Abstract
Failure is inevitable for everything in the real world, and engineering systems are no exception. The impact of failures varies from minor inconvenience and costs to personal injury, significant economic loss, and death. Examples of major accidents are those at the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl nuclear plants, the gas leak at the Bhopal pesticide plant, and the Challenger space shuttle explosion. Causes of failure include bad engineering design, faulty manufacturing, inadequate testing, human error, poor maintenance, improper use, and lack of protection against excessive stress. Designers, manufacturers, and end users strive to minimize the occurrence and recurrence of failures. In order to minimize failures in engineering systems, it is essential to understand why and how failures occur. It is also important to know how often such failures may occur. Reliability deals with the failure concept, whereas safety deals with the consequences after the failure. Inherent safety systems/measures ensure the consequences of failures are minimal. Reliability and safety engineering attempts to study, characterize, measure, and analyze the failure, repair, and consequences of failure of systems in order to improve their operational use by increasing their design life, eliminating or reducing the likelihood of failures and risky consequences, and reducing downtime, thereby increasing available operating time at the lowest possible life cycle costs.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Elsayed EA (1996) Reliability engineering. Prentice Hall
Misra KB (1992) Reliability analysis and prediction. Elsevier
USNRC (1975) Reactor safety study – an assessment of accident risk in US commercial power plants (WASH-1400). USNRC
Zio E (2009) Reliability engineering: old problems and new challenges. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 94:125–141
IAEA (1992) Procedure for conducting probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants (level 1). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Safety Series no. 50-P-4
NASA (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners. Version 1.1, NASA report
Modarres M (1985) Statistical uncertainty analysis in reactor risk estimation. Nuclear Engineering and Design 85:385–399
Wu JS, Apostolakis GE, Okrent D (1990) Uncertainties in system analysis: probabilistic vs non probabilistic theories. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 30:163–181
Helton JC (1993) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 42:327–367
Ferson S, Hajago JG (2004) Arithmetic with uncertain numbers: rigorous and often best possible answers, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 85:135–152
Karanki DR, Kushwaha HS, Verma AK, Srividya A (2007) Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92(7):947–956
SAFERELNET (2006) Safety and reliability of industrial products, systems and structures – current position and future research needs, <http://www.mar.ist.utl.pt/saferelnet/>
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2010). Introduction. In: Reliability and Safety Engineering. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, vol 0. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-232-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-232-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-231-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-232-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)