Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cancer canalaire in situ (CCIS)

  • Chapter
Le cancer du sein

Part of the book series: Oncologie pratique ((ONCOLPRAT))

  • 532 Accesses

Abstrait

Le carcinome canalaire in situ (CCIS) correspond à une prolifération cellulaire maligne développée à ľintérieur des canaux galactophoriques et/ou des terminaisons ductolobulaires du sein. La lésion n’atteint pas la membrane basale et il n’y a donc pas de risque de dissémination ganglionnaire ou hématogène.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Schwartz GF, Solin LJ, Olivotto IA et al. (2000) Consensus Conference on the treatment of in situ Ductal Carcinoma of the breast, April 22–25, 1999. Cancer 88: 946–954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Martino S et al. (1998) Outcome after invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast J Clin Oncol 16: 1367–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marty M, Rossignol C, Serruys C et al. (1992) Le cancer du sein au moment du diagnostic. Étude nationale de la CANAM: analyse de 3007 cas. Press Med 21: 1017–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Léonard G, Swain SM (2004) Ductal carcinoma in situ: complexities and challenges J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 906–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baxter NN, Virnig BA, Durham JB, Tuttle TM (2004) Trend in treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 443–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cutuli B, Fourquet A, Luporsi E, et al. Standards, Options et Recommandations 2004. Prise en charge des carcinomes canalaires in situ du sein.www.fnclcc.fr

    Google Scholar 

  7. Claus EB, Stowe M, Carter D (2001) Breast carcinoma in situ: risk factors and screening patterns. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 1811–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cutuli B, Lemanski C, Fourquet A et al. (2005) French National Survey on DCIS: analysis of clinico-pathological features and treatments in 1289 patients. Eur J Cancer (Suppl. 3/2): 77: (abs 274)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barreau B, de Mascarel I, Feuga C et al. (2005) Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations. Eur J Radiol, 54: 55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrow M, Strom E, Basset LW et al. (2002) Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer J Clin 52: 256–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutgers EJ for the EUSOMA Consensus Group et al. (2001) Quality control in the locoregional treatment of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 37: 447–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyages J, Delaney G, Taylor R (1999) Predictors of local recurrence after treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. A meta-analysis. Cancer, 85: 616–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lagios MD (2002) The Lagios experience. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast (2nd ed.); Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 303–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schwartz GF (2002) Treatment of subclinical ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by local excision and surveillance: an updated personal experience. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast 2d Edition; Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds), Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 308–21

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arnesson LG, Olsen K. (1997) Linköping experience. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast. Silverstein MJ (ed.), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 373–7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cutuli B, Fay R, Cohen-Solal-Le Nir C et al. (2004) Carcinome canalaire in situ du sein. Analyse de 882 cas. Presse Med 33: 83–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wong JS, Kaelin CM, Troyan SL (2006) Prospective study of wide excision alone for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Oncol 24: 1031–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fowble B (2002) Overview of conservative surgery and radiation therapy ductal carcinoma in situ. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast (2nd ed.); Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 287–302

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher B, Land S, Mamounas E et al. (2001) Prevention of invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: an update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. Semin Oncol 28: 400–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bijker N, Peterse JL, Duchateau L et al. (2001) Risk factor for recurrence and metastasis after breast conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10853. J Clin Oncol 19: 2263–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bijker N, Meijnen PH, Bogaerts J, Peterse JL (2006) Radiotherapy in breast conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Ten year results of European Organization for research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized trial 10853. J Clin Oncol 24: 3381–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. UK Coordinating committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR) Ductal Carcinoma in situ Working Party (2003) Radiotherapy and Tamoxifen in women with completely excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 362: 95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Emdin S, Granstrand B, Ringberg A et al. (2006) SweDCIS: radiotherapy after sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Results of a randomised trial in a population offered mammographic screening. Acta Oncologica 45: 536–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cuzick J (2003) Treatment of DCIS. Results from clinical trials. Surgical Oncol 12: 213–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Recht A (2002) Salvage of local-regional failure. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast (2nd ed.); Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 539–44

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cutuli B, Lemanski C, Le Blanc M et al. (2002) Local recurences after DCIS therapy: diagnosis treatment and outcome. Breast cancer Res Treat 76: (suppl 1): S36–31

    Google Scholar 

  27. Warren JL, Weaver DL, Bocklage T et al. (2005) The frequency of ipsilateral second tumors after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS: population based analysis. Cancer 104: 1840–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vicini FA, Recht A (2002) Age at diagnosis and outcome for women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a critical review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 20: 2736–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Solin LJ, Fourquet A, Vicini F et al. (2001) Mammographically detected Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 50: 991–1102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Solin L, Fourquet A, Vicini F et al. (2005) Long-term outcome after breast conservation treatment with radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 1003: 1137–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I et al. (2003) Characteristics associated with recurrence among women ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 1692–702

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S et al. (1999) The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med, 340: 1455–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mac Donald HR, Silverstein MJ, Mabry H et al. (2005) Local control in ductal carcinoma in situ treated by excision alone: incremental benefit of larger margins. Am J Surg 190: 521–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sigal-Zafrani B, Lewis JS, Clough KB et al. (2004) Histological margin assessment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ: precision and implications. Mod Pathol 17: 81–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kell MR, Morrow M (2005) An adequate margin of excision in ductal carcinoma in situ. BMJ 331: 789–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tabar L, Gad A, Parson WC, Neeland DB (2002) Mammographic Appearances of in situ carcinomas. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast (2nd ed.); Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia p 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  37. Silverstein MJ (2002) The Van Nuys/USC Experience by treatment. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast (2nd ed.); Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia p 337–42

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Golstein NS et al. (2000) Impact of young age on outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 18: 296–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N et al. (2000) Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 353: 1993–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fisher B, Land S, Mamounas E et al. (2002) Prevention of invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: an update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Experience. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast (2nd ed.); Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 432–46

    Google Scholar 

  41. Allred DC (2002) Biologic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast (2nd ed.); Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 37–48

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yen TW, Hunt K, Mirza NO et al. (2004) Physician recommendations regarding Tamoxifen and patient utilisation of Tamoxifen after surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 100: 942–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wai ES, Solin L, Fourquet A et al. (2004) Salvage treatment for local recurence after breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation as initial treatment for mammographically-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 60: (suppl 1) S133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Claus EB, Stowe M, Carter D, Holford T (2003) The risk of contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. The Breast 12: 451–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kricker A, Goumas C, Amstrong B (2004) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. A population-based study of epidemiology and pathology. Br J Cancer 90: 1382–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Solin LJ (2006) Is excision alone adequate treatment for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast? J Clin Oncol 24: 1017–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Poller DN, Silverstein MJ (2002) The Van Nuys Ductal Carcinoma in Situ classification: an update. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast (2nd ed.); Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 222–33

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yiangou C, Jeffrey J (2002) Problems with the use of the Van Nuys prognostic index. In: Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the breast (2nd ed.); Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios M (eds) Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 474–81

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mac Master KM, Chao C, Wong SL et al. (2002) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. A proposal Cancer 95: 15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield M et al. (2004) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendation for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23: 7703–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ceilley E, Jagsi R, Goldberg S et al. (2004) The management of ductal carcinoma in situ in North America and Europe. Results of a survey. Cancer 101: 1958–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mokbel K, Cutuli B (2006) Heterogeneity of ductal carcinoma in situ and its effects on management. Lancet oncology 7: 756–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Polyclinique de Courlancy, 51100, Reims

    B. Cutuli

Authors
  1. B. Cutuli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cutuli, B. (2007). Cancer canalaire in situ (CCIS). In: Le cancer du sein. Oncologie pratique. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-36073-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-36073-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-36071-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-36073-2

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation