Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wetlands and Sustainable Drainage

  • Chapter
Book cover Wetland Systems

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

While Chapter 2 focused on wetland systems for pollution control, this chapter concentrates on the combination of wetlands with sustainable drainage and flood control technology and planning. Particularly large retention basins, detention tanks, and alternative concepts for sustainable drainage are assessed. Section 4.1 introduces a rapid assessment methodology for the survey of water bodies including large wetland systems such as sustainable flood retention basins (SFRB). This novel and timely SFRB concept is funded and promoted by the European Union. Moreover, Section 4.2 provides a classification example for different Scottish SFRB, highlighting the dominance of current and former potable water supply reservoirs. Section 4.3 summarizes a new sustainable (urban) drainage system (SUDS); i.e., a combined wetland and detention system. This SUDS technique could be combined with SFRB. Finally, Section 4.4 introduces the novel concept of integrating trees into SUDS design. The section shows that trees have the potential to reduce runoff volumes via retention, evapotranspiration, and interception, highlighting missed opportunities in traditional drainage design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Forests (2005) Various documents. www.americanforests.org. Accessed 20 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DM, Gilbert PM, Burkholder JM (2002) Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries 25:704–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ATV–DVWK (2001) Hochwasserrückhaltebecken – Probleme und Anforderungen aus wasserwirtschaftlicher und ökologischer Sicht. Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwaser und Abfall eV (ATV–DVWK), Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Abwassertechnik eV, Hennef, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Bah AR, Kravchuk O, Kirchhof G (2009) Sensitivity of drainage to rainfall, vegetation and soil characteristics. Comput Electron Agric 68:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayley SE, Guimond JK (2008) Effects of river connectivity on marsh vegetation community structure and species richness in montane floodplain wetlands in Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada. Ecoscience 15:377–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanpain O, Karnib A, Al-Hajjar J (2004) A decision making tool providing aid in choosing a storm drainage network solution: description and analysis. Urban Wat J 2004:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brion GM, Lingireddy S (2003) Artificial neural network modeling: a summary of successful applications relative to microbial water quality. Wat Sci Technol 47:235–240

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstert A, Baardossy A, Bismuth C, Buiteveld H, Disse M, Engel H, Fritsch U, Hundecha Y, Lammersen R, Niehoff D, Ritter N (2007) Multi-scale modeling of land-use change and river training effects on floods in the Rhine basin. River Res Appl 23:1102–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RB (2003) Soil texture. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/SS169. Accessed 30 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulc T, Slak AS (2003) Performance of constructed wetland for highway runoff treatment. Wat Sci Technol 48:315–322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Davis JW (2000) Urban drainage. E&FN Spon, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Parkinson J (1997) Towards sustainable urban drainage. Wat Sci Technol 35:53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Friedler E, Gatt K (1995) Characterising the quantity and quality of domestic wastewater inflows. Wat Sci Technol 31:13–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casali J, Gimenez R, De Santisteban L, Alvarez-Mozos J, Mena J, Del Valle de Lersundi J (2009) Determination of long-term erosion rates in vineyards of Navarre (Spain) using botanical benchmarks. Catena 78:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung EG, Bombardelli FA, Geoffrey Schladow S (2009) Modeling linkages between sediment resuspension and water quality in a shallow, eutrophic, wind-exposed lake. Ecol Model 220:1251–1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CEH (1999) Flood estimation handbook. Institute of Hydrology, CEH Wallingford, England, UK. http://www.nwl.ac.uk/ih/feh/html/handbook.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRIA (2004) The SUDS manual (C697). Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA), London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRIA (2005) Sustainable drainage systems: promoting good practice. Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA). www.ciria.org/suds. Accessed 20 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • CMHC (2005) Various documents. www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/imquaf/himu/wacon/wacon_027.cfm, example document. Accessed 25 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Colin F, Puech C, de Marsily G (2000) Relations between triazine flux, catchment topography and distance between maize fields and the drainage network. J Hydrol 236:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins AL, Walling DE (2007) The storage and provenance of fine sediment on the channel bed of two contrasting lowland permeable catchments, UK. Riv Res Appl 23:429–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CUFR (2005) Trees reduce storm water runoff. Center for Urban Forest Research (CUFR). www.cufr.ucdavis.edu/research/water.asp. Accessed 20 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson JJC, Soulsby C, Tetzlaff D, Hrachowitz M, Dunn SM, Malcolm IA (2008) Influence of hydrology and seasonality on DOC exports from three contrasting upland catchments. Biogeochemistry 90:93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T, Leopold LB (1978) Water in environmental planning. Freeman, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • EDINA (2009) Digimap and Historic Digimap Collections. http//edina.ed.ac.uk. Accessed 10 Jan 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AC, Withers PJA (2008) Transport and delivery of suspended solids, nitrogen and phosphorus from various sources to freshwaters in the UK. J Hydrol 350:144–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EEC (1991) EEC urban waste water treatment. Directive 91/271/EEC 1991, European Economic Community, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis B (1991) Urban runoff quality in the UK – problems, prospects and procedures. Appl Geogr 11:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis CD, Lee S-W, Kweon B-S (2006) Retail land use, neighbourhood satisfaction and the urban forest: an investigation into the moderating and mediating effects of trees and shrubs. Landsc Urban Plann 74:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency (2009) http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/research/planning/33240.aspx. Accessed 1 Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2007) The quality of drinking water in the European Union synthesis report on the quality of drinking water in the European Union period 2002–2004. Directives 80/778/EEC and 98/83/EC. http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/drinking_water_rev/library?l=/drinking_synthesis/report_2002-2004pdf/_EN_1.0_&a=d. Accessed 2 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Everding SE, Jones DN (2006) Communal roosting in a suburban population of Torresian crows (Corvus orru). Landsc Urban Plann 74:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger JR (2003) Is all your rain going down the drain? Research summary in Center for Urban Forest Research, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerasimo IP (1969) Revision of genetic principles of Dokuchayevs soil science in new American classification of soils and in works on compilation of world soil map. Soviet Soil Sci – USSR 5:511

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervin L, Brix H (2001) Removal of nutrients from combined sewer overflows and lake water in a vertical-flow constructed wetland system. Wat Sci Technol 44:171–176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow Council (2005) City of parks and gardens. www.glasgow.gov.uk/en/AboutGlasgow/ Touristattractions/cityofparksandgardens.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • GPS (2009) Magellan Geographical Positioning System (GPS) receivers. http://www.gps-maps.us/magellan-gps-receivers.shtml. Accessed 20 Nov 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamed MM, Khalafallah MG, Hassanian EH (2004) Prediction of wastewater treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks. Environ Model Softw 19:919–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He LM, He ZL (2008) Water quality prediction of marine recreational beaches receiving watershed baseflow and stormwater runoff in southern California, USA. Wat Res 42:2563–2573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heal KAV (2001) Manganese and land-use in upland catchments in Scotland. Sci Total Environ 265:169–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • House A (2009) River basin district. http://www.euwfd.com/html/river_basin_districts.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC 2007. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2000) Vision for water and nature. A world strategy for conservation and sustainable management of water resources in the 21st century. Compilation of all project documents. Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar SS, Kashyap RL (1989) Autonomous intelligent machines. Computer June:14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeng HC, England AJ, Bradford HB (2005) Indicator organisms associated with storm water suspended particles and estuarine sediment. J Environ Sci Health 40:779–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B, Balserak P, Beaulieu S, Cuthbertson B, Stewart R, Truesdale R, Whitmore R, Young J (2003) Industrial surface impoundments: environmental settings, release and exposure potential and risk characterization. Sci Total Environ 317(1–3): 1–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L, Rousseeuw, PJ (1990) Finding groups in data – an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay D, Wyer M, Crowther J, Stapleton C, Bradford M, McDonald A, Greaves J, Francis C, Watkins J (2005) Predicting faecal indicator fluxes using digital land use data in the UK’s sentinel Water Framework Directive catchment: the Ribble study. Wat Res 39:3967–3981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi Yazdi S, Scholz M (2010) Assessing storm water detention systems treating road runoff with an artificial neural network. Wat Air Soil Pollut 206:35–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick M (1988) The Thames barrier. Landsc Urban Plann 16:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchelmeister G, Braatz S (1993) Urban forestry revisited. Unasylva J Forestry 173:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn G, Diekmann B (2003) Data report: bulk sediment composition, grain-size, clay, and silt mineralogy of Pleistocene sediments from ODP Leg 177 Sites 1089 and 1090. Proc ODP Sci Results 177:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Larinier M (2000) Dams and Fish Migration. World Commission on Dams. FAO Fisheries Technical paper, 419:45–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee B-H, Scholz M (2006) A comparative study: prediction of constructed treatment wetland performance with K-nearest neighbours and neural networks. Wat Air Soil Pollut 174:279–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loures L, Panagopoulos T (2007) From Derelict Industrial Areas towards Multifunctional Landscapes and Urban Renaissance. WSEAS Trans Environ Develop 3(10):181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader G, Neubert-Mader L (2004) Bäume – Gestaltungsmittel in Garten, Landschaft und Städtebau. Komet, Cologne, Germany (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (1996) The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters. Wat Resour Res 32:1013–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (1998) The effect of internal parameters and geometry on the performance of back propagation neural networks: an empirical study. Environ Model Softw 13:193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issues and applications. Environ Model Softw 15:101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas DML, Ahlfeld DP (2007) Comparing artificial neural networks and regression models for predicting faecal coliform concentrations. Hydrol Sci J 52:713–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCorquodale JA, Georgiou I, Carnelos S, Englande AJ (2004) Modeling coliforms in storm water plumes. J Environ Eng Sci 3:419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLemore VT (1988) Chicosa Lake State Park. New Mexico Geol 10(3):62–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Memon FA, Butler D (2002) Assessment of gully pot management strategies for runoff quality control using a dynamic model. Sci Total Environ 295:115–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Met Office (2005) Climate. Meteorological Office of the United Kingdom (Met Office). www.metoffice.co.uk. Accessed 20 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Minitab Inc. (2003) Minitab Statistical Software, Release 14 for Windows. State College, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell GN (1991) Water quality issues in the British uplands. Appl Geogr 11(3):201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty S, Scholz M, Slater MJ (2002) Neural network simulation of the chemical oxygen demand reduction in a biological activated carbon filter. J Ch Inst Wat Environ Manag 16:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohssen M (2008) An insight into flood frequency for design floods. Flood Recovery Innovat Response 118:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montaldo N, Mancini M, Rosso R (2004) Flood hydrograph attenuation induced by a reservoir system: analysis with a distributed rainfall-runoff model. Hydrol Process 18(3):543–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss B (1988) Ecology of Freshwaters; Man and Medium, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelakantan TR, Brion GM, Lingireddy S (2001) Neural network modeling of Cryptosporidium and Giardia concentrations in the Delaware River, USA. Wat Sci Technol 43:125–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet TR, Welch D, Doughty R (2002) The role of forest management in controlling diffuse pollution from the afforestation and clear felling of two public water supply catchments in Argyll, West Scotland. For Ecol Manag 158(1–3):141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2004) Indicators for waterborne pathogens. National Research Council of the National Academies (NRC), National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe B, D’Arcy BJ, Barbarito B, Clelland B (2005) Urban diffuse sources of faecal indicators. Wat Sci Technol 51:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Olding DD, Steele TS, Nemeth JC (2004) Operational monitoring of urban stormwater management facilities and receiving subwatersheds in Richmond Hill, Ontario. Wat Qual Res J Can 39:392–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver YM, Lefroy EC, Stirzaker R, Davies CL (2005) Deep-drainage control and yield: the trade-off between trees and crops in agroforestry systems in the medium to low rainfall areas of Australia. Austr J Agric Res 56:1011–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit S, Duhme F (2000) Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning, Landsc Urban Plann 52:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratap R (2002) Getting Started with MATLAB: A Quick Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramchunder SJ, Brown LE, Holden J (2009) Environmental effects of drainage, drain-blocking and prescribed vegetation burning in UK upland peatlands. Prog Phys Geogr 33(1):49–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Scharron CE, MacDonald LH (2007) Measurement and prediction of natural and anthropogenic sediment sources, St John, US Virgin Islands. Catena 71(2):250–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers LL, Dowla FU (1994) Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling. Wat Resour Res 30:457–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu N, Finch R (1996) Emulation of DWRDSM using artificial neural networks and estimation of Sacramento River flow from salinity. In: Proceedings of the North American water and environment conference, ASCE, New York, pp. 4335–4340

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarle W (2002) The neural network FAQ. ftp://ftp.sas.com/pub/neural/FAQ4.html. Accessed Nov 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M (2006a) Wetland systems to control urban runoff. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M (2006b) Practical sustainable urban drainage system decision support tools. Proc Inst Civ Eng Eng Sustain 159:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M (2007a) Classification methodology for sustainable flood retention basins. Landsc Urban Plann 81(3):246–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M (2007b) An expert classification system for sustainable flood retention basins. Civ Eng Environ Syst 24(3):193–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M (2007c) Ecological effects of water retention in the River Rhine Valley: a review assisting future retention basin classification. Int J Environ Stud 64:171–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M, Sadowski AJ (2009) Conceptual classification model for sustainable flood retention basins. J Environ Manag 90(1):624–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M, Morgan R, Picher A (2005) Storm water resources development and management in Glasgow: two case studies. Int J Environ Stud 62:263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekliziotis S (1980) A survey of urban open space using colour-infrared aerial photographs. PhD thesis, University of Aston, Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • SEPA (2007) Scotland’s WFD aquatic monitoring strategy, Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), Stirling, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher BA (2002) Methods for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) in soils and sediments. Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd TJ, Chenery SRN, Pashley V, Lord RA, Ander LE, Breward N, Hobbs SF, Horstwood M, Klinck BA, Worrall F (2009) Regional lead isotope study of a polluted river catchment: River Wear, Northern England, UK. Sci Total Environ 407(17):4882–4893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (2009) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Recently re-branded as Predictive Analytics SoftWare (PASW). http://www.spss.com/uk/statistics/?gclid=CNvH2-XFuZsCFY4U4wodMkPQEA. Accessed 1 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens CJ, Quinton JN (2009) Diffuse pollution swapping in arable agricultural systems. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39(6):478–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stovin VR, Jorgensen A, Clayden A, Swan A (2005) Urban trees and stormwater management – an undervalued resource? In: Third National Conference on Sustainable Drainage. Incorporating 27th Meeting of Standing Conference on Stormwater Source Control, 20–21 June 2005, Coventry University, pp. 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Alliance for Water Management Actions (2009) SAWA – A Strategic Alliance in the North Sea Region. Strategic Alliance for Water Management Actions (SAWA) project information. http://www.sawa-project.eu/. Accessed 1 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Struve J, Westen S, Millard K, Fortune D (2002) State of the art review. HR Wallingford Report Number EVK1-CT-2001-00090-SR 598

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (2006) Ecological census techniques – a handbook, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi M, Higaki A, Nohno M, Kamada M, Okamura Y, Matsui K, Kitani S, Morikawa H (2005) Differential assimilation of nitrogen dioxide by 70 taxa of roadside trees at an urban pollution level. Chemosphere 61:633–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomenko V, Ahmed S, Popov V (2007) Modeling constructed wetland treatment system performance. Ecol Model 205:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Groundwater Forum (2009) Groundwater basics. http://www.groundwateruk.org/What-is-Groundwater.aspx. Accessed 10 Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukonmaanaho L, Nieminen TM, Rausch N, Cheburkin A, Le Roux G, Shotyk W (2006) Recent organic matter accumulation in relation to some climatic factors in ombrotrophic peat bogs near heavy metal emission sources in Finland. Glob Planet Change 53(4):259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzin MC, McIntosh AW (1999) Aquatic ecosystems in agricultural landscapes: a review of ecological indicators and achievable ecological outcomes. J Soil Wat Conserv 54(4):636–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu JS, Ahlert RC (1978) Assessment of methods for computing storm runoff loads. J Am Wat Resour Assoc 14:429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Yu SL, Zou R (2006) A water quality based approach for watershed wide BMP strategies. J Am Wat Resour Assoc 42:1193–1204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Q, McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Ustin SL (1998) Rainfall interception by Sacramento’s urban forest. J Arboric 24:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Patuwo BE, Hu MY (1998) Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the state of the art. Int J Forecast 14:35–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, van Dijk MA, Liu M, Zhu G, Qin B (2009) The contribution of phytoplankton degradation to chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in eutrophic shallow lakes: field and experimental evidence. Wat Res 43:4685–4697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Nanbakhsh H, Scholz M (2006) Case study: design and operation of sustainable urban infiltration ponds treating storm runoff. J Urban Plann Develop Am Soc Civ Eng 132:36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurada JM (1992) Introduction to artificial neural systems. West Publishing, St Paul, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Discipline of Civil Engineering, School of Computing, Science and Engineering, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, M5 4WT, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK

    Miklas Scholz

Authors
  1. Miklas Scholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scholz, M. (2011). Wetlands and Sustainable Drainage. In: Wetland Systems. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-459-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-459-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-458-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-459-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation