Skip to main content

Abstract

In recent years a specific approach called the universal generating function (UGF) technique has been widely applied to MSS reliability analysis. The UGF technique allows one to find the entire MSS performance distribution based on the performance distributions of its elements using algebraic procedures. This technique (sometimes also called the method of generalized generating sequences) (Gnedenko and Ushakov 1996) generalizes the technique that is based on a well-known ordinary generating function. The basic ideas of the method were primarily introduced by I. Ushakov in the mid 1980s (Ushakov 1986, 1987). Then the method was described in a book by Reinshke and Ushakov (1988), where one chapter was devoted to UGF. (Unfortunately, this book was published only in German and Russian and so remained unknown for English speakers.) Wide application of the method to MSS reliability analysis began in the mid-1990s, when the first application was reported (Lisnianski et al. 1994) and two corresponding papers (Lisnianski et al. 1996; Levitin et al. 1998) were published. Since then, the method has been considerably expanded in numerous research papers and in the books by Lisnianski and Levitin (2003), and Levitin (2005).

Here we present the mathematical fundamentals of the method and illustrate the theory by corresponding examples in order to provide readers with a basic knowledge that is necessary for understanding the next chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aven T (1993) On performance measures for multistate monotone systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 41(3):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow R., Prochan F (1974). Importance of system components and fault tree analysis, Operation Research Center, vol. 3, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow R., Prochan F (1975). Importance of system components and fault tree analysis. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 3(2):153–173

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter LA (1984) Continuum structures. I. J Appl Probab 21:802–815

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter LA (1986) Continuum structures II. In: Mathematical Proc of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 99:331–338

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter LA, Kim C (1986) Bounding the stochastic performance of continuum structure functions. J Appl Probab 23:660–669

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum L (1969) On the importance of different components in a multi-component system. In: Krishnaiah PR (ed) Multivariate Analysis II, Academic, New York, pp 581–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Block HW, Savits TH (1984) Continuous multi-state structure functions. Oper Res 32:703–714.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bosche A (1987) Calculation of critical importance for multi-state components. IEEE Trans Reliab, R-36:247–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunelle R, Kapur KC (1998) Continuous-state system reliability: an interpolation approach. IEEE Trans Reliab 47:181-187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler DA (1979) A complete importance ranking for component of binary coherent systems with extensions to multi-state systems. Nav Res Logist Quart 26:565-578

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty S, Ushakov I (2000) Effectiveness analysis of GlobalstarTM gateways. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Reliability (MMR’2000). Bordeaux, France, vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmakias D (2008) New computational methods in power system reliability. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussel JB (1975) How to hand-calculate system reliability and safety characteristics. IEEE Trans Reliab R-24 (3):168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnedenko B (1969) Mathematical Methods of Reliability Theory. Academic, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gnedenko B (1988) Course of probability theory. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnedenko B, Ushakov I (1995) Probabilistic reliability engineering. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith WS (1980) Multi-state reliability models. J Appl Prob 17:735–744

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmett G, Stirzaker D (1992) Probability and random processes. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Korczak E (2007) New formulae for failure/repair frequency of multi-state monotone systems and its applications. Control Cybern 36(1):219–239

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Korczak E (2008) Calculating steady state reliability indices of multi-state systems using dual number algebra. In: Martorell et al (eds) Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications. Proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference (ESREL2008). Valencia, Spain, pp1795–1802

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin G (2005) Universal generating function in reliability analysis and optimization. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin G (2008) Optimal structure of multi-state systems with uncovered failures. IEEE Trans Reliab 57 (1):140–148

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin G, Amari S (2009) Optimal load distribution in series-parallel systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin G, Dai Y, Ben-Haim H (2006) Reliability and performance of star topology grid service with precedence constraints on subtask execution. IEEE Trans Reliab 55(3):507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin G, Lisnianski A (1998) Structure optimization of power system with bridge topology. Electr Power Syst Res 45:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin G, Lisnianski A (1999) Importance and sensitivity analysis of multi-state systems using the universal generating function method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 65:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin G, Lisnianski A, Ben Haim H et al (1998) Redundancy optimization for series-parallel multi-state systems. IEEE Trans Reliab 47:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski A (2001). Estimation of boundary points for continuum-state system reliability measures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski A (2004a) Universal generating function technique and random process methods for multi-state system reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop in Applied Probability (IWAP2004). Piraeus, Greece, pp 237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski A (2004b) Combined generating function and semi-Markov process technique for multi-state system reliability evaluation. In: Communications of the 4th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Reliability. Methodology and Practice, Santa-Fe, NM, 21–25 June, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski A, Levitin G (2003) Multi-state system reliability: assessment, optimization and applications. World Scientific, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski A, Ben Haim H, Elmakis D (1994) Redundancy optimization for power station. In: Proc of the 10th International Conference of the Israel Society for Quality, Jerusalem, 14–17 November 1994, pp 313–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski A, Levitin G, Ben-Haim H et al (1996) Power system structure optimization subject to reliability constraints. Electr Power Syst Res 39:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisnianski A, Levitin G, Ben Haim H (2000) Structure optimization of multi-state system with time redundancy. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 67:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero J, Tejada J, Yanez J (1990) Structural properties of continuum systems. Eur J Oper Res 45:231–240

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nourelfath M, Dutuit Y (2004) A combined approach to solve the redundancy optimization problem for multi-state systems under repair policies. Reliab Eng Sys Saf 86:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Marquez J, Coit D (2005) Composite importance msures for multi-state systems with multi-state components. IEEE Trans Reliab 54(3):517–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinshke K, Ushakov I (1988) Application of Graph Theory for Reliability Analysis. Radio i Sviaz. Moscow (in Russian and in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (2000) Introduction to probability models. Academic, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ryabinin I (1976). Reliability of engineering systems: Principles and analysis. Mir, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi S, Muppala JK, Woolet SP, Haverkort BR (1992) Composite performance and dependability analysis. Perf Eval 14:197–215

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ushakov I (1986) A universal generating function. Sov J Comput Syst Sci 24:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushakov I (1987) Optimal standby problem and a universal generating function. Sov J Comput Syst Sci 25:61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushakov I (1998) An object oriented approach to generalized generating function. In: Proc of the ECCO-XI Conference (European Chapter on Combinatorial Optimization), Copenhagen, May 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushakov I (2000) The method of generating sequences. Eur J Oper Res 125(2):316–323

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh W (2009) A convolution universal generating function method for evaluating the symbolic one-to-all target subset reliability function the acyclic multi-state information networks. IEEE Trans Reliab 58(3):476–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zio E, Podofillini L (2003) Monte Carlo simulation analysis of the effects of different system performance levels on the importance of multi-state components. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 82:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo M, Jiang R, Yam R (1999) Approaches for reliability modeling of continuous-state devices. IEEE Trans Reliab 48(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2010). Universal Generating Function Method. In: Multi-state System Reliability Analysis and Optimization for Engineers and Industrial Managers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-320-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-320-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-319-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-320-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics