Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Imagerie de la fonction sphinctérienne

  • Chapter
Les fonctions sphinctériennes

  • 376 Accesses

Abstrait

Apprécier la fonction sphinctérienne urinaire et anale en imagerie est difficile car, ďune part, ľanalyse morphologique du sphincter ne reflète pas systématiquement sa fonction, en particulier sur le plan urinaire, et, ďautre part, ľimagerie dynamique illustre un processus complexe où ľintervention de la fonction sphinctérienne n’est pas isolée.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Kuo HC (2000) The relationships of urethral and pelvic floor muscles and the urethral pressure measurements in women with stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 37: 149–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kondo Y, Homma Y, Takahashi S et al. (2001) Transvaginal ultrasound of urethral sphincter at the mid urethra in continent and incontinent women. J Urol 165: 149–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Umek WH, Laml T, Stutterecker D et al. (2002) The urethra during pelvic floor contraction: observations on three-dimensional ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 100: 796–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Athanasiou S, Khullar V, Boos K et al. (1999) Imaging the urethral sphincter with three-dimensional ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 94: 295–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beco J, Léonard D, Léonard F (1998) Study of the female urethra’s submucous vascular plexus by color Doppler. World J Urol 16: 224–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirshner-Hermanns R, Klein HM, Muller U et al. (1994) Intra-urethral ultrasound in women with stress incontinence. Brit J Urol 74: 315–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schaer GN, Schmid T, Pescheers U et al. (1998) Intraurethral ultrasound correlated with urethral histology. Obstet Gynecol 91: 60–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer JR, heit MH, Clark MH et al. (2000) Correlation of intraurethral ultrasonography and needle electromyography of the urethra. Obstet Gynecol 95: 156–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heit M (2000) Intraurethral ultrasonography: correlation of urethral anatomy with functional urodynamic parameters in stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J 11: 204–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson D, Toozs-Hobson P, Cardozo L, Digesu A (2004) Correlating structure and function: three-dimensional ultrasound of the urethral sphincter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23: 272–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Noble JG, Dixon PJ, Rickards D, Fowler CJ (1995) Urethral sphincter volumes in women with obstructed voiding and abnormal sphincter electromyographic activity. Brit J Urol 76: 741–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Siracusano S, Bertolotto M, Silvestre G et al. (2002) The feasibility of urethral color ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of female intrinsic sphincter deficiency: preliminary results. Spinal Cord 40: 192–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hricak H, Secaf E, Buckley DW et al. (1991) Female urethra: Magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 178: 527–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2001) Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 218: 621–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Macura KJ, Genadry R, Borman TL et al. (2004) Evaluation of the female urethra with intraurethral magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 20: 153–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Umek WH, Kearney R, Morgan DM et al. (2003) The axial location of structural regions in the urethra: A magnetic resonance study in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 102: 1039–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perucchini D, De Lancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA et al. (2002) Age effects on urethral striated muscle. II. Anatomic location of muscle loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186: 356–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DeLancey JOL (1994) Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: The hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170: 1713–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan IL, Stoker J, Zwamborn AWZ (1998) Female pelvic floor: Endovaginal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology 206: 777–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tunn R, De Lancey JOL, Quint EE (2001) Visibility of pelvic organ support system structures in magnetic resonance images without an endovaginal coil. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184: 1156–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lapray JF (1999) Imagerie de la vessie et de la dynamique pelvienne de la femme. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim HK, Kim JJ, Choo MS, Cho KS (2003) The urethra and its supporting structures in women with stress urinary incontinence: MR imaging using an endovaginal coil. AJR 180: 1037–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eguarre EI, Neary P, Crosbie J et al. (2004) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor in patients with idiopathic combined fecal and urinary incontinence. J Gastrointest Surg 8: 73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DeSousa NM, Daniels OJ, Williams AD et al. (2002) Female urinary genuine stress incontinence: anatomic considerations at MR imaging of the paravaginal fascia and urethra—initial observations. Radiology 225: 433–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McGuire EJ, Cespedes RD, Cross CA, O’Connell HE (1996) Videourodynamics studies. Urol Clin North Am 23: 309–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Artibani W, Andersen JT, Ostergard DR et al. (1998) Imaging and other investigations. In First international consulation on incontinence Monaco Abrams P, Khoury S, Wein A (eds). Graph’Imprim, Choisy le Roy, pp 401–45

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mostwin JL, Yang A, Sanders R et al. (1995) Radiography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging for stress incontinence. Urol Clin N Am 22: 539–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Versi E, Deirdre JL, Griffiths DJ (1998) Videourodynamic diagnosis of occult genuine stress incontinence in patients with anterior vaginal wall relaxation. J Soc Gynecol Invest 5: 327–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pelsang RE, Bonney WW (1996) Voiding cystourethrography in female stress incontinence AJR 166: 561–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lapray JF (2000) Imagerie de ľin suffisance sphinctérienne. In: Amarenco G, Serment G (eds). Ľinsuffisance sphinctérienne de la femme, Paris, Elsevier, pp 87–108

