Advertisement

The Hygrometer and Other Meteorological Instruments

  • H. Howard Frisinger
Part of the Meteorological Monographs book series (METEOR)

Abstract

As was noted in Chapter I, the ancient Greeks had a fairly accurate grasp of the hydrological cycle—the ascent of water from the lakes, rivers, and oceans into the atmosphere, and its return again to the earth as precipitation. One problem with this cyclic concept was that at some stage in the process the water became invisible. To resolve this difficulty, Aristotle and other Greek natural philosophers assumed that some, but not all, of the ascending water turned into air.1 The reason for the “hedge” on not having all of the rising water turning into air was that Aristotle realized that clouds consisted of drops of water.2

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aristotle, Meteorologica, Trans. H.D.P. Lee (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1952), pp. 73–74.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., p. 71.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    René Descartes, “Les Météores,” Discours de la Methodechrw(133) (Paris: Charles Angot, 1668), pp. 227–230.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For a translation of the pertinent paragraphs of this work, see James R. Newman, ed., The World of Mathematics, 4 Vols., (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1956), 2: 774–777.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.E. Knowles Middleton. Invention of the Meteorological Instruments (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1969), p. 82. For a more thorough discussion of the developing theories concerned with water vapor. see W.E.K. Middleton, A History of the Theories of Rain (London: 1965), especially Chapters 1, 2, and 7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harvey A. Zinszer, “Meteorological Milepost,” Scientific Monthly 58 (1944): 261.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Florian Cajori, A History of Physics (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1906), p. 48.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A picture of this instrument, along with a discussion of it, appeared in the work: Joachim d’Alencé, Curieux traité de mathematigue, ou par le moyen de trois instruments, a sauvoir, du barometre,chrw(133) (Paris: 1713), pp. 117–120.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Middleton, Invention of the Meteorological Instruments, p. 86.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    There is some evidence to indicate that A. Mizaldus observed this property as early as 1554; see G. J. Symons, “A Contribution to the History of Hygrometers,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 7 (1881): 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robert Hooke, Micrographia (London: Martyn and Allestry, 1665), pp. 147–152.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Middleton, Invention, pp. 86–88.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friedrich Lowenhaupt, “Johann Heinrich Lambert als Naturforscher,” Johann Heinrich Lambert: Leistung und Leben (Mulhausen: Braun & Co., 1943), p. 35.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G.J. Symons, “A Contribution to the History of Hygrometers,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 7 (1881): 162.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johann H. Lambert, “Suit de L’Essai d’Hygrometrie,” Nouveaux Mémoires de L’Académie Royal Des Sciences (Berlin, 1772): 65–102.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibid., p. 75.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Wolf, A History of Science, Technology, and Philosophy in the 18th Century (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1939), p. 335.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Symons, op. cit., p. 166. This type of hygrometer was first suggested by Guillaume Amontons in 1687. See W.E.K. Middleton, Invention of the Meteorological Instruments, pp. 48–99.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolf, op. cit., p. 334.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Horace B. De Saussure, Essais sur l’Hygrométrie (Neuchatel: 1783).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wolf, op. cit., p. 327.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    For a discussion of this debate, see Middleton, Invention of the Meteorological Instruments, pp. 103–110.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Middleton, Invention, p. 110.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Charles Le Roy, Mém. Acad. Roy. des Sci. Paris (1751), pp. 481–518.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ibid., p. 490.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Symons, op. cit. p. 166.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    William Cullen, “An Essay on the Cold produced by Evaporating Fluids, and of some other means of producing Cold,” Edinburgh Philosophical and Literary Essays II (1755): 159–171.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Middleton, Invention, p. 122.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wolf, op. cit., p. 341.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Symons, op. cit., p. 170.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Middleton, Invention, pp. 126–128.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Symons, op. cit., p. 181.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Geoffrey Reynolds, “A History of Rain Gauges,” Weather 20 (April, 1965): 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    For the related passage in this work Arthastra, see Josindra Nath Sammadar notes in Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 38 (1912): 65–66.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Middleton, Invention, p. 134.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ibid., pp. 134–135.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Castelli is sometimes credited with the invention of the rain gauge; see L. Dufour, “Les grandes époques de l’histoire de la météorologie,” Ciel et Terre 59 (1943): 358.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Galileo, Opere, ed. nuz., 20 vols., (Florence: 1890–1909), 18:62–66.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ibid., p. 62.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    G.J. Symons, “A Contribution to the History of Rain Gauges,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 18 (1891): 128.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Richard Townley, Phil. Trans. 18 (1694): 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Middleton, Invention, p. 137.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. Wolf, A History of Science, Technology, and Philosophy in the 16th and 17th Centuries (London: Allen & Unwin, 1935), p. 310.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
    The common means of measuring the rainfall at this time was by weighing it, i.e., the Gresham College Rain Gauge.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    See the short note by Horsley in Phil. Trans. 32 (1723): 328–329.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    The rotational anemometer was a product of the nineteenth century; for a discussion of the development of the rain gauge and atmometer in the nineteenth century, see Middleton, Invention, pp. 141–174, 212–224.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Middleton, Invention, p. 182.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Leon Battista Alberti. Opuscoli moralichrw(133) tradottichrw(133) da cosimo Bartoli (Venice, 1568), p. 253.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ivor B. Hart, The Mechanical Inventions of Leonardo da Vinci (London: 1925), pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    J. Oliver, “An Early Self-Recording Pressure-Plate Anemometer,” Weather 12 (1957): 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Middleton, Invention, pp. 182–183.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    J.K. Laughton, “Historical Sketch of Anemometry and Anemometers,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 8 (1882): 162–164.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    S. Santorre, Sanctorii Sanctorii lustinopolitanichrw(133) commentaria in primam fen priori libri canonic Auicennaechrw(133), (Venice: 1625), Col., pp. 245–245.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    P. Bouguer, Traité du navire, de sa construction, et de ses mouvemens (Paris: 1746), pp. 359–360.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    One reason for the great interest in the wind’s pressure was that, especially for sailors, the pressure of the wind was considered its most important property.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Middleton, Invention, pp. 191–193.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    James Lind, Phil. Trans. 65 (1775): 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    See Middleton, Invention, pp. 196–201.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    The “Tower of the Winds” contained a crude form of a wind vane on its top.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Middleton, Invention, pp. 248–250.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    R.T. Gunther, Early Science in Oxford, (London: Dawsons of Pall Mall, 1967), 7: 519–523.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Meteorological Society 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Howard Frisinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Colorado State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations