Abstrait
La question peut paraître saugrenue, les anthracyclines sont reconnues comme une classe thérapeutique majeure dans le traitement chimiothérapique des cancers du sein, au même titre que les taxanes. La quasi-totalité des études récentes — en fait toutes sauf deux à notre connaissance — a utilisé des anthracyclines dans l’évaluation des protocoles comportant des taxanes; ces études peuvent-elles, à elles seules, inverser la tendance qui considère que l’indication des anthracyclines en adjuvant est « gravée dans le marbre »?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
Bonneterre J, Roché H, Kerbrat P et al. (2005) Epirubicin increases long term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor prognosis, node positive, early breast canceer: 10-year follow up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomised trial. J Clin Oncol 23: 2686–2693
Bonneterre J, Roché H, Kerbrat P et al. (2004) Long term cardiac follow-up in relapse free patients after six courses of fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, with either 50 or 100 mg of epirubicin, as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: French Adjuvant Study Group. J Clin Oncol 22: 3070–3079
Burnell M, Levine M, Chapman JA et al. (2006) A randomized trial of CEF versus dose dense EC followed by paclitaxel versus AC followed by paclitaxel in women with node positive or high risk node negative breast cancer, NCIC-CTG MA21: results of an interim analysis; Breast Cancer Res Treat (Suppl 1): abstract 53
Buzdar AU, Ibrahim NK, Francis D et al. (2005) Significantly higher pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23: 3676–3685
Campone M, Roche H, Kerbrat P et al. (2005) Secondary leukemia after epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer patients: 16 years experience of the French Adjuvant Study Group. Ann Oncol 16: 1343–1351
Chia S, Clemons M, Martin LA et al. (2006) Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and trastuzumab in HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 24: 2773–2778
Di Leo A, Larsimont D, Gancberg D et al. (2001) HER2 and topoisomerase II alpha as predictive markers in a population of node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated with adjuvant CMF or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide. Ann Oncol 12: 1081–1089
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15 year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365: 1687–1717
Fumoleau P, Roché H, Kerbrat P et al. (2002) Cardiac toxicity in operable breast cancer patientsafter adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin; 7 year analysis in 3577 patients of the French Adjuvant Study Group trials. Breast cancer Res Treat 76(Suppl 1) 5157, abstract 640
Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD et al. (2003) Improved outcomes from adding sequential paclitaxel but not from escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21: 976–983
Jones SE, Savin MA, Holmes FA et al. (2006) PhaseIII trial comparing doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide with docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 5381–5387
Knoop AS, Knudsen H, Balslev E et al. (2006) Retrospective analysis oftopoisomerasella amplifications and deletions as predictive markers in primary breast cancer patients randomly assigned tocyclophosphamide, methotrexate andfluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil/ Danish Breast cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 24: 7483–7490
Levine MN, Pritchard KI, Bramwell VHC et al. (2005) Randomised trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluoraouracil with cyclophosphamide methotrexate and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with breast cancer: update ofNational Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials, Group Trial M5. J Clin Oncol 22: 5166–5170
Martin M, Pienkowski T, Mackey J et al. (2005) Adjuvant docetaxel for Node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 352: 2302–2313
Ng A, Taylor GM, Eden OB (2000) Treatment related leukaemia-a clinical and scientific challenge. Cancer Treat Rev 26: 377–391
Pegram MD, Konecny GE, O’Callaghan C et al. (2004) Rational combinations of trastuzumab with chemotherapeutic drugs used in the treatment of breast cancer; J Natl cancer Inst 96: 739–749
Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE et al. (2004) Effect of Doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide on left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with breast cancer in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N 9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial. J Clin Oncol 22: 3700–3704
Piccart MJ, Di Leo A, Beauduin M et al. (2001) Phase III Trial comparing wo dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in Node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19: 3103–3110
Poole CJ, Earl HM, Hiller L et al. (2006) Epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouraccil as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355: 1851–1862
Praga C, Bergh J, Bliss J et al. (2005) Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in trials of adjuvant epirubicin for early breast cancer: correlation with doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol 23: 4179–4191
Pritchard Kl, Sheperd LE, O’Malley F et al. (2006) HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 354: 2103–2111
Roché H, Fumoleau P, Spielmann P et al. (2006) Sequential adjuvant epirubicin-based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS01 trial. J Clin Oncol 36: 5664–5671
Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N et al. (2005) Phase III trial comparing AC-T with AC-TH and with TCH in the adjuvant treatment of HER2 positive early breast cancer patients: first interim efficacy analysis; Breast Canc Res Treat 94(Suppl 1): S5, Abstract 1
Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N et al. (2006) BCIRG 006: 2nd interim analysis of a phase III randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (Ac-T) with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab (AC-TH) with doxorubicin, carboplatine and trastuzumab (TCH) in HER2 positive early breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(Suppl 1): abstract 52
Smith RE, Bryant J, De Cillis A et al. (2003) Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after doxorubicinecyclophosphamide adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer: the NSABP experience. J Clin Oncol 21: 1195–1204
Tan-Chiu E, Yothers G, Romond E et al. (2005) Assessment of cardiac dysfunction in a randomised trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, with or without trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy in node positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol 23: 7811–7819
Tanner M, Isola J, Wiklund T et al. (2006) Topoisomerase II alpha gene amplification predicts favorable treatment response to tailored and dose escalated anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2/neu amplified breast cancer: Scandinavian Breast Group Trial 9401. J Clin Oncol 24: 2428–2436
Untch M, Eidtmann H, du Bois A et al. (2004) Cardiac safety of trastuzumab in combination with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with metastatic breast cancer: results of a phase I trial. Eur J Cancer 40: 988–997
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag France, Paris
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bonneterre, J. (2007). Peut-on se passer des anthracyclines?. In: Cancer du sein. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71478-8_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71478-8_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-287-71477-1
Online ISBN: 978-2-287-71478-8