Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Meteorological Monographs ((METEOR))

  • 92 Accesses

Abstract

For 2,000 years after Aristotle, there was very little progress in meteorology. Considerable efforts were devoted to atmospheric optics, but most of the scant attention given to meteorology consisted of commentaries on Aristotle’s treatise. Most of his distinguished successors added little to the perfection of his system. There were a few, however, who did expand on his theories, especially in those areas to which he had paid slight attention. One was his pupil, Theophrastus of Eresos, who wrote “De Signis Tempestatum” (On Weather Signs) and a treatise, “De Vends,” on winds. The practice of weather prognostication by empirical rules dates from these treatises. Theophrastus gives some eighty different signs of rain, forty-five of wind, fifty of storm, twenty-four of fair weather, and seven signs of weather for periods of a year or less. In looking at the overall weather picture, Theophrastus advocates a general principle:1

Now the first point to be seized is that the various periods are all divided in half, so that one’s study of the year the month or the day should take account of those divisions. The year is divided in half by the setting and rising of the Pleiad; for from the setting to the rising is a half year. So that to begin with the whole period is divided into halves: and a like division is effected by the solstices and equinoxes. From which it follows that, whatever is the condition of the atmosphere when the Pleiad sets, that it continues in general to be till the winter solstice, and, if it does change, the change only takes place after the solstice: while, if it does not change it continues the same till the spring equinox: the same principle holds good from that time to the rising of the Pleiad, from that again to the summer solstice, from that to the setting of the Pleiad.

So too is it with each month; the full moon and the eighth and the fourth days make divisions into halves, so that one should make the new moon the starting point of one’s survey. A change most often takes place on the fourth day, or, failing that, on the eighth, or, failing that, at the full moon; after that the periods are from the full moon to the eighth day from the end of the month, from that to the fourth day from the end, and from that to the new moon.

The divisions of the day follow in general, the same principle: there is the sunrise, the mid-morning, noon, mid-afternoon, and sunset; and the corresponding divisions of the night have like effects in the matter of wind storms and fair weather; that is to say, if there is to be a change, it will generally occur at one of these divisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 36.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Theophrastus, Enquiry into Plants and Minor Works on Odours and Weather Signs, trans. Sir Arthur Hort (London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1948), 2: 395.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Proclus, The Commentaries of Proclus on the Timaeus of Plato, trans. Thomas Taylor (London: the author, 1820), pp. 100–102.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For example, see J.I. Craig, “Meteorological Conditions Controlling the Nile Flood,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 35 (1909): 141–143

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.W. Bliss, “The Nile Flood and World Weather,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 53 (1927) 41–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Secundus Plinius, Pliny: Natural History, trans. H. Rackham (London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1938), 1: 229.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Claudius Ptolemaeus, Ptolemy’s Tetrabibles, trans. F.E. Robbins (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1940), p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.K. Heninger, Jr., A Handbook of Renaissance Meteorology (Durham: Duke University Press, 1960), p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Julius Hann, Handbuch Der Klimatologie (Stuttgart: Verlag Von J. Engelhorm, 1883), p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a full account of the Tower of the Winds, see Stuart and Revett, Antiquities of Athens (London, 1972). Also see Thompson, D’Arcy, “The Greek Winds,” Classical Review 32 (1918): 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sir William Napier Shaw, Manual of Meteorology (Cambridge: The University Press, 1926) 1: 81.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Seneca, Quaestiones Naturales, trans. John Clarke (London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Plinius, op. cit., pp. 245–289.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cicely M. Botley, “A Founder of English Meteorology,” Quart. Jour. of the Roy. Meteor. Soc. 61 (1935): 346.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Venerabilis Bede, The Complete Works of Venerable Bede: In the Original Latin, ed. J.A. Giles (London: Whittaker and Co., 1843), Vol. VI.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a discussion of Isidore’s role in medieval science, see Floyd S. Lear, “St. Isidore and Medieval Science,” The Rice Institute Pamphlet 33 (1936): 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heninger, op. cit., p. 721.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Dufour, “Les grandes époques de l’histoire de la météorologia,” Ciel et Terre 59 (1943): 357.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sarton, op. cit., p. 721.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alhazen, Opticae Thesaurus, ed. Federico Risnero, Basileae, per Episcopios (1572), pp. 286–287.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 288.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carl B. Boyer, A History of Mathematics (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1968), pp. 276–277.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adelard of Bath, “Quaestiones Naturales,” Dodi Ve Nechdi (Uncle and Nephew), trans. Hermann Gollancy (London: Oxford University Press, 1920), pp. 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  26. For a historical discussion of the theories on the cause of thunder and lightning, see H. Howard Frisinger, “Early Theories on the Cause of Thunder and Lightning,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 46, No. 12 (1965): 785–787.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Adelard of Bath, op. cit., p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A.C. Crombie. Augustine to Galileo-The History of Science (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953), p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dufour, op. cit., p. 357.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sir Oliver Lodge, Pioneers of Science (New York: Dover, 1960), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roger Bacon, The Opus Majus of Roger Bacon, trans. Robert B. Binke (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1928), 1: 116.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid., p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid., p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid., pp. 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid., p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See Curt F. Buhler, “Sixteenth-Century Prognostications,” Isis 33 (1941–42): 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Leonard Digges, A Prognostication of Right Good Effect (London: 1555).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lynn Thorndike, A History of Magic and Experimental Science (New York: Columbia University Press, 1934), 3: 416–417.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Robert Recorde, The Castle of Knowledge (London: 1556), pp. 6,64,91

    Google Scholar 

  40. John Dee, De nubium, solis, lunae ac reliquorum planetarum, imo, ipsius stelliferi coeli, ab intimo terrae centro distantus mutuisqui intervallic et eorundem omnium magnitudine (London: 1551). This is a work on clouds.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Girolamo Cardano, De Subtilitate, 3rd ed. (Basel: 1569).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid., p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., p. 396.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Charles Singer, A Short History of Scientific Ideas to 1900 (London: Oxford University Press, 1959), p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  45. For a discussion of “Les Météores,” see F. Wootton, “The Physical Works of Descartes,” Science Progress 21 (1927): 457–478.

    Google Scholar 

  46. To see how Descartes applied his method in the natural sciences, see Hyman Stock, The Method of Descartes in the Natural Sciences (New York: The Marion Press, 1931).

    Google Scholar 

  47. René Descartes, Discours De le Méthodchrw(133) (Paris: Charles Angot, 1668), pp. 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., pp. 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid., pp. 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Etienne H. Gilson, “Météores cartesians et météores scholastiques,” Études de Philosophie Mediévale (Paris: J. Vrin, 1921): 247–286.

    Google Scholar 

  51. In this connection, see Rufus Suter, “Science Without Experiment: A Study of Descartes,” Scientific Monthly 58 (1944): 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Carl B. Boyer, The Rainbow (New York: Thomas Yoseloff, 1959), p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Wolf, A History of Science Technology, and Philosophy in the 16th and 17th Centuries, 2nd ed. (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1950), p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 American Meteorological Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frisinger, H.H. (1983). The Dark Before the Dawn. In: The History of Meteorology: to 1800. Meteorological Monographs. American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-940033-91-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-940033-91-4_3

  • Publisher Name: American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-940033-91-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics