Skip to main content

Stakeholder Involvement and Team Working in Systems Development Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reframing Humans in Information Systems Development

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

It is a given that information Systems (IS) play a central role in the construction, adaptation and renewal of an organizations IS infrastructure (Beynon-Davies and Williams 2003). Hence, system development approaches are of significant importance to organizations considering or implementing IS development or business process reengineering. A considerable number of software system developments these days are large and complex in structure, and incorporate the concept of computer-supported co-operative work (CSCW). Grudin (1991) believes that CSCW has become significantly important since its introduction in 1984 by Paul Cashman and Irene Greif, and indeed, that collaborative computing is already affecting us because it changes the ways in which we work. Resultant changes reflect how people now-a-days work in team settings and supported by a range of technology. For example people may work in small teams but they form part of larger work environments within an organization where interfaces and systems have to accommodate multi-stakeholder communities despite conflicting goals (Grudin 1991). This has created formidable challenges for developers who need to fully comprehend organizational activity in order to design collaborative business processes to respond to the dynamic environments. Furthermore, the collaborative work processes relevant to the diversity of stakeholders involved are positioned in relation to an organizations structure, culture and policies together with the existing technologies. As a consequence integrated enterprise systems and collaborative computing have emerged to accommodate the current rapidly changing, distributed and global business environments (Hevner et al. 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agile-Alliance (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://www.agilealliance.org/ Accessed 25 January 2007.

  • Alvesson, M. (2003). “Beyond Neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research,” Academy of Management Review 28(1), 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison D.E., Wood-Harper, A.T., Vidgen, R.T., & Wood J.R.G. (1998). A further exploration into information systems development: The evolution of Multiview2. Information Technology & People, 11(2), 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. E., & Fitzgerald, G. (2006). Information systems development: methodologies, techniques and tools. 4th Edn. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J., & Hailey, V.H. (2004). Exploring strategic change, 2nd edn. Herefordshire, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, S., & Highsmith, J. (1994). RADical Software Development, American Programmer Magazine, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P. (1998). Rapid Applications Development (RAD). Briefing Paper. Kane Thompson Centre, University of Glamorgan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P. (2002) Information Systems An introduction to Informatics in Organisations. Hants: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P. & Williams, M.D. (2003). The diffusion of information systems development methods. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boan, D.M. (2006). Cognitive-behaviour modification and organizational culture. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(1), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B. (2002). Get ready for Agile methods with care. IEEE. doi: 0018-9162/02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel, E., Whitaker R.D., & George, J.F. (1993). PD and Joint Application Design: a transatlantic comparison. Communications of the ACM. 36(4), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffey, D., & Wood, S. (2005). Business information management – improving performance using information systems, Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2002). In good company: how social capital makes organizations work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, A. (2002). Agile software development. Boston, USA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté, S. The Contribution of Human and Social Capital, (2001). ISUMA – Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, J., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Effective communications in requirements elicitation: a comparison of methodologies. Requirements Engineering, 7(2), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DSDM Consortium (2004). Dynamic systems development method. http://www.dsdm.org/version4/2/public/ Accessed 25 April 2005.

  • Fischer, G., Grudin, J., & Lemke, A. (1992). Supporting indirect collaborative design with integrated knowledge-based design environments. Human–Computer Interaction, 7, 281–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, B. (1997). An empirical investigation into the adoption of systems development methodologies. Information & Management, 34, 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N.L., & Stolterman, E. (2002). Information Systems Development: Methods in Action. London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J., & Johnson, P. (1991). Research Methods for Managers. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, USA: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1991). CSCW Introduction. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 30–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-Sellers, B., Hawryszkiewycz, I. (2008). Comparing collaborative and process semantics for cooperative information systems. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 17(2), 155–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A.R. March, S.T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highsmith, J. (2000). Retiring Lifecycles Dinosaurs, Software Testing & Quality Engineering, July/August, 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highsmith, J. (2008). Agile software development ecosystems. London, UK: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2003). Cultures and organisations – software of the mind. London, UK: Profile Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, I. Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. (1999). The unified software development process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U. (1998) Computer-aided qualitative data analysis. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirova, K., Kirby, N., Kothari, D., & Childress, G. (2008). Effective requirements traceability: models, tools and practices. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 12(4), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luna-Reyes, L. F., Zhang, J., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Cresswell, A.M. (2005). Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1987). Information systems failures: a survey and classification of empirical literature. Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, 4, 257–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, S., Kautz, K., & Vidgen, R. (2006). A framework for understanding how a unique and local IS development method emerges in practice. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, G., & Poltrock, S. (2004). Groupware adoption in a distributed organization: transporting and transforming technology through social worlds. Information and Organization, 14(4), 297–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiassen, L. (1997). Reflective systems development. Aalborg University, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, S. (1996). Rapid development – taming wild software schedules. Washington, DC: Microsoft Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Imaginization: New mindsets for seeing, organizing and managing. San Francisco, USA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M.D. (1999). Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research, Communications of the AIS, 2(23), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company, Harvard Business Review, 69, 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J., & Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organisations. The Institute of Management Sciences, 2, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffers, K. Tuunanen, T. Rothenberger, M.A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekkola, S., Kaarilahti. N., & Pohjola, P. (2006). Towards formalised end-user participation in IS development process: bridging the gap between participatory design and ISD methodologies. Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference, ACM Press, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poltrock, S.E., & Engelbeck, G. (1999). Requirements for a virtual collocation environment. Information and Software Technology, 41, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santosa, P. I., Wei K. K., & Chan H. C. (2005). User involvement and user satisfaction with information-seeking activity. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile software development with SCRUM. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2005). Doing Qualitative Research. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J, (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research – Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truex, D., Baskerville, R., & Travis, J. (2000). Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods. Accounting Management & Information Technologies, 10(1), 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, E. (1983). Individuals and organisations: the cultural match. Training and Development Journal, February, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1997). Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, L., & Mason, D. (1987). Computerised work: people, systems design and workplace relations. London, UK: Paradigm Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th edn. CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilary Berger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berger, H. (2010). Stakeholder Involvement and Team Working in Systems Development Practice. In: Isomäki, H., Pekkola, S. (eds) Reframing Humans in Information Systems Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-347-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-347-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-346-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-347-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics