Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pathologie du sphincter anal chez la femme pendant la grossesse et ľaccouchement

  • Chapter
Les fonctions sphinctériennes

Abstrait

Le comportement du sphincter anal pendant la grossesse ne diffère pas de son état non gravide

La grossesse induit chez un grand nombre de femmes une constipation que ľon peut qualifier de «physiologique» par augmentation de la réabsorption de ľeau au niveau du côlon. Elle n’en modifie pas pour autant le comportement de ľappareil sphinctérien anal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Bumm E (1914) Précis ďObstétrique en 28 leçcons, Lausanne, Librairie Payot et Cie

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tetzschner T, Sorensen M, Lose G, Christiansen J (1997) Pudendal nerve function during pregnancy and after delivery. Int Urogynecol J 8: 66–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tetzschner T, Sorensen M, Jonsson L et al. (1997) Delivery and pudendal nerve function. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 76: 324–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee SJ, Park JW (2000) Follow-up evaluation of the effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1550–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fynes M, Donnelly VS, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C (1998) Cesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury. Obstet Gynecol 92(4 Pt 1): 496–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark MH, Scott M, Vogt V, Benson JT (2001) Monitoring pudental nerve function during labor. Obstet Gynecol 97: 637–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rempen A, Kraus M (1991) Measurement of head compression during labor: Preliminary results. J Perinat Med 19: 115–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzpatrick M (2003) Patterns of abnormal pudendal nerve function that are associated with postpartum fecal incontinence. American Journal of Obstet Gynecol 189: 730–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gregory WT, Lou JS, Stuyvesant A, Clark AL (2004) Quantitative electromyography of the anal sphincter after uncomplicated vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 104: 327–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Podnar S, Lukanovicbrene A, Vodusek DB (2000) Anal sphincter electromyography after vaginal delivery: neuropathic insufficiency or normal wear and tear? Neurourol Urodynam 19: 249–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lien KC, Mooney B, De Lancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA (2004) Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 103: 31–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pregazzi R, Sartore A, Bortoli P et al. (2002) Immediate postpartum perineal examination as a predictor of puerperal pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 99: 581–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lienemann A, Fischer T, Anthuber C, Reiser M (2003) Functional MRI of the pelvic floor: postpartum changes of primiparous women after spontaneous vaginal delivery. Rofo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 175: 1100–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De Lancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q et al. (2003) The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 101: 46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al. (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. New Engla J Med 329: 1905–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abramowitz L, Sobhani I, Ganansia R et al. (2000) Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 590–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Faltin D, Boulvain M et al. (2000) Diagnosis of occult anal sphincter by post-partum endosonography to predict faecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 95: 643–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Damon H, Henry L, Bretones S et al. (2000) Postdelivery anal function in primiparous females: ultrasound and manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 472–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinta TM, Kylanpaa ML, Teramo KA, Luukhonen PS (2004) Sphincter rupture and anal incontinence after first vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 83: 917–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C (2003) Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG 110: 424–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hojberg KE, Hundborg HH, Ryhammer AM, Laurberg S (2003) The impact of delivery on anorectal function in women with and women without anal incontinence—a prospective study. Int Urogynecol J 14: 38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer S, Schreyer A, De Grandi P, Hohlfeld P (1998) The effects of birth on urinary continence mechanisms and other pelvic-floor characteristics. Obstet Gynecol 92(4 Pt 1): 613–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fitzpatrick M, Harkin R, McQuillan K et al. (2002) A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence. BJOG 109: 1359–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M (2002) Anal incontinence after childbirth. Canadian Med Assoc J 166: 326–30

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hudelist G, Gell’n J, Singer C et al. (2005) Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps, delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192: 875–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Janni W, Schiessl B, Peschers U et al. (2002) The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 81: 214–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wood J, Amos L, Rieger N (1998) Third degree anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome. Australian NZJ Obstet Gyn 38: 414–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O’Herlihy C (2001) Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 98: 1027–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Anzen B et al. (1999) Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome in primary repair. Obstet Gynecol 94: 21–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cosner KR (1996) Use of fundal pressure during second-stage labor. A pilot Study. J Nurse-Midwifery 41: 334–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. World Health Organization (1996) Maternal and newborn health/safe methorhood unit, family and reproductive health. Care in normal birth: A practical guide. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  32. Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Malinow AM (2002) The effect of fundal pressure manœuvre on intrauterine pressure in the second stage of labour. BJOG 109: 520–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Malinow AM et al. (2002) Pushing in labor: performance and not endurance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186: 1339–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Svenningsen L, Jensen O (1988) A method for objective measurement of fetal head compression during the second stage of labor. Gynecol Obstet Invest 26: 219–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Carroli G, Belizan J (2005) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. [Systematic Review] Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R et al. (2005) Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA 293: 2141–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G et al. (2004) The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 103: 669–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 108: 383–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Benifla JL, Abramowitz L, Sobhani I et al. (2000) Postpartum sphincter rupture and anal incontinence: prospective study with 259 patients. Gynecologie, Obstetrique_& Fertilite. 28: 15–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Baessler K, Schuessler B (2003) Childbirth-induced trauma to the urethral continence mechanism: review and recommendations. Urology 62(4 Suppl 1): 39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Christianson LM, Bovbjerg VE, McDavitt EC, Hullfish KL et al. (2003) Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189: 255–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Kimberger O et al. (2003) Management of the perineum during forceps, delivery. Association of episiotomy with the frequency and severity of perineal trauma in women undergoing forcep delivery. J Reprod Med 48: 239–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Johanson R, Menon V (2005) Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pesches UM, Sultan AH, Jundt K (2003) Urinary and anal incontinence after vacuum delivery. Eur J Obstet Gyn RB 110: 39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Meyers S, Holfeld P, Achtari C et al. (2000) Birth trauma: short and long term effects for forceps delivery compared with spontaneous delivery on various pelvic floor parameters. BJOG 107: 1360–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Wennerholm UB et al. (2000) Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors. BJOG 107: 926–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wood J, Amos L, Rieger N (1998) Third degree anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome. Australian_& NZJ Obstet Gyn 38: 414–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Johanson RB, Heycock E, Carter J et al. (1999) Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. Br J Obstet Gynaec 106: 544–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Parnell C, Langhoff-Roos J, Moller H (2001) Conduct of labor and rupture of the sphincter ani. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 80: 256–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Pirhonen JP, Grenman SE, Haadem K et al. (1998) Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland—result of difference in manual help to the baby’s head. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 77: 974–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Elfaghi I, Johansson-Ernste B, Rydhstroem H (2004) Rupture of the sphincter ani: the recurrence rate in second delivery. BJOG 111: 1361–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Faltin DL, Sangalli MR, Roche B et al. (2001) Does a second delivery increase the risk of anal incontinence? BJOG 108: 684–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sze EH (2005) Prevalance and severity of anal incontinence in women with and without additional vaginal deliveries after a fourth-degree perineal laceration. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 66–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Spydslaug A, Trogstad LI, Skrondal A, Eskild A (2005) Recurrent risk of anal sphincter laceration among women with vaginal deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 105: 307–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D et al. (1998) Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 92: 955–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Rieger N, Schloithe A, Saccone G, Wattchow D (1998) A prospective study of anal sphincter injury due to childbirth. [Journal Article] Scand J Gastroentero 33: 950–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Williams AB, Bartram CI, Halligan S et al. (2002) Alteration of anal sphincter morphology following vaginal delivery revealed by multiplanar anal endosonography. [Journal Article] BJOG 109: 942–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD (2003) Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 90: 1333–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Willis S, Faridi A, Schelzig S et al (2002) Childbirth and incontinence: a prospective study on anal sphincter morphology and function before and early after vaginal delivery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387: 101–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Fornell EU, Matthiesen L, Sjodahl R, Berg G (2005) Obstetric and sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects. BJOG 112: 312–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cornella JL, Hibner M, Fenner DE et al. (2003) Three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images of the anal sphincter and correlation between sphincter volume and pressure. [Journal Article] Am J Obstet Gynecol 189: 130–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sultan AH (1999) Editorial: obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clinical Risk 5: 193–6

    Google Scholar 

  63. Dupuis O, Madelenat P, Rudigoz RC (2004) Fecal and urinary incontinence after delivery: risk factors and prevention. Gynecologie, Obstetrique_& Fertilite 32: 540–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Williams A, Adams EJ, Bolderson J et al. (2003) Effect of a new guideline on outcome following third-degree perineal tears: results of a 3-year audit. Int Urogynecol J 14: 385–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Incontinence, 2nd international consultation on incontinence, July, 1–3, 2001, 2nd edition 2002, ed Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, Estever Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sangalli MR, Floris L, Faltin D, Weil A (2000) Anal incontinence in women with third or fourth degree perineal tears and subsequent vaginal deliveries. Australian NZJ Obstet Gyn 40: 244–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O’Connel PR, O’Herlihy C (2000) A randomized clinical trial comparing primary overlap with approximation repair of third-degree obstetric tears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183: 1220–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Blackstone J (2004) Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review. Obstetrical_& Gynecological Survey 59: 601–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. S. Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Achtari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyer, S., Achtari, C. (2006). Pathologie du sphincter anal chez la femme pendant la grossesse et ľaccouchement. In: Les fonctions sphinctériennes. Collection de L’Académie Européenne de Médecine de Réadaptation. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-37362-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-37362-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-25167-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-37362-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation