Skip to main content

Challenge 1: Placing Climate Actions in a Wider Sustainable Development Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges and Solutions for Climate Change

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 1517 Accesses

Abstract

Recent studies have shown an increasing urgency to address climate change and its impacts on ecosystems with the scale of action requiring no less than ‘a green revolution.’ A review of the climate negotiations and recent developments within the Cancun Agreements identifies five main challenges to progress. In this first chapter, the need for increased engagement of developing countries in global climate coalitions for action is discussed. It has become clear that climate policy making and sustainable development policies are increasingly becoming interlinked, especially in developing countries, where climatic changes affect achieving development goals and where climate action could improve energy access with low greenhouse gas emitting technologies for poverty alleviation. The challenge is to place the climate negotiations in this wider context of sustainability, equity and social change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, the Cancun Agreements acknowledge that the target of 2°C may not be sufficient and is notional. Recent calculations indicate that “if global GHG emissions are halved by 2050 relative to 1990, there is still a 12–45% estimated probability of exceeding 2°C—assuming a range of published climate sensitivity distributions. Emission levels in 2020 are a less robust indicator, but for the scenarios considered, the probability of exceeding 2°C rises to 53–87% if global GHG emissions are still more than 25% above 2000 levels in 2020” (Meinhausen et al. 2009).

  2. 2.

    http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/misc/carbontrends.htm. Accessed 28 May 2011.

  3. 3.

    These figures do not contain GHG emissions in the areas of land use, land-use change and forestry.

  4. 4.

    The official name of the meeting was: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). It was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on 3–14 June 1992. http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html. Accessed 27 August 2011.

  5. 5.

    http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?menu=17

  6. 6.

    Note that in Practical Action (2010), energy access is considered for a range of services: lighting, cooking and water heating, space heating, cooling, information and communications and earning a living.

  7. 7.

    http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?menu=17

  8. 8.

    INC was established on 21 December 1990 by the UN General Assembly (Resolution 45/212). It was scheduled that INC would deliver a draft Convention text that would be ready for signature at the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May–June 1992).

  9. 9.

    This became known under the UNFCCC as the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities.

  10. 10.

    The COP itself was established under the UNFCCC in Article 7 as the supreme body of the Convention with, among others, the task to periodically examine the obligations of the Parties. The first COP in 1995 could only be organised after the entry-into-force of the UNFCCC on 21 March 1994, 90 days after deposit of the 50th instrument of ratification (Portugal, 21 December 1993).

  11. 11.

    It must be noted that the Kyoto Protocol eventually contained various aspects that the US delegation had introduced in the negotiations, such as the decision that industrialised countries could fulfil their commitments flexibly, i.e., by spreading compliance across a five-year commitment period, by focusing on six GHGs instead of the initial focus on CO2, and through emissions trading.

  12. 12.

    For example, because of the concessions, Japan’s required emission reduction dropped from 6% less than 1990 levels to a 1% reduction, while Canada could let its GHG emissions increase by 5% (Benedick 2001).

  13. 13.

    After enough industrialised countries had ratified the Kyoto Protocol so that it represented at least 55% of the total GHG emissions of industrialised countries in 1990.

  14. 14.

    COP 15 and fifth meeting of Kyoto Protocol Parties (COP–MOP).

  15. 15.

    Non-Annex I refers to the countries that were not included in the UNFCCC Annexes of Parties with GHG emission stabilisation targets. In practice, the term non-Annex I Parties mainly refers to developing countries.

  16. 16.

    The terms low-carbon and low-emission development strategies are used interchangeably in literature sources. In this book, we use the term low-emission development strategies as this indicates more clearly that the focus is on mitigation of a range of greenhouse gases instead of just carbon or carbon dioxide.

  17. 17.

    For example, the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate, launched in March 2009 to facilitate a dialogue on energy and climate change among larger developed and developing country economies, contains the following countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the EU, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Russian Federation, South Africa, USA, and UK.

  18. 18.

    In the context of climate change policy, Barrett (1997 and 2000) identified two aspects of trade leakage. First, countries with emission reduction commitments would switch from carbon-intensive fossil fuels to fuels with lower carbon content or to renewable energy sources. Because of the lower demand for fossil fuels in these countries, fossil fuel prices will go down, which could create an incentive for countries without commitments to increase their demand for fossil fuels. The GHG emission reduction achieved because of the commitments would thus be offset by increased emissions elsewhere. Second, Barrett (1997 and 2000) and Schreuder (2009) argue that trade leakage can occur if companies decide to shift their production from countries with commitments to countries without commitments.

  19. 19.

    Adaptation measures can focus on reduced impacts of climate change on health and social systems and on sectors such as agriculture, biodiversity and ecosystems, production systems, and physical infrastructure, including the energy grid.

  20. 20.

    See for further information: http://tech-action.org/. Accessed 19 September 2011.

References

  • ACCO (2011). Cancun de-brief: Reflections on COP -16 in cancun and implications for U.S. Businesses. Webcast organized by the association of climate change officers (ACCO) on 9 February 2011. Retrieved February 9, 2011 from http://www.accoonline.org/event_archives.html#Cancun De-brief: Reflections on COP-16 in cancun and implications for U.S. Businesses.

  • AGECC (2010). Energy for a sustainable future. The Secretary-General’s Advisory Group on energy and climate change (AGECC). Summary report and recommendations, 28 April 2010, New York, USA. Retrieved September 23, 2011 from http://www.un.org/wcm/webdav/site/climatechange/shared/Documents/AGECC%20summary%20report[1].pdf.

  • Anderson, S. (2011). Climate change and poverty reduction. Climate & Development Knowledge Network (CDKN). Policy Brief, August 2011. Retrieved August 9, 2011 from http://cdkn.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/CDKN_poverty-reduction_FINAL.pdf.

  • Arts, B. (1998). The political influence of global NGOs. Case studies on the climate and biodiversity conventions. Utrecht, The Netherlands. International Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (1997). The strategy of trade sanctions in international environmental agreements. Resource and Energy Economics, 19, 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (2000). Trade and environment: Local versus multilateral reforms. Environment and Development Economics, 5, 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (2005). Environment and Statecraft, the strategy of environmental treaty making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedick, R. E. (2001). Striking a new deal on climate change. Issues in Science and Technology, 18(1), 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Project (2011). Preliminary Findings. Retrieved April, 26 2012 from http://berkeleyearth.org/findings.

  • Clapp, C., Briner, G., & Karousakis, K. (2010). Low-emission development strategies (LEDS): Technical, Institutional and policy lessons. Paris: OECD, IEA. Retrieved September 23, 2011 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/58/46553489.pdf.

  • Den Elzen, M., & Höhne, N. (2008). Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets. Climatic Change, 91, 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depledge, J., & Yamin, F. (2009). The global climate-change regime: A defence. In D. Helm, C. Hepburn, (Eds.), The economics and politics of climate change (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011). A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. *COM/2011/0112 final*/. Retrieved September 22, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/documentation/roadmap/index_en.htm

  • Falkner, R., Stephan, H., & Vogler, J. (2010). International climate policy after Copenhagen: Towards a ‘building blocks’ approach. Global Policy, 1(3), 252–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueres, C. (2011). Statement by Christiana Figueres at the high-level inter-parliamentary debate on climate change. Brussels, Belgium, 19 April 2011. Retrieved September 17, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/files/press/statements/application/pdf/110419_speech_inter-parliament_brussels.pdf

  • Fletcher, S. R. (1997). Global climate change treaty: summary of the Kyoto Protocol. Congressional research service report for congress. 98–2 ENR. The National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, A. (2006). An inconvenient truth: The planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it. Emmaus, Pennsylvania, USA: Rodale Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gros, D., & Egenhofer, C. (2010). Climate change and trade: Taxing carbon at the border? CEPS Paperback. Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved August 18, 2011 from http://www.ceps.eu/system/files/article/2009/08/Climate%20Change%20and%20Trade.pdf

  • Grubb, M. (1990). The greenhouse effect: Negotiating targets. International Affairs, 66,(1), 67–89 (Royal Institute of international Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, M., & Patterson, M. (1992). The international politics of climate change. International Affairs, 68, 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (2008). Climate change governance after Bali. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höhne, N., Hare, B., Schaeffer, M., Chen, C., Vieweg, M., & Moltmann, S. (2011). Emissions and CO 2 concentrations at record highs: Developed countries ambitions stalled while developing countries gearing up to act. Climate Action Tracker Update, 16 June 2011. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.climateactiontracker.org/CAT_update_Bonn_2011-06-16.pdf

  • IARU. (2009). Climate change: Global risks, challenges and decisions. International alliance of Research Universities. Retrieved April 29, 2011 from http://www.climatecongress.ku.dk/

  • IEA (2009). World energy outlook 2008. International Energy Agency. Paris: OECD/IEA. Retrieved May 28, 2011 from http://www.iea.org/weo/

  • IEA (2011). World Energy Outlook 2011. International Energy Agency. Paris: OECD/IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1995). Climate change 1995: Synthesis report contribution of working groups I, II and III to the second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved May 27, 2011 from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/climate-changes-1995/ipcc-2nd-assessment/2nd-assessment-en.pdf

  • IPCC (2000). Methodological and technological issues in technology transfer—a special report of IPCC working group III. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved September 21, 2011 from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/spm/srtt-en.pdf

  • IPCC (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. In R. K. Pachauri & A. Reisinger (Eds.), Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet (1st ed.). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • JIQ (2009). Uncertainty remains after Copenhagen. Joint Implementation Quarterly, 15(4), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, M. T. J., Lüdeke, M. K. B., Sterzel, T., Lucas, P. L., Walter, C., Janssen, P., & De Soysa, I. (2010). Quantitative analysis of patterns of vulnerability to global environmental change, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Den Haag/Bilthoven, the Netherlands. Retrieved September 10, 2011 from http://www.pbl.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/550025005.pdf

  • LDC Expert Group (2009). National adaptation programmes of action: Overview of preparation, design of implementation strategies and submission of revised project list and profiles. UNFCCC. Retrieved September 10, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/ldc_tp2009.pdf

  • Meinhausen, M., Meinhausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., et al. (2009). Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 458, 1158–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir Russell (2010). The Independent Climate Change E-Mails Review. Retrieved April 26, 2012 from http://www.cce-review/pdf/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf.

  • New, M., Liverman, D., Schroder, H., & Anderson, K. (2011). Four degrees and beyond: The potential for a global temperature increase of four degrees and its implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 369, 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Practical Action (2010). Poor people’s energy outlook 2010. Rugby, UK. Retrieved September 15, 2011 from http://practicalaction.org/ppeo2010

  • Prins, G., & Rayner, S. (2007). The wrong trousers: Radically rethinking climate policy. Joint discussion paper of the James Martin Institute for Science and Civilization, Oxford, University of Oxford, and the MacKinder Centre for the Study of Long-wave events, London, London School of Economies and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Catalyst (2009). Low carbon growth plans: Advancing good practice. Working draft 7 August 2009. ClimateWorks and European Climate Foundation. Retrieved September 23, 2011 from http://www.project-catalyst.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8&Itemid=12

  • Project Catalyst (2010). Taking stock—the emission levels implied by the pledges to the Copenhagen Accord. European Climate Foundation and ClimateWorks Foundation Briefing paper, February 2010. Retrieved September 22, 2011 from http://www.climateworks.org/download/?id=e63a5561-cff7-4213-9ebf-19297be70623

  • Reinstein, R. A. (2004). A possible way forward on climate change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 9, 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. (2010). Losing control: Global security in the 21st century (3rd ed.). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, Y. (2009). The corporate greenhouse: Climate change policy in a globalizing world. London: Zed Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavins, R. N. (2009). A portfolio of domestic commitments: Implementing common but differentiating responsibilities. Harvard: Harvard project on international climate agreements viewpoints.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2009). Action and ambition for a global deal in Copenhagen. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment policy paper, December 2009. Retrieved September 22, 2011 from http://www.unep.org/pdf/climatechange/actionandambitionforglobaldealincopenhagen.pdf

  • Stern, N., & Taylor, C. (2010). What do the appendices to the Copenhagen accord tell us about global greenhouse gas emissions and the prospects for avoiding a rise in global average temperature of more than 2°C? Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment policy paper, March 2010. Retrieved September 22, 2011 from http://www.unep.org/PDF/PressReleases/Accord_targets_paper.pdf

  • UN (1992). UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992). Retrieved September 5, 2011 from http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html

  • UNDP (2010). Handbook for conducting technology needs assessment for climate change. Retrieved September 23, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/ttclear/pdf/TNA%20HANDBOOK%20EN%2020101115.pdf

  • UNEP (2010). The emissions gap report: Are the Copenhagen Accord pledges sufficient to limit global warming to 2°C or 1.5°C?—A preliminary assessment. Retrieved September 23, 2011 from http://www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/emissionsgapreport/pdfs/EMISSION_GAP_REPORT_%20HIGHRES.pdf

  • UNFCCC (no date). GHG data from UNFCCC. Retrieved July 16, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/ghg_data_unfccc/items/4146.php

  • UNFCCC (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change, FCCC/INFORMAL/84. Retrieved May 23, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf

  • UNFCCC (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved May 23, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf

  • UNFCCC (2008a). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1. Retrieved July 17, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf#page=3

  • UNFCCC (2008b). Development and transfer of technologies. Decision 2/CP.14, FCCC/CP/2008/7/Add.1. Retrieved September 21, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/cop14/eng/07a01.pdf#page=3

  • UNFCCC (2009). Ideas and proposals on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan. Submissions from parties, part II, FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/MISC.4 (Part II), 19 May 2009. Retrieved September 23, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/awglca6/eng/misc04p01.pdf

  • UNFCCC (2010). The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. Decision 1/CP.16. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1. Retrieved July 17, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf#page=2

  • UNFCCC (2011a). Enhancing the implementation of the results of TNAs. Background paper II for UNFCCC workshop on technology needs assessments, Bonn, Germany, 1–2 June 2011. Retrieved June 3, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/ttclear/pdf/Workshops/Bonn%202011/BG%20paper%20II-implementing%20TNAs.pdf

  • UNFCCC (2011b). Interlinkages between technology needs assessments and national and international climate policy making processes. Background paper III for UNFCCC workshop on technology needs assessments, Bonn, Germany, 1–2 June 2011. Retrieved June 3, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/ttclear/pdf/Workshops/Bonn%202011/Background%20Paper%20III%2025%20May%20Final.pdf

  • UNFCCC (2012). Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011, Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its seventeenth session, FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1. Retrieved April 26, 2012 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf

  • UNFCCC-SBI (2011). National greenhouse gas inventory data for the period 1990–2009. Report on national greenhouse gas inventory data from Parties included in Annex I to the Convention for the period 1990–2009, FCCC/SBI/2011/9. Retrieved December 10, 2011 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/sbi/eng/09.pdf

  • Victor, D. G. (2006). Toward effective international cooperation on climate change: Numbers, interests and institutions. Global Environmental Politics, 6(3), 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D. G. (2007). Fragmented carbon markets and reluctant nations: Implications for the design of effective architectures. In J. Aldy & R. N. Stavins (Eds.), Architectures for agreement: Addressing global climate change in the post-Kyoto world, chapter 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009). Low-carbon growth studies—Getting started. Experience from six countries. Retrieved September 23, 2011 from http://www.esmap.org/esmap/node/362

  • WMO (1979). Proceedings of the world climate conference: A conference of experts on climate and mankind. Geneva, 12–32 February 1979. WMO-No. 537. ISBN 92-63-10537-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (1986). Report of the international conference on the assessment of the role of carbon dioxide and of other greenhouse gases in climate variations and associated impacts, Villach, Austria, 9–15 October 1985, WMO No.661.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Gaast, W., Begg, K. (2012). Challenge 1: Placing Climate Actions in a Wider Sustainable Development Context. In: Challenges and Solutions for Climate Change. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-399-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-399-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-398-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-399-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics