Abstract
In earlier chapters we analyzed times to occurrence of an event of interest. Such an event could be failure of a component or system. If the failure is not repaired, and the component or system is replaced following failure, then the earlier analysis methods are applicable. However, in this chapter, we consider the case in which the failed component or system is repaired and placed back into service.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Intermediate cases, in which repair leaves the component in a state in between new and old, can also be modeled, along with imperfect repair, which leaves a component worse than old. Such more general models are less commonly used, and are still an area of research and thus practical guidelines are difficult to give, so they are not included herein.
References
Rodionov A, Kelly D, Uwe-Klügel J (2009) Guidelines for analysis of data related to ageing of nuclear power plant components and systems. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy, Luxembourg: European Commission
Ascher H, Feingold H (1984) Repairable systems reliability: modeling, inference, misconceptions and their causes. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York
Bain L, Engelhardt M (1991) Statistical theory of reliability and life-testing models. Marcel Dekker, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kelly, D., Smith, C. (2011). Modeling Failure with Repair. In: Bayesian Inference for Probabilistic Risk Assessment. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-187-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-187-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-186-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-187-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)