Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Le risque, son appréciation, sa gestion. Quelques points de repère

  • Conference paper
Cancer du sein

  • 274 Accesses

Abstrait

Qu’est-ce qu’une probabilité ? Comme souvent pour les concepts ambigus une double étymologie est retrouvée:

  • — celle d’approbation (probité) et

  • — celle de preuve (probationnaire).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eisinger F, Pierret J (1998) Le risque son évaluation et la maladie. In: INSERM/FNCLCC, éd. Risques héréditaires de cancers du sein et de l’ovaire. Quelle prise en charge ? Paris: INSERM; p. 7–17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Knight F (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan S, Garrick B (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis; 1: 11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haimes Y (1991) Total Risk Management. Risk Analysis; 11: 169–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothman K (1976) Causes. Am J Epidemiol; 104: 578–592

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med; 44: 681–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eeckhoudt L (1991) Théorie de la prévention. Risques 4: 19–25

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vernon SW (1999) Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review [see comments]. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25: 101–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G (2000) Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Anal 20: 713–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. National Research Council (1996) Understanding Risk–Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  11. Slovic P (1987) Perception of Risk. Science 236: 280–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischbeck PS, Farrow RS, Morgan MG (2001) Introduction: The Challenge of Improving Regulation. In: Paul S. Fischbeck, R. Scott Farrow, ed. Improving Regulation: Cases in Environment, Health, and Safety. Baltimore MA USA: RFF Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1992) Risk management as a postnormal science. Risk Anal 12: 95–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut Paoli-Calmettes, INSERM U379, 232, bd Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille

    F. Eisinger

Authors
  1. F. Eisinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eisinger, F. (2007). Le risque, son appréciation, sa gestion. Quelques points de repère. In: Cancer du sein. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71478-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71478-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-71477-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-71478-8

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation