Surgical fixation of distal tibia fractures can be difficult, and requires careful preoperative planning. Fracture pattern, soft tissue injury, and bone quality critically influence the selection of fixation technique.1 Several surgical methods have been described for the treatment of these fractures, including external fixation, intramedullary nailing, and plate fixation. Classical open reduction and internal plate fixation requires extensive soft tissue dissection and periosteal stripping, with high rates of complications, including infection, delayed and non-unions.2,3 Moreover, the surgical dissection required to achieve anatomic reduction evacuates the osteogenic fracture ematoma. Several minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis techniques have been developed, with good results at medium term follow-up.4–6 These techniques aim to reduce surgical trauma and to maintain a more biologically favorable environment for fracture healing.
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Bedi A, Le TT, Karunakar MA. Surgical treatment of nonarticular distal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:406–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fisher WD, Hamblen DL. Problems and pitfalls of compression fixation of long bone fractures: a review of results and complications. Injury. 1978;10:99–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olerud S, Karlstrom G. Tibial fractures treated by AO compression osteosynthesis. Experiences from a five year material. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1972;140:1–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Francois J, Vandeputte G, Verheyden F, Nelen G. Percutaneous plate fixation of fractures of the distal tibia. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70:148–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Helfet DL, Shonnard PY, Levine D, Borrelli J Jr. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia. Injury. 1997;28:A42–A47, discussion A7–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffulli N, Toms AD, McMurtie A, Oliva F. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Int Orthop. 2004;28:159–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenboehler E, Rikli D, Babst R. Locking compression plate with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal and distal tibial fracture: a retrospective study of 32 patients. Injury. 2007;38:365–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazarika S, Chakravarthy J, Cooper J. Minimally invasive locking plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the distal tibia--results in 20 patients. Injury. 2006;37:877–887.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau TW, Leung F, Chan CF, Chow SP. Wound complication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop. 2007;32:697–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronga M, Longo UG, Maffulli N. Minimally invasive locked plating of distal tibia fractures is safe and effective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0991-7.Google Scholar
Tull F, Borrelli J Jr. Soft-tissue injury associated with closed fractures: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:431–438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, Candal-Couto J, Green S, Hui AC. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability? Injury. 2007;38:358–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintermann B, Regazzoni P, Lampert C, Stutz G, Gachter A. Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:345–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imade S, Takao M, Nishi H, Uchio Y. Arthroscopy-assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation for triplane fracture of the distal tibia. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:e123–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loren GJ, Ferkel RD. Arthroscopic assessment of occult intra-articular injury in acute ankle fractures. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:412–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gachter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury. 2003;34:B11–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar