration survenant lors du développement embryonnaire contribuent à cette sensibilité. Le DES traverse la barrière placentaire et induit des anomalies chez le fœtus en cours de développement. Contrairement au thalidomide qui provoque des anomalies réductionnelles immédiatement décelables, les anomalies induites par le DES sont uniquement décelables à long terme.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
Senekjian EK, Potkul RK, Frey RB et al. (1988) Infertility among daughters exposed or not exposed to diethylstilboestrol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158: 493–8
Kaufman RH, Binder GL, Grapy PM et al. (1977) Upper genital tract changes associated with exposure in utero to diethystilboestrol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 228: 51–9
Herbst AL, Hubby MM, Azizi F et al. (1988) Reproductive and gynecologic surgical experience in diethylstilboestrol exposed daughters. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141: 1019–28
Bamigboye AA, Morris J (2003) Oestrogen supplementation mainly diethylstilbestrol, for preventing miscarriages and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD004271
Troisi R et al. (2007) Cancer risk in women prenatally exposed to diethylstilbestrol. Int J Cancer 12: 356–60
Napalkown P, Anosomov VN (1979) Transplacental effect of diethylstilboestrol in female rats. Cancer lett 6: 107–14
Newbold R (2004) Lessons learned from perinatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 199: 142–50
Walker BE (1984) Tumors of female offspring of mice exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol. J Natl Cancer Inst 73: 133–40
Newbold RR, Hanson RB, Jefferson WN et al. (2000) Proliferative lesions and reproductive tract tumors in male descendants of mice exposed developmentally to diethylstilbestrol. Carcinogenesis 2: 1355–63
Klip H, Verloop J, Van Gool JD et al. (2002) Hypospadias in sons of women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a cohort study. Lancet 359: 1102–7
Forsberg JG (1975) Late effects in the vaginal and cervical epithelia after injections of diethylstilboestrol into neonatal mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121: 101–4
Hendrickx AG, Benirsche K, Thompson RS et al. (1979) The effects of prenatal diethylstilboestrol (DES) exposure on the genitalia of pubertal Macaca mulatta: I. Female offspring. J Reprod Med 22: 233–40
Mc Lachlan JA (1979) Transplacental effects of diethylstilboestrol in mice. Nat Cancer Inst Monogr 51: 69–72
Plapinger L (1981) Morphological effects in diethylstilboestrol on neonatal mouse uterus and vagina. Cancer Res 41: 4667–70
Belaisch J (1983) L’exposition au diéthylstilbestrol pendant la vie intra-utérine; signes qui doivent la faire évoquer. Implications thérapeutiques. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 12: 481–8
Thompson RS, Hess DL, Binkerd PE et al. (1981) The effects of prenatal diethylstilboestrol exposure on the genitalia of pubertal macaca mulatta II Male offspring. J Reprod Med 26: 309–16
Mc Lachlan JA (1979) Transplacental effects of diethylstilboestrol in mice. Nat Cancer Inst Monogr 51: 67–72
Lamb JC, Newbold RR, Mc Lachlan JA (1981) Vizualisation by light and scanning electron microscopy of reproductive trat lesions in female mice treated transplacentally with diethylstilboestrol. Cancer Res 41: 4057–62
Smith WO (1948) Diethysilstilboestrol in the prevention and treatment of complication of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 56: 821–34
Pons JC, Goujard J, Derbanne C et al. (1988) Devenir des grossesses des patientes exposées in utero au diéthylstilbestrol. Enquête du Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 17: 307–16
Li S, Hursting SD, Davis BJ et al. (2003) Environmental exposure, DNA methylation, and gene regulation: lessons from Diethylstilbesterol-induced cancers. Ann N Y Acad Sci 983: 161–9
Kitajewski J, Sassoon D (2000) The emergence of molecular gynecology: homeobox and Wnt genes in the female reproductive tract. Bioessays 22: 902–10
Ma L, Benson GV, Lim H et al. (1998) Abdominal B (AbdB) Hoxa genes: regulation in adult uterus by estrogen and progesterone and repression in mullerian duct by the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES). Dev. Biol. 197: 141–54
Li S, Washburn KA, Moore R et al. (1997) Developmental exposure to diethylstilbestrol elicits demethylation of estrogen-responsive lactoferrin gene in mouse uterus. Cancer Res. 57: 4356–9
Ridiger HW, Haenisch F, Metzler M (1979) Metabolites of diethylstilboestrol induce sister chromatid exchanges in human cultured fibroblasts. Nature 281: 392–4
Engel LL, Weidenfield J, Merriam GR (1976) Metabolism of diethylstilboestrol by rat liver a preliminary report. J Toxicol Environ Health Suppl 1: 37–44
Metzler M, Mc Lachlan JA (1979) Diesthylstilboestrol metabolism transformation in relation to organ specific tumor manifestation. Arch Toxicol Suppl 2: 275–80
Newbold et Li S, Hursting SD, Davis BJ et al. (2003) Environmental exposure, DNA methylation, and gene regulation: lessons from diethylstilbesterol-induced cancers. Ann N Y Acad Sci 983: 161–9
Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK (2005) Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308: 1466–9
Can A, Semiz O (2000) Diethylstilbestrol (DES)-induced cell cycle delay and meiotic spindle disruption in mouse oocytes during in-vitro maturation. Mol Hum Reprod 6: 154–62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag France, Paris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bretelle, F., Pons, J.C. (2007). Physiopathologie du DES syndrome . In: Le Distilbène® trente ans après. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-73307-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-73307-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-287-73306-2
Online ISBN: 978-2-287-73307-9