    Google Scholar 

  31. Blaivas JG, Olsson CA (1988) Stress incontinence: classification and surgical approach. J Urol 139: 727–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McGuire EJ (1981) Urodynamic findings in patients after failure of stress incontinence operations. Prog Clin Biol Res 78: 351–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Demirci F, Fine PM (1996) Ultrasonography in stress urinary incontinnence. Int Urogynecol J 7: 125–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dietz HP, Wilson PD (1999) The influence of bladder volume on the position and mobility of the urethrovesical junction. Int Urogynecol J 10: 3–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U (1996) Usefulness of ultrasound contrast medium in perineal sonography for vizualisation of bladder neck funneling — first observations. Urology 47: 452–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lieneman A, Anthuber C, Baron A et al. (1997) Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol 7: 1309–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DT, Hale DS, Benson JT (2000) Female pelvic organe prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR 174: 81–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I et al. (1998) Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology 206: 641–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dvorkin LS, Hetzer F, Scott SM et al. (2004) Open-Magnet MR defaecography compared with evacuation proctography in the diagnosis and management of patients with rectal intussuception. Colorectal Disease 6: 45–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Law P, Bartram C (1989) Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radiol 14: 349–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI (1990) A comparison between electromyography and anal endosonography in mapping external anal sphincter defects. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 370–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Buchmann P (1996) Anal sphincter defects in fecal incontinence: correlation between endosonography and surgery. Endoscopy 28: 217–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Frudinger A, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Kamm M (1998) Examination techniques for endosonography of the anal canal. Abdom Imaging 23: 301–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Hauge C et al. (1991) Endosonography of the anal sphincter: findings in healthy volunteers. AJR 157: 1199–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sultan A, Nicholls R, Kamm M (1992) Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Brit J Surg 80: 808–11

    Google Scholar 

  46. Oh C, Kark A (1972) Anatomy of the external anal sphincter. Brit J Surg 59: 717–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al. (1994) Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 49: 368–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kamm MA, Hoyle CH, Burleigh DE et al. (1991) Hereditary internal anal sphincter myopathy causing proctalgia fugax and constipation. A newly identified condition. Gastroenterology 100: 805–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Suarez L, Olivares F, Lobo E et al. (1999) Anal endosonography in children with chronic constipation. Pediatr Radiol 29: 28–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Talbot IC (1994) Progressive systemic sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter leading to passive faecal incontinence. Gut 35: 857–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Romano G, Rotondano G, Esposito P et al. (1996) External anal sphincter defects: correlation between pre-operative anal endosonography and intraoperative findings. Brit J Radiol 69: 6–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC et al. (1994) Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Brit J Surg 81: 463–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Frudinger A, Bartram CI, Spencer JA, Kamm MA (1997) Perineal examination as a predictor of underlying external anal sphincter damage. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 104: 1009–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Keating JP, Stewart PJ, Eyers AA et al. (1997) Are special investigations of value in the management of patients with fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 40(8): 896–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG et al. (1993) Anal sphincter defects. Correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery. Ann Surg 218: 201–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Sentovich SM, Wong WD, Blatchford GJ (1998) Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 1000–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Schroeder T, Fazio VW (1993) Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects. Dis Colon Rectum 36(7): 689–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Enck P von Giesen HJ, Schafer A et al. (1996) Comparison of anal sonography with conventional needle electromyography in the evaluation of anal sphincter defects. Am J Gastroenterol 91: 2539–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Gold DM, Halligan S, Kmiot WA, Bartram CI (1999) Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in anal endosonography. Brit J Surg 86: 371–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ (1995) Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Colorectal Dis 10: 152–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Damon H, Henry L, Barth X, Mion F (2002) Fecal incontinence in females with a past history of vaginal delivery: significance of anal sphincter defects detected by ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1445–50; discussion 1450–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gold DM, Bartram CI, Halligan S et al. (1999) Three-dimensional endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury. Brit J Surg 86: 365–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. deSouza NM, Puni R, Zbar A et al. (1996) MR imaging of the anal sphincter in multiparous women using an endoanal coil: correlation with in vitro anatomy and appearances in fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167: 1465–71

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ et al. (1999) Fecal incontinence: endoanal US versus endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 212: 453–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Malouf AJ, Williams AB, Halligan S et al. (2000) Prospective assessment of accuracy of endoanal MR imaging and endosonography in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175: 741–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Briel JW, Zimmerman DD, Stoker J et al. (2000) Relationship between sphincter morphology on endoanal MRI and histopathological aspects of the external anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 15: 87–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Briel JW, Stoker J, Rociu E et al. (1999) External anal sphincter atrophy on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging adversely affects continence after sphincteroplasty. Brit J Surg 86: 1322–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P (1984). Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Endosc 9: 247–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE et al. (1989). Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30: 1737–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Goei R, van Engelshoven J, Schouten H et al. (1989) Anorectal function: defecographic measurement in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 173: 137–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Rao SS, Welcher KD, Leistikow JS (1998) Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination. Am J Gastroenterol 93: 1042–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Halligan S, McGee S, Bartram C (1994) Quantification of evacuation proctography. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 1151–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Halligan S, Bartram CI, Park HJ, Kamm MA (1995) Proctographic features of anismus. Radiology 197: 679–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Karlbom U, Nilsson S, Pahlman L, Graf W (1999) Defecographic study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects. Radiology 210: 103–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Faucheron JL, Dubreuil A (2000) Rectal akinesia as a new cause of impaired defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1545–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Wald A, Caruana BJ, Freimanis MG et al. (1990) Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evaluation of adults with constipation and defecatory difficulty. Dig Dis Sci 35: 481–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Allen-Mersh TG, Turner MJ, Mann CV (1990) Effect of abdominal Ivalon rectopexy on bowel habit and rectal wall. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 550–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Vilotte J et al. (1993) How accurate is clinical examination in diagnosing and quantifying pelvirectal disorders? A prospective study in a group of 50 patients complaining of defecatory difficulties. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 430–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Barthet M, Portier F, Heyries L et al. (2000) Dynamic anal endosonography may challenge defecography for assessing dynamic anorectal disorders: results of a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 32: 300–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. J.-F. Lapray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Damon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lapray, JF., Damon, H. (2006). Imagerie de la fonction sphinctérienne. In: Les fonctions sphinctériennes. Collection de L’Académie Européenne de Médecine de Réadaptation. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-37362-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-37362-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-25167-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-37362-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation