Skip to main content

Reliability-associated Cost Assessment and Management Decisions for Multi-state Systems

  • Chapter
  • 1891 Accesses

Abstract

Reliability is an important factor in the management, planning, and design of any engineering product. Today, in the global economy and due to various market pressures, the procurement decisions for many products are not based only on initial purchasing costs, but on their total life cycle costs (LCCs) (Dhillon 2000). Any important decision such as reliability allocation, spare parts storage, operation modes, etc. is based on total life cycle cost. Total LCC analysis should include all types of costs associated with a system’s life cycle. The main part of these costs for repairable systems is operation and maintenance costs. In order to repair a system we must buy corresponding spare parts, so we must pay money for spare parts purchasing. We also must allocate for spare parts storage and pay the repair team to repair the system. In addition, there are financial losses when a system interrupts its work because of failure and so on. All these costs together are usually significantly greater than the cost of purchasing a system. Below these costs will be called reliability associated costs (RACs). In order to perform effective life cycle cost analysis RACs should be accurately assessed. The reliability engineer performing such an assessment should have a basic knowledge and cooperate with specialists in many areas (including engineering design, finance and accounting, statistical analysis, reliability and maintainability engineering, logistics, and contracting). Creating the methods for correct evaluation of RACs is one of the main problems of practical reliability engineering. This problem is partially solved only for binary-state systems. Unfortunately, for MSSs almost every individual practical case requires carrying on special research and very few research works have been devoted to this problem till now. As a result, managers often do not even recognize the problem’s existence. Therefore, there is a significant contradiction between the great theoretical achievements of reliability theory and their relatively rare successful applications in practice for MSSs.

In this chapter we present the history of LCC analysis, its principles, and corresponding standards. It will be shown that RAC is really a main part of LCC for the majority of repairable systems. The methods described in the previous chapters will be applied below in order to assess RAC for MSSs for some methodologically important cases. Based on this, the corresponding optimal management practices are established. It is shown that significant amount of money may be saved as a result of correct reliability management of MSS’s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dhillon BS (2000) Design reliability: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldner Sh (2006) Markov model for a typical 360 MW coal fired generation unit. Commun Depend Qual Manag 9(1):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo W, Prasad VR (2000) An annotated overview of system reliability optimization. IEEE Trans Reliab 49(2): 487–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo W, Zuo M (2003) Optimal Reliability Modeling Principles and Applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin G (2005) Universal generating function in reliability analysis and optimization. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski A, Levitin G (2003) Multi-state system reliability: assessment, optimization and applications. World Scientific, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski A, Frenkel I, Khvatskin L, Ding Y (2008) Multistate system reliability assessment by using the Markov reward model. In: Vonta F, Nikulin M, Limnios N, Huber-Carol C (eds) Stochastic models and methods for biomedical and technical systems. Birkhauser, Boston: pp 153–168

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Logistics Management Institute (LMI) (1965) Life cycle costing in equipment procurement, Report No. LMI Task 4C–5, LMI, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • MIL–HDBK–338B (1998). Electronic reliability design handbook. US Department of Defense, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan W (1978) Procurement views of life cycle costing. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Reliability, pp 164–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushakov I (1987) Optimal standby problem and a universal generating function. Sov J Comput Syst Sci 25:61–73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2010). Reliability-associated Cost Assessment and Management Decisions for Multi-state Systems. In: Multi-state System Reliability Analysis and Optimization for Engineers and Industrial Managers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-320-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-320-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-319-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-320-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics