Abstract
So far we have only analyzed cases where the observed data were known with certainty and completeness. Reality is messier in a number of ways with respect to observed data. For example, the number of binomial demands may not have been recorded and may have to be estimated. Similarly, the exposure time in the Poisson distribution may have to be estimated. One may not always be able to tell the exact number of failures that have occurred, because of imprecision in the failure criterion. When observing times at which failures occur (i.e., random durations), various types of censoring can occur. For example, a number of components may be placed in test, but the test is terminated before all the components have failed. This produces a set of observed data consisting of the recorded failure times for those components that have failed. For the components that did not fail before the test was terminated, all we know is that the failure time was longer than the duration of the test. As another example, in recording fire suppression times, the exact time of suppression may not be known; in some cases, all that may be available is an interval estimate (e.g., between 10 and 20 min). In this chapter, we will examine how to treat all of these cases, which we refer to generally as uncertain data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rodionov A, Kelly D, Uwe-Klügel J (2009) Guidelines for analysis of data related to ageing of nuclear power plant components and systems. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy, Luxembourg, European Commission
Bain L, Engelhardt M (1991) Statistical theory of reliability and life-testing models. Marcel Dekker, New York (Basel)
Meeker WO, Escobar LA (1998) Statistical methods for reliability data. Wiley, New York
Kelly DL, Smith CL (2009) Bayesian inference in probabilistic risk assessment: the current state of the art. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:628–643
Siu NO, Kelly DL (1998) Bayesian parameter estimation in probabilistic risk assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 62:89–116
Martz H, Picard R (1995) Uncertainty in poisson event counts and exposure time in rate estimation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 48:181–193
Martz H, Hamada M (2003) Uncertainty in counts and operating times in estimating poisson occurrence rates. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 80:75–79
Tan Z, Xi W (2003) Bayesian analysis with consideration of data uncertainty in a specific scenario. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79:17–31
Groen FG, Mosleh A (2005) Foundations of probabilistic inference with uncertain evidence. Int J Approximate Reasoning 39:49–83
Walley P (1991) Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London
Dezfuli H, Kelly DL, Smith C, Vedros K, Galyean W (2009) Bayesian inference for NASA probabilistic risk and reliability analysis. NASA, Washington, DC
Siu NO (1990) A monte carlo method for multiple parameter estimation in the presence of uncertain data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 28:59–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kelly, D., Smith, C. (2011). Bayesian Treatment of Uncertain Data. In: Bayesian Inference for Probabilistic Risk Assessment. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-187-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-187-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-186-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-187-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)