Skip to main content

Le risque histologique

  • Conference paper
  • 280 Accesses

Abstrait

Le cancer du sein, en raison de son incidence élevée et de son agressivité, a suscité la recherche active de facteurs de risque qui permettraient de mieux en comprendre les mécanismes de croissance et de prévenir et de limiter son développement. Le risque histologique se définit pour une patiente chez qui vient d’être diagnostiquée une lésion histologique bénigne comme le risque de développer ultérieurement un cancer du sein associé à la nature et l’importance de cette lésion histologique. Les lésions dites « à risque » répondent aux lésions bénignes dont le niveau de risque est élevé en comparaison avec le risque de la population générale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black MM, Barclay TH, Cutler SJ et al. (1972) Association of atypical characteristics of benign breast lesions with subsequent risk of breast cancer. Cancer 29: 338–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312: 146–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook MG, Rohan TE (1991) Benign breast disease: the relationship between its histological features and risk factors for breast cancer. Pathology 23: 286–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McDivitt RW, Stevens JA, Lee NC, Wingo PA, Rubin GL, Gersell D (1992) Histologic types of benign breast disease and the risk for breast cancer. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. Cancer 69: 1408–1414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins LC, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM, Connolly JL, Colditz GA, Schnitt SJ (2007) Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia: results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer 109: 180–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bodian CA, Perzin KH, Lattes R et al. (1993) Prognostic significance of benign proliferative breast disease. Cancer 71: 3896–3907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dupont WD, Parl FF, Hartmann WH et al. (1993) Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia. Cancer 71: 1258–1265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Palli D, Rosselli DT, Simoncini R, Bianchi S (1991) Benign breast disease and breast cancer: a case-control study in a cohort in Italy. Int J Cancer 47: 703–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaaban AM, Sloane JP, West CR et al. (2002) Histopathologic types of benign breast lesions and the risk of breast cancer: case-control study. Am J Surg Pathol 26: 421–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li CI, Daling JR, Malone KE (2005) Age-Specific Incidence Rates of in situ Breast Carcinomas by Histologie Type, 1980 to 2001. Cancer Epidemiol Biom Prev 14: 1008–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Page DL, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD et al. (2003) Atypical lobular hyperplasia as a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 361: 125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chuba PJ, Hamre MR, Yap J et al. (2005) Bilateral Risk for Subsequent Breast Cancer After Lobular Carcinoma-In-Situ: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Data. J Clin Oncol 23: 5534–5541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, Moe RE (2003) Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. JAMA 289: 1421–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schnitt SJ, Vincent-Salomon A (2003) Columnar cell lesions of the breast. Adv Anat Pathol 10: 113–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schnitt SJ (2003) The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: flat epithelial atypia-classification, pathologic features and clinical significance. Breast Cancer Res 5: 263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitzgibbons PL, Henson DE, Hutter R (1998) Benign breast changes and the risk for subsequent breast cancer: an update of the 1985 consensus statement. Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 122: 1053–1055

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elston CW, Sloane JP, Amendoeira I et al. (2000) Causes of inconsistency in diagnosing and classifying intraductal proliferations of the breast. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology. Eur J Cancer 36: 1769–1772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosai J (1991) Borderline epithelial lesions of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 15: 209–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Page D, Rogers LW (1992) Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia. Human Pathol 23: 1095–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Tavassoli FA et al. (1992) Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J Surg Pathol 16: 1133–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moinfar F, Man YG, Bratthauer GL et al. (2000) Genetic abnormalities in mammary ductal intraepithelial neoplasia-flat type (“clinging ductal carcinoma in situ”: a simulator of normal mammary epithelium. Cancer 88: 2072–2081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moinfar F, Man YG, Lininger RA et al. (1999) Use of keratin 35betaE12 as an adjunct in the diagnosis of mammary intraepithelial neoplasia-ductal type-benign and malignant intraductal proliferations. Am J Surg Pathol 23: 1048–1058

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Boecker W, Buerger H, Schmitz K et al. (2001) Ductal epithelial proliferations of the breast: a biological continuum? Comparative genomic hybridization and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin expression patterns. J Pathol 195: 415–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pérou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al. (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406: 747–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Adem C, Reynolds C, Soderberg CL et al. (2003) Pathologic characteristics of breast parenchyma in patients with hereditary breast carcinoma, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer 97: 1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Adem C, Soderberg CL, Hafner K et al. (2004) ERBB2, TBX2, RPS6KB1, and MYC alterations in breast tissues of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Genes Chromosomes. Cancer 41: 1–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. King TA, Gemignani ML, Li W et al. (2004) Increased progesterone receptor expression in benign epithelium of BRCA1-related breast cancers. Cancer Res 64: 5051–5053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guinebretière, J.M., Menet, E., Fourme, E., Chérel, P., Belichard, C. (2007). Le risque histologique. In: Cancer du sein. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71478-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71478-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-71477-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-71478-8

Publish with us

Policies and ethics